Robbery + agg robbery Flashcards

1
Q

Define robbery, state section and penalty

A

S234(1): robbery is theft accompanied by violence, or threats of violence, to person or property, used to extort the property stolen or to prevent or overcome resistance to its being stolen.

Max 10 years imprisonment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Define theft

A

Dishonestly and without claim of right, taking any property with intent to deprive the owner permanently of that property or any interest in that property.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Define claim of right

A

Claim of right in relation to any offence means a belief at the time of the act in a proprietary or possessory right in property in relation to which the offence is alleged to have been committed, although that belief may be based on ignorance or mistake of fact or of any matter of law other than the enactment against which the offence is alleged to have been committed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

R v skivington

A

Larceny (or theft) is an ingredient of robbery, and if the honest belief that a man has claim of right is a defence to larceny, then it negates one of the ingredients in the offence of robbery, without proof of which the full offence is not made out.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

R v Lapier

A

Robbery is complete the instant the property is taken, even if possession by he thief is only momentary.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Discuss possession

A

Possession may be actual or constructive.

Actual possession arises where the thing in question is in a persons physical custody (Warner v Metropolitan Police Commissioner)

Constructive possession arises when something is not in a physical custody, but they have ready access to it or can exercise control over it. (Sullivan v Earl of Caithness)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Warner v Metropolitan Police Commissioner

A

The term possession must be given a sensible and reasonable meaning in its context, a possessor of a thing has:

  • complete physical control over it.
  • knowledge of its existence, it’s situation and its qualities.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Sullivan v Earl of Caithness

A

Possession includes “not merely those who have physical custody of firearms, but also those who have firearms under their control at their behest, even though it may be kept at another location.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Define property

A

Property includes real and personal property, or any estate or interest in real or personal property, money, electricity, and any debt, and any thing in action, and any othe right or interest.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the three cases involved with intent?

A

Simester and Brookbanks: principals of Criminal law

R v Mohan

R v Waaka

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Simester and Brookbanks: Principals of Criminal law

A

A person “intends to do an action (or to bring about some consequence) if he wants to do that action (or to bring about that consequence)… and he behaves as he does because of that desire

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

R v Mohan

A

Intent involves “a decision to bring about, in so far as it lies within the accused’is power, the commission of the offence”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

R v Waaka

A

A fleeting or passing thought is not sufficient, there must be a firm intent or a firm purpose to effect an act.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

R v Maihi

A

It is implicit in ‘accompany’ that there must be a nexus (connection) between the act of stealing and a threat of violence. Both must be present. However the term “does not require that the act of stealing and the threat of violence be contemporaneous”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Peneha v Police

A

Bag snatch:

It is sufficient that “the actions of the defendant forcibly interfere with personal freedom or amount to forcible powerful or violent action or motion producing a very marked or powerful effect tending to cause bodily injury or discomfort”.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

R v Broughhon

A

A threat of violence is the “manifestation of an intention to inflict violence unless the money or property be handed over. The threat may be direct or veiled. It may be conveyed by words or conduct, or a combination of both.

17
Q

Give examples of what must be considered when deciding if a threat was made was ‘bad enough’?

A
  • the relative age of the parties
  • their respective physiques
  • their appearance
  • their demeanour
  • what was said and done by those involved
  • the manner and setting in which the incident took place.
18
Q

Aggravated robbery, 235(a) ingredients, penalty

A
  1. Robs any person
  2. And at the time of, OR
    immediately after, OR
    Immediately before
  3. Causes GBH to any person

14 years

19
Q

Aggravated robbery, 235(a) ingredients, penalty

A
  1. Robs any person
  2. And at the time of, OR
    immediately after, OR
    Immediately before
  3. Causes GBH to any person
20
Q

DPP v Smith

A

“bodily harm” needs no explanation and “grevious” means no more and no less than “really serious”.

21
Q

Aggravated robbery, 235(b) ingredients, penalty

A
  1. Being together with any other person, OR
    Persons
  2. Robs
  3. Any person
22
Q

R v Joyce

A

The crown must establish that at least two persons were physically present at the time the robbery was committed or the assault occurred.

23
Q

R v Joyce

A

The crown must establish that at least two persons were physically present at the time the robbery was committed or the assault occurred.

24
Q

R v Galey

A

“Being together” in the context of section 235(b) involves “two or more persons having the common intention to use their combined force, either in any event or as circumstances might require, directly in the perpetration of the crime”.

25
Q

Aggravated robbery, section 235(c) ingredients. Penalty

A
  1. Being armed with any: offensive weapon, OR
    Instrument, OR
    Anything appearing to be such a weapon or instrument
  2. Robs
  3. Any person

14 years

26
Q

Aggravated robbery, section 235(c) ingredients. Penalty

A
  1. Being armed with any: offensive weapon, OR
    Instrument, OR
    Anything appearing to be such a weapon or instrument
  2. Robs
  3. Any person

14 years

27
Q

Define being armed with

A

Being armed with means that the defendant is carrying the item or has it available for immediate use as a weapon.

28
Q

Define offensive weapon

A

Section 202A(4)(a) offensive weapon means any article made or altered for use for causing bodily injury, or intended by the person having it with him for such use.

29
Q

Define instrument

A

Not defined by statute but will include any item intended to be used as a weapon or to intimidate and overhear the victims will to resist.

30
Q

Anything appearing to be such a weapon or instrument

A

What is possessed must be a thing, cannot be the hand or offenders fingers. Court should be able to have the item confiscated by police in theory.

31
Q

S236(1)(a), ingredients and penalty

A
  1. With intent to rob any person
  2. Causes GBH
  3. To that person, OR
    Any other person

14 years

32
Q

S236(1)(b), ingredients and penalty

A
  1. With intent to rob any person
  2. Being armed with any:
    -offensive weapon
    -instrument
    - anything appearing to be such a weapon or instrument
  3. Assaults that person, OR
    Any other person

14 years

33
Q

S236(1)(c), ingredients and penalty

A
  1. With intent to rob any person
  2. Being together with any other person or persons
  3. Assaulted that person, OR
    Any other person