Robbery Flashcards

1
Q

Robbery
Section 234 (1)
10 Years

A
Theft
Accompanied by Violence
OR threats of violence
To any person OR Property
Used to extort the property stolen OR
Used to prevent or overcome resistance to it being stolen
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Aggravated Robbery
Section 235(a)
14 Years

A
Robs
Any person
and at the time of OR immediately before OR after
Causes GBH (really serious harm)
To any person
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Aggravated Robbery
Section 235(b)
14 Years

A

Being together with any person/s

Robs any person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Aggravated Robbery
Section 235(c)
14 Years

A

Being armed with any offensive weapon OR instrument
OR
Anything appearing to be such an offensive weapon or instrument
Robs any person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q
Assault with intent to Rob
Section 236 (1)(a)
14 Years
A

With intent to Rob any person
Causes GBH
To that person or any other person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q
Assault with intent to Rob
Section 236 (1)(b)
14 Years
A

With intent to Rob any person
Being armed with any offensive weapon or instrument or anything appearing to be such a weapon or instrument
Assaults that person or any other person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q
Assault with intent to Rob
Section 236 (1)(c)
14 Years
A

With intent to Rob any person
Being together with any other person/s (two or more)
Assaults that person or any other person

R V GALEY
Being together, involves two or more persons having a common intention to use combined force in the preparation of the crime.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q
Assault with intent to Rob
Section 236 (2)
14 Years
A

Assaults
Any person
with intent to Rob
That person or any other person.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Case law..

A

R V SKIVINGTON: Larceny or theft is an ingredient of robbery and if the honest belief that a man has a claim of right is a defence to larceny. Then it negatives one of the ingredients in the offence of robbery, without proof of which the full offence is not made out

R V LAPIER:
Robbery is complete the instant the property is taken, even if possession by the thief is only momentary.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly