Robbery Flashcards
Intro
S.8 of the theft act 1968
Indictable offence
DLS
Theft
R v Robinson
NG of robbery as he had a genuine belief the money was his so not dishonest
Theft
Concuran v Anderton
Theft = complete, so G of robbery.
With force of threat
R v Dawson and James
Minimal force can satisfy robbery
It is the jury’s decision
With force or threat
R v Clawden
Confirmed R v Dawson and James
The jury must decide if force is applied.
With force or threat
R v B and R
V doesn’t have to be scared for D to be guilty.
Def = ‘seek to put any person in fear’ doesn’t ,Ayer of they are.
Before or during
R v Hale
Theft was still on going when V was tied up, it was a continuing act.
Before or during
R v Lockely
Followed decision in R v Hale.