Robbery Flashcards

1
Q

Theft elements

A

Dishonestly
Without claim of right.
Takes any property.
With the intent to deprive the owner. permanently of the property.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Robbery Section and elements

A

Section 234 (1) CA 61
Theft
Accompanied by violence OR accompanied by the threat of violence.
To any person or property.
Used to extort the property stolen OR prevent or overcome resistence to it being stolen.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Assault with intent to rob GBH section and elements.

A

Section 236(1)(a) CA 61
With intent to rob any person.
Causes GBH to that person or any other person.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Assault with intent to rob with another person section and elements.

A

Section 236 (1)(c) CA 61
With intent to rob any person.
Being together with any other person or persons.
Assaults that person or any other persons.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Assault with intent to rob offensive weapon or instrument section and elements.

A

Section 236(1)(b) CA 61
With intent to rob any person.
Being armed with any offensive weapon or instrument/any thing appearing to be such a weapon or instrument.
Assaults that person or any other persons.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Assault with intent to rob standard assault section and elements.

A

Section 236(2) CA 61
Assaults any person.
With intent to rob that person or any other persons.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Case law defining violence

A

Peneha v Police - Violence removes the victims freedom and/or causes bodily harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Threats of violence case law

A

R v Broughton - Threats of violence, threats may be direct or veiled.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

GBH case law

A

DPP - Smith - GBH means really serious harm.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Case law for two or more people

A

R v Joyce - The two people must be physically present at the time of the robbery.

R v Galey - Being together means two people have a common intention.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Case law for possession of a weapon

A

R v Bentham - What is possessed must be a thing and not a hand and fingers.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

R v Peat

A

Instantly returning the property does not relieve the defendant of guilt.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Aggravated robbery GBH section and elements

A

Section 235 (a) CA61
Robs any person
At the time of OR immediately before OR immediately after, the robbery.
Causes GBH.
To any person.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Aggravated robbery being together with another section and elements

A

Section 235 (b) CA61
Being together with any other person or persons.
Robs.
Any person.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Aggravated robbery possession of an offensive weapon section and elements.

A

Section 235 (c) CA61
While armed with any offensive weapon or instrument OR anything appearing to be such a weapon or instrument.
Robs.
Any other person.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Case law for when robbery is complete

A

R v Lapier - Robbery is complete the instant the property is taken.

16
Q

R v Maihi

A

There must be a nexus between the theft and threat

17
Q

R v broughton

A

Threats may be direct or veiled. intention to inflict violence unless property is handed over.

18
Q

R v Joyce

A

Two or more people must be physically present at the time.

19
Q

R v Galey

A

Being together is having a common intention.