Robbery Flashcards
Section 234(1)
Robbery
- theft
- accompanied by violence OR accompanied by threats of violence
- to any person
- used to extort the property stolen OR to prevent or overcome resistance to its being stolen
Theft elements
- dishonestly
- without claim of right
- takes any property
- with intent to deprive the owner permanently of that property
Section 235(a)
Aggravated robbery
- robs any person
- at the time of OR immediately before OR immediately after the robbery
- causes GBH
- to any person
Section 235(b)
Aggravated robbery
- being together with any other person or persons
- robs
- any person
Section 235(c)
Aggravated robbery
- being armed with any offensive weapon or instrument OR anything appearing to be such a weapon or instrument
- robs
- any other person
Section 236(1)(a)
Assault with intent to rob
- with intent to rob any person
- caused GBH to that person or any other person
Section 236(1)(b)
Assault with intent to rob
- with intent to rob any person
- being armed with any offensive weapon or instrument OR any thing appearing to be such a weapon or instrument
- assaults that person or any other person
Section 236(1)(c)
Assault with intent to rob
- with intent to rob any person
- being together with any other person or persons
- assaults that person or any other person
Section 236(2)
Assault with intent to rob
- assaults any person
- with intent to rob that person or any other person
R v Skivington
Theft is an element of robbery. If the honest belief that a man has a claim of right is a defence then it negates the elements of the offence. Without proof of which the full offence is not made out
R v Lapier
Robbery is complete the instant the property is taken, even if possession by the thief is only momentary.
R v Cox
Physical element - actual or potential physical custody or control
Mental element - combination of knowledge and intention. Knowledge in the sense of an awareness by the accused that the substance is in his possession and an intention to exercise possession
R v Maihi
There must be a nexus between the act of stealing and a threat of violence. Both must be present
Peneha v Police
It is sufficient that the actions of the defendant forcibly interfere with personal freedom or violent action or motion producing a very marked or powerful effect tending to cause bodily injury or discomfort
R v Broughton
A threat of violence is the manifestation to an intention to inflict violence unless the money or properly be handed over