Road Policing Flashcards

1
Q

The key focus of urgent duty driving

A

No duty is so urgent that it requires the public or Police to be placed at an unjustified risk

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

List the overriding principles of urgent duty driving

PRETTY TRIP

A

PRETTY TRIP = Prioritised/safEsT/appropriaTe/legallY/TenR/vehIcles/Passengers

  • public and police employee safety must be Prioritised
  • urgent duty driving must be conducted in the safEsT possible manner
  • enforcement officers must drive at a speed and in a manner appropriaTe to the circumstances
  • enforcement officers are individually legallY responsible for their actions
  • enforcement officers will use TenR and;
  • cat A vehIcles are preferred for urgent duty driving as they are more visible
  • enforcement officers must assess the risk of carrying non-constabulary Passengers before undertaking urgent duty driving.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Define urgent duty driving

(CITED ARSON)

A

CITED ARSON = CritIcal/gaThering
/apprEhenDing
/motorcAe/commissioneR
/defenceS/executiON

When an enforcement officer on duty is driving above the speed limit or the natural flow of traffic, and may not be complying with certain traffic rules, and is:

  • responding to a CrItical incident
  • gaThering evidence of an alleged offence
  • apprEhenDing an offender for a traffic or criminal offence
  • apprehending a fleeing driver
  • participating in a motorcAde
  • engaged in activities approved by the CommissioneR in writing

AND:

  • Relying on the defenceS under LT (RU 2004) and the LTA (1998) for not complying with rules that would prevent the executiON of that duty
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What factors should you consider when undertaking urgent duty driving?

A
  • time of the incident (is it in progress?)
  • nature and seriousness of the incident
  • proximity of the incident
  • proximity of other units to the incident
  • environment
  • driver classification, vehicle classification, and vehicle passengers
  • whether warning devices are activated or a tactical approach is being used
  • vehicle type
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Re equipment - the number one MUST

A

Police MUST use red and blue flashing lights AND siren at all times (continuously) while undertaking urgent duty driving UNLESS a tactical approach is used

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the ONE exception to the #1 MUST re equipment and urgent duty driving?

A

If using a ‘tactical approach’ when urgent duty driving then don’t have to use lights and sirens

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

List what a tactical approach can involve

A
  • adjusting the vehicle speed
  • turning off or not activating the siren
  • turning off or not activating the warning lights
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Provide examples of when a tactical approach may be used

A
  • approaching the scene of a serious crime in progress
  • attending a report of a suicidal person
  • obtaining evidence of a speeding offence, where the offender’s driving is not dangerous and the risk of not using the warning devices is judged as low
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

List the principles of the fleeing driver policy

ATTEND SHOOTER

A
ATTEND SHOOTER = sAfeTy/sufficienT/
invEstigatioN/justifieD/
riSk/Harm/abandOnment/
suppOrted/TimEly/
contRavenes
  • sAfeTy takes precedence over the apprehension of a fleeing driver
  • a driver failing to stop or remain stopped is not sufficienT reason to commence a pursuit
  • invEstigatioN is preferred
  • only justifieD when the threat posed by the vehicle’s occupants BEFORE signaling the driver to stop AND the necessity to immediately apprehend the driver and/or passengers OUTWEIGHS THE RISK OF HARM created by the pursuit
  • consider the likely impact of any response on the riSk of Harm, particularly where CYP are involved
  • all staff share a collective responsibility to achieve safety
  • abandOnment/not pursuing will be suppOrted
  • fleeing driver events will be investigated
  • events will be reviewed in a TimEly manner
  • staff may be criminally liable if their manner of driving contRavenes legislation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What must you consider when you have made a decision to stop a driver?

A

As part of TENR, you must consider:

  • the initial threat posed by the vehicle occupants
  • the necessity to immediately apprehend the driver and/or passengers AND
  • the risk of harm to any person created by commencing a pursuit
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What must an officer decide before signaling a driver to stop?

A

Whether to commence a pursuit if the driver fails to stop or remain stopped

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Coming under TENR, what considerations should be covered off when deciding to stop a vehicle?

A
  • what is the threat posed by the driver/vehicle occupants?
  • who may be harmed if the driver flees?
  • is Police action increasing or decreasing the risk of harm?
  • are the risks created by a pursuit greater than the initial risk posed by the driver and/or vehicle occupants?
  • what alternative options are there for resolving the event safely?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

List the considerations for stopping vehicles when utilising TENR

A
  • the reason for stopping: eg, vehicle and license check, breath testing, traffic or criminal offence
  • likelihood of the driver failing to stop when signalled eg, the driver of a stolen vehicle
  • the safety of other road users, vehicle occupants and police
  • identity of the driver and/or passengers
  • likely age of the driver, the impact of age on their decision making ability and driving experience
  • number and likely age of passengers and their likely influence on the driver
  • environmental circumstances eg, road conditions, traffic density, foot traffic, school hours/proximity, weather, driver behaviour, condition of vehicle
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Would commencing a pursuit because the driver didn’t stop or failed to remain stopped be justified?

A

No.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Land transport act - section 113 - Enforcement officers may enforce traffic legislation - DIM - HOD = OLD

A

(a) DIRECT a person on a road (whether or not in charge of a vehicle) to give:
- full name
- full address
- DOB
- occupation
- telephone number; or such of those particulars as the officer may specify, and give any other particulars required as to the person’s identity and (unless the person is, for the time being, detained or under arrest under any enactment) give such information as is within the person’s knowledge and as may lead to the identification of the driver or person in charge of a vehicle

(b) INSPECT, test, and examine - (i) the brakes or any part of a vehicle on a road or any associated equipment; or (ii) a land transport document, or a document resembling a land transport document, displayed or carried on the vehicle.

(c) If the enforcement officer RGTB that a vehicle on a road causes an obstruction on the road or to a vehicle entrance to any property or that the removal of the vehicle is desirable in the interests of road safety or for the convenience or in the interests of the public - (i) enter, or authorize another person to enter the vehicle for the purpose of MOVING it or preparing it for movement; and -
(ii) Move, or authorize another person to move, the vehicle to a place where it does not constitute a traffic HAZARD

(d) Direct the driver or person in charge of a vehicle on a road to remove the vehicle from the road or a specified part of a road, if the officer RGTB that it causes an OBSTRUCTION on the road or to a vehicle entrance to any property or its removal is desirable in the interests of road safety or for the convenience or in the interests of the public
(e) forbid an unlicensed DRIVER to drive a motor vehicle
(f) forbid a person who is OPERATING a transport service without a license to operate that transport service

(3) An enforcement officer in uniform may -
(a) direct a person using a vehicle or riding or driving an animal on the road to stop the vehicle or animal, as the case may be, or to cause it to proceed in or keep to a particular LINE of traffic or direction.
(b) direct a pedestrian not to proceed across the road in contravention of a DIRECTION to stop given by the enforcement officer (whether given to pedestrians or to pedestrians and other traffic).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Section 114: Power to require driver to stop and give name, address etc

(UNICORN WEINER)

A

UNICORN WEINER = UNIform/vehiCle/stOp/
paRticulars/demaNd/
oWnEr/IdentificatioN/
idEntity/aRrest

  1. In UNiform may signal driver to stop
  2. In a vehICle may require the driver to stOp
    2A. Driver must remain stopped
  3. May require the driver of a vehicle that is stopped under 114 to:
    (a. ) remain stopped for as long as is necessary to obtain paRticulars or complete the exercise of any power in LTA; and -

(b. ) on demaNd by an enforcement officer -
(i. ) give his or her full name, full address, date of birth, occupation, and telephone number, or such of those particulars as the enforcement officer may specify; and -
(ii) state whether or not he or she is the oWnEr of the vehicle; and -
(iii) if the driver is not the owner of the vehicle, give the name and address of the owner or such particulars within the driver’s knowledge as.may lead to the IdentificatioN of the owner

(4) the driver does not have to remain stopped if the police vehicle does not itself stop in the near vicinity where the driver has stopped
(5) may require the driver to remain stopped as long as is reasonably necessary to establish idEntity but not for longer than 15 minutes

(6) may aRrest if GCTS:
(a) has failed to comply with 114; or -
(b) gives false details

17
Q

Section 119 - Powers of entry (driveway time)

A
  1. An enforcement officer may exercise the powers conferred by ss2 if the enforcement officer -
    a. has GCTS a person:
    (i) has contravened a request or requirement under 114 (OTHER THAN SS1); and -
    (ii) has committed, or is committing an offence against S35(1)(a) or S35(1)(b) (relates to reckless or dangerous driving), or is, or has recently been, driving under the influence of drink, or a drug, or both; and -
    (b) is freshly pursuing that person
  2. You may, in the course of the pursuit, enter by force if necessary any premises which the person has entered for either or both of the following purposes:
    (a) determining whether or not a power conferred on an enforcement officer by S68 or 69 (in relation to EBA) should be exercised in respect of that person
    (b) exercising or completing the exercise of any such power in respect of that person (as if the person were in a motor vehicle on a road)

2A. Obligations - must RAIN

  1. Can only arrest if contravenes: 68(3) - fails to remain or 69(6) - fails to accompany
18
Q

Section 120 - arrest of persons for alcohol or drug related offences, or assault on an enforcement officer

A

If GCTS:
(1)(a) S58-62
(b) assaults police - can K9
(1A) can K9 if fails to complete CIT

19
Q

S121 / 121A - May immobilize vehicle in specified circumstances - FARM

A

(1)(a)(i)(A-C) if person is 1k

2(a) FORBID the driver

(b) direct the driver to A specified place
(c) REMOVE the keys
(d) iMmobilize the vehicle

(3) If EBA then must be 12 hours
(4) May arrest if they contravene

121A - May give directions or immobilize vehicle if driver breaches certain license conditions

20
Q

Case law: Tapara v Police 1988

A

Tapara charged with failing to stop and trespass

Situation: Police saw a passenger in his vehicle - wanted to speak to this person - Tapara didn’t stop and went right into the local bottle store that he had been previously trespassed from

Issue: Did Police have the power to require Tapara to stop if it’s not about the driving of his vehicle?

Answer = No. Traffic stops are restricted to the enforcement or administration of the Land Transport Act

21
Q

What is the gist of Tapara v Police 1988?

A

That traffic stops are restricted to the enforcement or administration of the Land Transport Act.

22
Q

R v T 2001

A

Situation: T seen driving vehicle oddly - changing lanes w/out indication - stopped at a green light - officer checked NIA and saw T had drug convictions - stopped the car under the LTA - smelt cannabis - invoked SSA - discovered drug dealing - court of appeal dismissed the charges - found the smelling of the cannabis was linked to the illegal stopping

  • there was no legal basis for the constable to believe he had the power to stop the vehicle

Comment: under S121 SSA you can stop a vehicle if certain prerequisites are met or S9 - UAL / committed an offence punishable by imprisonment

Gist: - every vehicle stop must be able to be legally justified - staff must be clear in their minds what power they are using before stopping a vehicle

23
Q

What is the gist of R v T 2001?

A

Every vehicle stop must be able to be legally justified - staff must be clear in their minds what power they are using before stopping a vehicle.

24
Q

Johnson v Police - 1995

A

Two officers stopped Johnson - not in uniform or a marked patrol car - Police noticed a toolbox in the back - suspected it was stolen - arrested and convicted - Appeal to the High Court - charges dismissed

  • The failure to observe the elementary requirements of 114 meant the stop was unlawful and was an arbitrary detention in breach of S22 NZBORA
  • This serves as a reminder that there is no general power to stop vehicles outside of the clear statutory powers.
25
Q

What is the gist of Johnson v Police 1995?

Hint: involves arbitrary vehicle stop

A

This serves as a reminder that there is no general power to stop vehicles outside of the clear statutory powers.

26
Q

Police v Duff 2010 - McGuire J trying to make our job difficult

A

Circumstances:
2007 - Duff stopped for speeding under 114 - asked for his address and driver license - officer went to do a QP - Duff then took off - the District Court found 114 was exceeded - appealed and the powers to enforce traffic legislation come from S113 and these powers are expressed in non-exhaustive terms

  • The Crown argued that Po v MOT (1987) gives enforcement officers a more ‘malleable’ power to make inquiries of the driver, provided that the driver is not stopped for an unreasonable period of time.
  • The Crown argued that, “… serious consequences would result if law enforcement officers were unable to direct a motorist to remain stopped while inquiries were made as to whether the driver was disqualified/suspended or forbidden to drive.”
  • Duff provides that an enforcement officer may undertake inquiries in accordance with S114(2A) (driver must remain stopped), and that ss5(may require driver to remain stopped as long as is reasonably necessary to establish identity but not for longer than 15 mins) is subject to (2A) and (3)(may require driver to remain stopped for as long as is necessary to obtain particulars etc)
  • Furthermore Duff suggests that an enforcement officer who, as a result of inquiries, learns that a motorist is subject to any outstanding warrants may take appropriate action
27
Q

What is the gist of Duff?

A

Duff provides that an enforcement officer may undertake inquiries in accordance with S114(2A) (driver must remain stopped), and that ss5(may require driver to remain stopped as long as is reasonably necessary to establish identity but not for longer than 15 mins) is subject to (2A) and (3)(may require driver to remain stopped for as long as is necessary to obtain particulars etc)

  • Furthermore Duff suggests that an enforcement officer who, as a result of inquiries, learns that a motorist is subject to any outstanding warrants may take appropriate action
28
Q

Page v Police 2001 - failure to identify

A

Didn’t comply with all of S119 - RAIN - “an inescapable duty to identify oneself”

It is a mandatory duty because the powers cut across cherished common law rights of property and privacy

29
Q

What is the gist of Page v Police 2001?

Hint: RAIN

A

A mandatory duty to RAIN because the powers conferred cut across cherished common law rights of property and privacy

30
Q

S35 Policing Act 2008 - Temporary closure of roads

A

RGTB:

  • Public disorder is imminent
  • Danger to the public exists
  • An 10+ year offence has been committed or discovered; then -

Can temporarily close a road.

31
Q

What are the two reasons that you may K9 a driver under S114?

A

Where you have GCTS they have failed to comply with S114 or have given false details