Risk structures, policies, procedures, and compliance Flashcards
What does the board need to ensure and consider when deciding what structures to put in place to fulfil its responsibilities for risk and internal control? (4)
- board will need to ensure that appropriate structures are put in place at the proper levels within the organisation to manage risk
The board needs to consider:
2. Whether risk and internal controls should be considered by the whole board or be delegated to a committee of the board.
- If delegating to a committee, whether risk and internal controls should fall under one committee, the AC, or into two separate committees, AC for internal controls and the RC (risk committee) for risk.
- The division of responsibility between itself and management for risk management.
What does the board need to consider when deciding whether to establish an audit committee? (2)
In the area of risk management and internal controls, what does provision 25 UK CG Code say the responsibilities of the AC includes? (3)
What should be the composition of the AC according to provision 24 UK CG Code? (2)
- Whether there is a requirement for the company to have an AC = yes if listed or a financial institution
- The level of discussion and monitoring required on risk management and internal controls = If greater than what board can manage = have an AC
Provision 25 = AC responsibilities include:
1. reviewing the company’s financial controls;
2. reviewing the internal control system and risk management system, unless given to a separate RC; and
3. monitoring and reviewing the effectiveness of the company’s internal audit function / considering annually whether there should be one.
Provision 24 = the AC should comprise:
1. at least 3 independent directors or 2 for smaller companies, two; and
2. at least 1 member who has recent and relevant financial experience.
Which organisations usually have a separate risk committee and why?
What are 4 benefits of having a separate risk committee?
• Banks and other large financial institutions normally have separate risk committees due to the complexity of their risk exposure
• The benefits are:
1. It can focus solely on reviewing the organisation’s risk management
- It can give the board advice on risk appetite, the organisation’s risk tolerance, and strategies to manage risk
- It can provide input into strategy formulation by helping the board to understand the key risks
- The composition of the committee is not restricted by the requirements of UK CG Code
What are 4 risks of setting up a separate risk committee?
- Conflict between the audit and risk committees
- Danger of overlooking some risks = Each committee may think the other is considering a particular risk when in fact neither are
- Message sent to senior management that risk is no longer their responsibility
- Having sufficient directors with the required skills to constitute a separate risk committee
What does the ICSA ‘Terms of reference for a risk committee’ suggest in relation to the composition of a separate risk committee? (3)
What may the role of a risk committee include? (3)
• ICSA ‘Terms of reference for a risk committee’ suggests:
1. RC should consist of at least 3 members all INEDs
- Members should have appropriate knowledge, skills, and expertise to fully understand risk appetite
- The finance director/CFO and the chief risk officer should attend committee meetings regularly.
• The role of a risk committee may include:
1. Providing assurance to the board that processes for risk management are effective
- Considering risk opportunities and making recommendations to the board
- Reviewing and approving statements to be included in the annual report concerning risk management
What is internal audit?
What does FRC Guidance on Audit Committees say on the need for one?
= an independent objective assurance and consulting activity designed to add value and improve an organisation’s operations
need for an internal audit function depends on factors such as company size, complexity of activities, and cost-benefit considerations
What are the 3 types of internal audit?
- An in-house internal audit function = company maintains full responsibility for recruiting, developing, and managing an internal audit team.
- A co-sourced internal audit function = company hires a small team of internal auditors and uses an outside professional firm to provide strategic direction to them.
- Outsource the internal audit function = company uses an external professional firm to provide all internal audit activities.
What are 4 benefits of an in-house internal audit function?
What is the benefit of co-sourcing or out-sourcing the internal audit function?
- Understands the organisation, its culture, operations and risk profile = should be able to add value to internal control and risk management processes
- can build networks and become integrated into the company’s business = become the ‘eyes and ears’ of the board regarding those activities
- provide assurance to stakeholders on the integrity of internal control and risk management systems
- could be a lower-cost option, depending on the make-up of the team
- The organisation can leverage external resources, technology, skills and experience which may not be available to it with an in-house team
What does provision 25 UK CG Code say the AC should do in relation to the internal audit function? (3)
- Provision 25 = requires the AC to monitor and review the effectiveness of the internal audit function (if one exists)
- If no internal audit function = the audit committee should consider annually whether there is a need for one and make a recommendation to the board
- Reasons why there is no internal audit function should be explained in the annual report
Why might the independence and objectivity of internal auditors be compromised?
What does the FRC Guidance on Audit Committees suggest to protect their independence?
How often should the board or AC review the internal audit function?
• Independence and objectivity may be compromised because they are also employees within the organisation = if internal auditors report to the CEO, they will be reluctant to criticise the CEO
• FRC Guidance on Audit Committees: to protect the independence of the internal audit function, the AC should be responsible for appointment or removal of the head of internal audit.
Annually
Who are the 4 main governance players in supporting the board with their risk management responsibilities?
- Cosec / governance professional
- CEO
- CRO = Chief Risk Officer
- Internal auditors
What 3 items should the cosec ensure are on the board’s (or the relevant committee’s) agenda in supporting the board with their risk management responsibilities?
- The approval of the organisation’s internal control policies and framework e.g. the approval of the organisation’s risk appetite.
- Reports from management on the implementation and effectiveness of the policies and framework.
- Evaluation of the risk management system which should occur at least annually
What 3 things should the Cosec ensure the board committee responsible for risk has in supporting the board with their risk management responsibilities?
What is an example of an agenda item for audit?
What is an example item for risk?
- terms of reference and ensure committee follows them by developing an annual plan setting out the work of the committee
- report written to the chair of the committee(s) recommendations for board approval
- Agendas for each meeting reflecting the annual plan
agenda item for audit = evaluation of performance of external auditors
agenda item for risk = recommendations and review on the risk appetite and risk tolerance of the organisation
How does the cosec have an important role in strengthening the control environment? (2)
By:
1. linking the various people, structures and processes within the control environment into a strong culture of control and risk management; and
- ensuring that the various structures and processes within the control environment are integrated effectively
What is the CEO’s role in supporting the board with their risk management responsibilities?
What 3 things should the CEO ensure in doing this?
• Accountable to the board, responsibility to ensure proper execution of the risk management strategies and policies laid down by the board
• CEO should ensure that:
1. the risk and internal control frameworks extend into the organisation
- resources, both financial and human, are made available to ensure they work efficiently.
- a culture reflecting the risk appetite of the organisation is developed = achieved through awareness sessions
What do the CRO’s responsibilities include in supporting the board with their risk management responsibilities? (4)
Who should appoint / remove the CRO?
Who should set the remuneration for the CRO?
- creating an integrated risk framework for the entire organisation
- appointing and working with risk champions to ensure risks are identified and mitigated
- communicating to key stakeholders the risk profile of the organisation
- organising training in risk management for the organisation
Walker Report = appointment / dismissal is a matter for the board
Remuneration committee should determine