Risk Assesment Flashcards
lec 1-4ish???
define toxicity?
inherent ability of a chemical to cause injury to a living system.
define food toxicology?
science that establishes basis of judgment regarding the safety of chemicals on a food system.
define a hazard
the potential something has to cause you harm
define risk
the probability or severity of the effect occuring the the person
what is absolute risk?
the probability of developing an adves effect due to exposure. eg working in a factory, 100 exposed, 5 get sick. 5% risk.
what is relative risk?
the ratio of risk between exposed and non exposed. eg, as a person not working in the factory, how likely am i to be exposed? or as a person working in the factory, how much more likely am i to get fucked up.
define risk assesment?
in simple terms: a process involving identification of hazards and uncertainties and likelihood of adverse outcomes occurring to the person.
what are the 4 steps of risk assesment? List, elaborate later.
- Hazard identification: what is the danger
- Hazard characterisation/dose responce assesment: at what dose does the effect happen.
- exposure assesment: who is exposed?
- risk characterisation: put it all together, whats the probability.
what is the objective of risk assesment?
- balance risk and benefits
- set safty limits and targerts
- estimate residual risks.
Step 1: Elaborate on Hazard identification under these headings:
what is it?
What is the aim?
how is it carried out?
What is the golden standard?
- hazard ID is the identification of the source of possible risk source. it is a qualitative description of of the nature of these effects/events.
- to identify the innate adverse toxic effect of the agent and what is the primary hazard of concern.
- in vitro or invivo
- the GS is epidemiological studies, kind of. cant exactly probe cause and effect,
Why is human epidemiological data not exactly the golden standard?
- hard to obtain
- studies may not be available
- gathering first hand data may take a while
- they can often be incomplete and unreliable (cant do cause and effect)
- usually qualitative data only. hard to get exact hard numbers, which is what you need.
who is strong, capable and smart?
you are :3
why are in vivo animal studies most commonly used in toxicology?
well controlled and known exposure, easy to see effects.
Note: only applies if the animal has similar physiology to humans, bring in the pigs, get rid of the alligators.
Step 2: what is hazard characterisation?
quantitative evaluation of the nature of the health effect of substance in question. must include doese responce assesemnt. ie. if i give an adult 30yo man 1g, 2g, 3g, 4g of coke, how much can he take, when will he die, how much does he need for it to have an effect
explain the dose responce relationship(s)
the bigger the dose, the bigger the effect. there is a cap, eventually you get the lethal dose/max effect.