right to religion Flashcards
sahin v. turkey (2005)
Sahin v. Turkey (2005)
secular laws strictly observed - women not allowed to wear head scarves in unis
went to ECtHR - ruled in favour of state - due to importance of secular tradition in europe - separation of church and state
Secularism in Europe
gained momemntum after french revolution - reactive secularism which demonized practice of religion in public spaces - public spaces to be protected against religion
American Secularism
not reactive
does not demonize religious practices in public spaces
but states religion and state are separate
Consistency of ECtHR in secular views of law
Lautsi v. Italy
italian mother - crucifixes in italian classrooms - sues the italian govt
court rules in favour of Italy
Where is the line between religion and culture? how do you define this boundary?
how to define religion?
HRC - religion consists of ideas that are cordiant (persuasive), serious, and cohesive
freedom of religion - atheist, theistic
Reynolds vs. US (1878)
mormon- allows 2 wives - reynolds argues criminalization flies against my freedom of religion bec mormon obligates the man to have more than 1 wife
ruling: SC for the first time ever, enunicated belief practice dichotomy - entitled to believe whatever you want but practice can be limited by law
Realm of thought vs. realm of practice
everybody is entitled to believe whatever they want; however, the practice MUST be limited by law
Wisconsin v. Yodo (1972)
US laws obliges parents to send children to school until 16
amish fam took case to court - saying against religious freedom - not a fan of schooling system - religion prohibits education of children in schools
SC ruled in favour of Amish peeps (religious freedom preached in 1970s)
Masterpiece Baking Company v. Civil Rights Commission of Colorado (2018)
owner of cake company refused to bake cake for same-sex couple
SC ruled in favour of baking company
Freedom of Religion in US
endorses christianity over other religions
establishment clause (1st Amendment)
- state not in a position to favour one religion over others
-indvs entitled to practice their religion as long as it does not affect the clause
2 traditions of secularism
- Anglo-American Tradition
Origin: Protestant Reformation, British dynastic politics
Aim: Disestablishment to enable religious pluralism.
U.S. 1st Amendment: Protects religious free exercise and bars state establishment.
View: Religion is to be protected as a foundation of freedom and human rights. - Continental Tradition
Origin: Enlightenment and revolutions (e.g., French Revolution, communism).
Attitude: Religion seen as repressive and tied to autocracy.
Emphasis on laicism (secularism defined against religion).
View: Religion must be restrained to enable rational freedom and equality.
Competing Approaches to Religion and Rights
Anglo-American secularism → Maximizes religious freedom.
Continental laicism → Views religion as a threat to rational progress and freedom.
Leads to distinction between “secular” (neutral) and “secularist” (oppositional) states (T.N. Madan).
Case Study: India
Gandhian secularism: Religion is integral to politics.
Nehruvian secularism: Modernization through state-building.
Challenges to Religious Freedom
Anglo-American secularism → Risk of majoritarianism (e.g., Christian nationalism in the U.S.).
Continental laicism → Risk of repressing religious expression (e.g., French headscarf laws).
Religious nationalism → Relativizes human rights (e.g., anti-conversion laws in India).
Religious Freedom Article
Article 18 - UDHR and ICCPR
General Comment No. 22 (1993)
by the UNHRC
protects beliefs, not only religions- including right not to believe
UN contributions
- Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion or Belief: Tracks violations and recommends remedies.
- Relevant legal bodies: Human Rights Council, General Assembly, UNESCO, ILO.
Regional Legal Instruments
ACHPR - article 8
ACHR - arucle 12
ECHR - article 9
Internal vs. External Dimensions
Internal: unconditional and absolute; cannot be restricted
- freedom to adopt/change belief
-freedom from coercion
External: subject to limitations only when by law and necessary to protect safety, health, and rights of others
-eg: worship and places of worship, rituals, dietary laws, holy days, etc.
Canadian Law
Section 2 (a): freedom of conscience and religion