Ricardian / HOS Model Flashcards

1
Q

Assumption made on value of imports and exports?

A

Value of exports = Value of imports

Aim to abstract from monetary influences on international trade flows.

This is known as the balanced trade assumption.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

RM Model assumptions :

A

Two countries and two goods

Single factor of production - Labour

Constant productivity - Each country has a fixed level of productivity / labour hrs per unit.

Perfect competition - Prices reflect labour input

Full employment - All resources are fully employed in both countries

There must be CA! (Eg. Portugal wine, England cloth)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Who / when made the RM Model?

What was its aim?

During which period of economics?

Whose economic theory did it challenge?

Whose work did it build on?

A

Developed by David Ricardo, a British Economist.

Aim : Benefits of trade between countries based on comparative advantage.

Book : Principles of Political Economy and Taxation (1817)

During the Industrial Revolution, when countries were specialising in specific goods.

It challenged Mercantilism, which emphasised accumulating wealth through trade surpluses.

Built on the work of Adam Smith’s theory of absolute advantage. Which emphasised that countries should specialise in which their are most efficient/ have absolute advantage.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

HOS model assumptions

A

Two countries, two goods, two factors of production.

Difference in factor endowments across countries - Labour / Capital abundant. (Drives CA!)

Identical production technology (Different to RM)

Perfect competition.

Full employment.

Labour and Capital can move within a country between industries, but not internationally.

Constant returns to scale.

No transportation costs or trade barriers such as tariffs.

Tastes / Preferences are identical across countries.

Factors of production (L and K) can substitute for each other to some extent

If K abundant - Lower returns to Capital

If L abundant - Lower wages

Technology has CRTS

No Factor Intensity Reversals. Ranking of Kx/Lx and Ky/Ly same for all w and r

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What does HOS stand for?

When / where was is developed?

Extended on whose model?

Main idea of HOS model from Heckscher?

Improvement to model from Ohlin?

Improvement to model from Samuelson?

A

Heckscher Ohlin Samuelson model in 20th century.

Developed by Swedish economists Eli Heckscher and Bertil Ohlin, later contributed to by Paul Samuelson.

Evolved over decades from trade theories such as Ricardo’s

Main idea was export goods that use abundant resources intensively and import goods which require scarce resources.

Ohlin’s improvement - CA arises from factor endowment differences. (Not just labour productivity in RM model)

Samuelson improvement - Refined Mathematical structure. Helped integrate HOS model into modern neoclassical economics.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Limitations to HOS model in assumptions + paradoxes in real world?

A

Assumes countries have same technology.

Assumes no trade barriers

Leontief Paradox (1953) :
- US regarded as capital intensive country
- Contradicted Imports / Exports data
- Caused by US technological advantage, making it seem as if goods were more K intensive.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

RM limitations

A

Assumes one factor of production, ignores capital, land and other resources.

Ignores whether goods are labour or capital intensive.

Constant returns to scale in production. Ignoring increasing returns to scale.

Labour is fully mobile within a country. Workers may not have skills required. Geographic and institutional barriers limit value mobility.

Perfect competition in product and labour market. In real - Monopoly, Oligopoly, pricing strategies such as dumping.

Technology same across countries. Some countries can adopt or develop technologies to enhance productivity.

Does not account for trade costs and trade tariffs.

Homogenous goods. In reality goods vary based on quality, brands and features.

Income = Outcome. International trade can create winners and losers, leading to income inequality.

No environmental considerations. Environment could degrade as a result of specialisation in trade.

No scope for modern trade patterns.
- Intra industry trade, trade of cars Germany and Japan
- Global chains, production across countries (Airbus)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

AA meaning and definition

Mathematical definition

Graphical definition

A

Absolute Advantage

Output per worker (productivity) in X is greater in country A

Xa>Xb

PPF intercept in X is higher if La = Lb

Relevant to RM only, HOS assume countries have same technology/ production across countries.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

CA meaning and definition

Mathematical definition

Graphical definition

A

Opportunity cost of a unit of X is lower in country A

ya/xa < yb/xb

PPFa is flatter that PPFb

CA relavant in RM and HOS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Equation for if Country A is capital abundant?

Equation for if industry Y is capital abundant?

A

Ka/La > Kb/Lb

Ky/Ly > Kx/Lx

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly