RFBT 1 Flashcards
First statement: A void obligation may be the valid subject of a novation
Second statement: If the new obligation is void, the original one, as a rule, is
still extinguished
a. Both statements are correct
b. Both statements are incorrect
c. Only the first statement is correct
d. Only the second statement is correct
B. Both statements are incorrect
This circumstance may affect the validity of the obligation if employed to induce
the consent of the other party:
a. Negligence
b. Fortuitous Event
c. Fraud
d. Delay
c. Fraud
D is indebted to C for P100,000 covered by a promissory note. Eventually, D met X,
a close friend of C, to whom he gave the P100,000 as payment for his (D) obligation
to C. C eventually negotiated the promissory note to X. In this case,
a. There is no valid payment since X is not a party in whose favor the obligation
was constituted
b. There is no valid payment since it does not appear that the payment redounded to
the benefit of C
c. There is valid payment since X was authorized to receive the same in behalf of
C
d. There is valid payment since X eventually acquired the rights to the credit
d. There is valid payment since X eventually acquired the rights to the credit
P20 bills are legal tender upto:
a. P100
b. P1,000
c. P100,000
d. No limit
d. No limit
On July 15, S sold his car to B through a public instrument, where it was agreed
that S will deliver the car on July 31 and B will pay the price on August 15. S
complied with this obligation but as of August 31, B has not yet paid the price
which prompted S to make a demand therefor. In this case, B was in delay since
a. July 15
b. July 31
c. August 15
d. August 31
d. August 31
In this kind of Substitution, the original debtor, will no longer be liable in case
of the insolvency of the new debtor subsequent to the substitution:
a. Delegacion
b. Expromision
c. Both Delegacion and Expromision
d. Neither Delegacion nor Expromision
c. Both Delegacion and Expromision
Hamzi, a Korean national, went to the Philippines for a vacation. While in Boracay,
she met went on a drinking spree and eventually met Jay, a bartender. While under
a state of drunkenness, Hamzi orally agreed to buy the land of Jay in Boracay for
P1,000,000, when its fair market value was P5,000,000. What is the status of the
contract?
a. Rescissible
b. Voidable
c. Unenforceable
d. Void
d. Void
A contract is defined as a meeting of the minds between two persons whereby one
binds himself with respect to another to give something or to render some service.
Which of the following is incorrect?
a. Contracts will always require two persons to be perfected
b. Contracts generally contain a unilateral obligation
c. Contracts cannot cover obligations not to do
d. All of the choices are incorrect
d. All of the choices are incorrect
Recission in rescissible contracts may be an available remedy in which of the
following cases?
a. If the thing under litigation is sold with the approval of the litigants
b. If the sale of the guardian of the ward’s property is with the approval of the
court
c. If the party invoking rescission can no longer return what he may be obliged to
return
d. None of the choices
d. None of the choices
Which of the following persons who may be placed under guardianship under the Rules
of Court is considered incapacitated to contract even if not yet placed under
guardianship?
a. Hospitalized lepers
b. Those suffering from civil interdiction
c. Prodigals
d. All of the choices
b. Those suffering from civil interdiction
Annulment, as a remedy, generally prescribes in:
a. 30 days
b. 1 year
c. 4 years
d. 10 years
c. 4 years
B, a minor, bought a house from S, of legal age. Without the fault of B, the house
burned down. In this case,
a. B can no longer ask for annulment of the sale
b. S may ask for the annulment of the sale
c. B and S must agree on the annulment of the sale
d. The loss will not be an obstacle to the action for annulment
d. The loss will not be an obstacle to the action for annulment
A, B and C are co-owners of a specific land. C sold his share to X and both A and
B want to exercise their right of redemption. In this case, which of the following
is correct?
a. Both A and B will be entitled to redeem pro-rata
b. If A’s intended use is best justified, only he shall be entitled to redeem
c. If B’s lot area is smaller, only he shall be entitled to redeem
d. If A exercised the right of redemption first, only he shall be entitled to redeem
a. Both A and B will be entitled to redeem pro-rata
B, a 17 year-old boy purchased food from a restaurant. What is the status of the
contract of sale?
a. Valid
b. Voidable
c. Rescissible
d. Unenforceable
b. Voidable
If a buyer already paid 8 years’ worth of installment, his Cash Surrender Value
shall be:
a. 50%
b. 55%
c. 60%
d. 65%
d. 65%
In real estate mortgage, the mortgagor can sell the mortgaged property –
a. With the oral or written consent of the mortgagee.
b. With the written consent of the mortgagee.
c. With court order.
d. Even without the consent of the mortgagee.
d. Even without the consent of the mortgagee.
First Statement: Pledge is a consensual contract
Second Statement: The obligation under a pledge is unilateral
a. Both statements are correct
b. Both statements are incorrect
c. Only the first statement is correct
d. Only the second statement is correct
d. Only the second statement is correct
In this contract, future obligations may be covered without need of a separate or
new agreement:
a. Pledge
b. Real Estate Mortgage
c. Chattel Mortgage
d. All of the choices
b. Real Estate Mortgage
Lorenzo de Medici issued a check to Cesare Borgia drawn against Florence Bank. When
the date on the check arrived, Cesare presented the check for payment. To his
surprise, Florence Bank dishonored the check since a Stop Payment Order was issued
therefor at the request of Lorenzo. In this case,
a. Lorenzo may not be prosecuted for violating BP Blg. 22 because he is not the
drawer thereof.
b. Lorenzo may be prosecuted for violating BP Blg. 22 if the check would have been
dishonored for insufficiency of funds if there was no Stop Payment Order.
c. Lorenzo may not be prosecuted for violating BP Blg. 22 even if there were
insufficiency of funds since there was a Stop Payment Order.
d. Lorenzo may be prosecuted for violating BP Blg. 22 whether the check would have
been dishonored by insufficiency of funds or not since the check was already
dishonored because of the Stop Payment Order.
b. Lorenzo may be prosecuted for violating BP Blg. 22 if the check would have been
dishonored for insufficiency of funds if there was no Stop Payment Order.
Knowledge of insufficiency of funds in BP Blg 22 would be presumed if the check was
presented within __ days from the date of the check
a. 30
b. 60
c. 90
d. 120
c. 90