Revolutions Flashcards
Marxist Theory
Three main components:
1. Economic factors
- economic hardships push people to revolt
- capitalism as oppressive, exploitative, causing crises due to overproduction/competition
- Social factors
- modernization causes social changes facilitating revolutions
- urbanization aids communication, trade unions - Class consciousness
- emergence of strong class-based identity
- awareness of common grievances
- necessary for communist rev, key factors preventing Marxism
Grievance-Based Theory
Marxism’s economic grievances as fundamental cuase of revolutions inspired many scholars
- the state of mind of the masses as the main cause
- can be ethnic, political, cultural, etc
- Tocqueville argued revolutions are more likely when livelihoods are improving, since expectations rise as well
Ted Gurr’s “Why Men Rebel”
- Popular theory of revolutions in the 1970s with clear link to Tocqueville
- Relative Deprivation: Says it is relative hardship, not absolute hardship, that causes people to revolt
– Frustration-aggression mechanism - It is people with high expectations that have been trampled who are likely to revolt
– The most impoverished don’t have expectations so don’t become frustrated, therefore don’t revolt without encouragement
Mobilization
- By late 1970s, moved from grievance-based to mobilizational resource focused
- Similar to SM
- Common today
- What allows people to revolt
- Assumes there are always people with motivations to revolt, but only some have means of and opening to revolt
Skocpol’s “States and Revolutions” (1979)
- Theory of social revolutions – Offers an analysis of the causes of the French, Russian, and Chinese Revolutions
– Also considers several failed revolutions to see how they differed with these successful revolutions - Research Question: What causes some social revolutions to be successful in pre-modern agrarian states?
– Her argument highlights two (or three) common determinants - (1) State Breakdown: Most important factor
– Must be weakened for a social revolution
– When states don’t break down, they are able to squash rebellions
– Foreign Pressure: Notes that international pressure played a very important role in causing state breakdown in all three cases - Political Process Theory: This element of Skocpol conforms to the Political Process Theory of SMs
– Tilly was one of her advisors - (2) Peasant Rebellion: Important because of her focus on pre-industrial revolutions
– Peasant revolts dependent on two conditions promoting mobilizational resources and allowing them to exploit them - (a) Cohesion of peasants
- (b) Autonomy of peasants from landlords
- (3) Marginal Elites: Skocpol only discusses this briefly, noting they provide leadership for the revolutionary movement
– Help organize and lead movement - Doesn’t deny that grievances motivate revolutions
– Implicit in argument
– Peasants and marginalized elites disgruntled - What’s most important is structural conditions that allow these grievances to be put into action
– State breakdown, autonomous peasantry with mobilizational capabilities, movement leadership with mobilizational resources at their disposal
Goodwin’s Take on States and Revolutions
- (1) States affect mobilization and motives of revolutionary movements
– Skocpol just focuses on mobilization - (2) Considers several aspects of states that affect mobilization and motive
– Not just state breakdown
Goodwin’s characteristics whether state contains or provokes revolutions
- Mixed Effects: Claims three state characteristics affect whether states contain or provoke revolutions
- (1) Inclusion-Exclusion: Ties between state and societal actors, ability of societal actors to participate in politics
– Affects revolution in two ways - No Other Way: Exclusion promotes revolution because people feel they can’t influence politics
– Only way to influence politics is revolution - Grievances: People dislike systems that don’t give them a say, so want to overthrow exclusive systems
- Importance of Democracy: Suggests democracy limits revolutions through inclusion
- (2) Bureaucratic-Patrimonial: Goodwin sees patrimonialism as personal rule, where power is endowed in the person, not the rules
– Like Weber (Evans), believes patrimonialism has very negative effects organizational capacity of states
– Bureaucracy promotes organizational capacity - Revolutions are more likely to occur when states are organized patrimonially for three reasons:
- (1) Patrimonial states aren’t easily reformed
- (2) Patrimonial states have less capacity for services and are usually more coercive—grievances
- (3) Patrimonial states have less capacity to stop revolts
- (3) High or Low Infrastructural Power: infrastructural power involves the physical presence of states throughout the territory
– Revolts are more successful when state isn’t present
– Revolutions require autonomous space to organize - State can’t contain
- Summary: (1) Exclusion creates grievances (provokes revolt), (2) Patrimonialism creates grievances and limits ability of states to contain revolt, (3) Infrastructural power limits ability of states to contain revolt
- Suggests that states are key to understanding revs.
Goldstone: Population and Revolution
- Goldstone: Highlights three main mechanisms through which population growth contributes to revolutions
- (1) Decline in State Finances:
– Population growth contributes to inflation, lowers state revenue because resources are spread thinly
– Weakens the state, makes possible revolution - (2) Elite Divisions: Population growth causes growing competition among the elites
– Only limited number of elite positions
– More and more elites left out when populations grow
– Notes that aspiring yet frustrated elites often organize revolutionary movements
– Creates grievances—Like Gurr’s theory - (3) Grievances and Mass Mobilizational Potential:
– Grievances: Peasants severely hit by pop. growth - Especially, shortage of land
- Grievances motivate revolt
– Pop. growth land shortage promote urbanization - Facilitates mass mobilization by having many people living and interacting with one another
- Goldstone’s Conclusion: With population growth continuing today, we should expect revolutions to be increasingly common