revision social psych Flashcards
What does social psych include?
- Social thinking (the self, social beliefs and judgements, attitudes and behaviors)
- Social influence (persuasion, conformity and obedience)
- Social relations (aggression, attraction and intimacy, helping)
- Groups and identities (small group processes, social categorization and social identity, prejudice, intergroup relations, and conflict)
- How are we attracted to people and why?
what is gestalt psych?
- A holistic theory of mind and brain focusing on how these actively structure our perceptions and impressions. It emphasizes that one needs to look at the comprehensive situation to fully understand the human conscious experience “the whole is more than the sum of its parts”
- K. Koffka
- W. Kohler
- K. Lewin
what is wolerpsychologie? also known as folk psychology
- Sometimes called mass psychology, folk psychology, or “the psychology of the people”. It claims that people who belong to the same social group tend to think in the same way, holding collective beliefs, norms and values
- W. Wundt
- Those mental products which are created by a quality of human life are therefore explicable: we cannot understand them in the terms of individuals
- Three objects we must consider: two people and the relationship between them
what is positivism?
- Comte is best known for his claim that social phenomena can be studied by the same methods as those used in natural science since there are general laws existing in all sciences, and the aim for the researchers is to reveal them by “positivistic” methods
- Positivism posits that true knowledge can be achieved only through sense perceptions and empirical investigations
- This is the view that believes scientific knowledge is the only authentic knowledge
what are the 4 main types of positivism?
- Social positivism – reform the society to prevent moral and political anarchy through understanding the natural laws
- Evolutionary positivism – evolution is the general principle that can unify all fields of knowledge
- Critical positivism – the distinction between things and concepts (mental images of things) is ill founded, and in pure experience the things are not distinguishable from their mental image
- Logical positivism – reform of education, university, philosophy, and art. The final goals was the construction of a “constitutive system” in which every statement is reduced to the concepts of lower level
what was the first social experiment?
- N. Triplett
- Social facilitation: people in social settings perform better than when by themselves
- 40 children playing a simple game in pairs and alone, they were asked to wind the reel on a small fishing wheel as quickly as possible 150 times and they were timed accordingly. He wanted to test if performance would be enhanced in the presence of other people doing the same task
- Results: those who worked in pairs turned the wheel 1% faster
- was regarded as controversial
what is behaviorism?
- Stimulus > response
- Watson and Skinner
- How we can study humans based on the connections between the stimulus and response without understanding whatever is in between “black box” (interior processes)
what was the crisis in social psych?
- Late 1960s and 70s, serious questions were being asked about the direction of the discipline and how well it reflected and acknowledged the social, historical, cultural and political concerns and values of the people it sought to study.
- 2 main criticisms:
1. Over reliance on experimental methods at the expense of more naturalistic approaches such as observation and interviewing
2. Excessive emphasis on individuals as individuals rather than as parts of more complex social, historical, cultural, and political contexts - “there is no psychology of groups which is not essentially and entirely a psychology of individuals” (G. Allport, 1924)
what is cognitivism?
- U. Neisser
- 1967, cognitive psychology
- 1976, cognition and reality
what are the levels of explanation? (Doise, 1976)
- Intrapersonal – individual
- Interpersonal – what happens between an individual and another (relationship with others)
- Intragroup – within groups (you behave differently in different groups based on the role you have in the group)
- Intergroup (ideological) – what happens between groups, we can see cultural differences (individualism vs collectivism)
what is the social identity theory?
- H. Tajfel used experiments to investigate how identity and behavior are influenced by the social groups to which one belongs
- How we behave in social situations and how we differ to things we may do individually
- He suggests that groups are part of our identity and self-esteem
- Group membership
i) In-group: people within our social group
ii) Out-group: people or groups outside of our group - Social categorization: where we sort similar people and objects so that we are able to understand and identify them – leads to prejudice
- social identification: this is where people modify their behavior, attitudes and beliefs to match the group that they belong to
- social comparison: where we compare our in-group with other groups to affirm our identity – helps maintain self esteem
what is critical social psych?
- A movement promoting a social psychology that:
i) Recognizes its own political, social and historical situatedness, and that of its researchers and participants
ii) Pursues social change and reform
Social psychology and human values
- Choice of research topics
- As the object of social psychological analysis
- Psychological concepts contain values
- The subjective aspects of science
- Implicit values are NOT bad, they are natural and inevitable
- “scientific approach” means to make efforts to:
a) Recognize our values
b) Make them explicit
c) Use systematic observation, empirical data, and experimentation to check our ideas against reality
Invariant and culturally-specific aspects of social processes
- The norm of trust
- The norm of truth
what is the hindsight bias?
- The tendency to exaggerate, after learning an outcome, one’s ability to have foreseen it
- The “I knew it all along” phenomenon
- Common sense usually is right: after the fact. We therefore easily deceive ourselves into thinking that we know and knew more than we do and did
Approaches to doing research
- Quantitative: aimed at studying the relationships between variables. Variables are expressed numerically and their relationships are explored via statistical analysis. Pursues the systematic measurement of phenomena, often in controlled lab settings, more predictions about the outcome of research, aims to establish general laws and principles about types of phenomena. Inductive method, positivism and the idea that psychological variables can be reliably measured
- Qualitative: based on the interpretation of qualitative data, not statistical analysis of numerical data (the use of words, text, observation. Focus on the interpretation of phenomena as emerged in naturalistic, unconstrained situation, aims to provide a thorough description and understanding of the specific phenomena under investigation. Often lacks hypotheses. Constructivism. The Rosenberg self-esteem scale (Rosenberg, 1965)
- Mixed methods research integrates the quantitative and qualitative approaches into single studies: difficult method and complicated to publish
Main stages in the quantitative approach to research:
Research question > theory > hypothesis > method
Research methods:
Theory > hypothesis > correlational (ex. survey) and experimental research (ex. Milgram’s experiments on obedience)
Correlational research: exploring associations
- The study of the naturally occurring relationships among variables
- Questionnaires are the most used measurement instruments
- Considerations for questionnaire design:
i) Nature of sample: is it representative?
ii) Order of questions: may produce bias
iii) Response options: may guide responses
iv) Wording of questions
v) Validity and reliability of measures we use (psychometrics)
Sampling strategies
- Random sampling
- Systematic sampling
- Stratified sampling
- Cluster sampling
- Opportunity/convenience sampling
- Snowball sampling
- Theoretical/ principled/ purpose sampling
Association vs causation
- Associations indicate a relationship
- They cannot necessarily tell us whether changing one variable will cause changes in another
Huesmann et al (2003). Longitudinal relations between children’s exposure to TV violence and their aggressive and violent behavior in young adulthood
- What is the research outcome of interest? To see if children become aggressive and violent in adulthood from the influence of violent tv shows in their childhood
- What were the variables that researchers expected to be associated w the outcome? The extent to which the children viewed those characters as realistic
- How did the researchers address the alternative explanation? Being aggressive in early childhood has no effect on increasing males’ exposure to media violence as adults and only a small effect for females
- Can we argue for a causal relationship among the variables? No, we cannot be sure if its causal because there may be alternative explanations and other variables. We did not have an experimental research to control (manipulate variables ex. Time) or place random assignment. This study is correlational
Experimental research
- Independent variable: the experimental factors that a researcher manipulates
- Dependent variable: the variable expected to be dependent on the manipulation or change in the independent variable(s)
- Control: manipulating variables
- Random assignment: this will lead to ruling out any confounding factor, we need large samples for this to function effectively
- Experiments: in the health field, these are called Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs)
- Quasi-experiments: natural experiments – the researcher does not directly manipulate the independent variable for practical or ethical reasons. Field experiments – the researcher can manipulate the independent variable, but no random assignment and no full control of confounding variables
- The blind man experiment
Qualitative research
- Research question formed in a way that allows a free exploration of the issues
- Purposive or theoretical sampling
- Researcher has an active role in interacting with participants
- Data collection: interview, focus groups, observation, text (newspapers, diaries, transcripts, the internet)
Qualitative data analysis
- Grounded theory
- Discourse analysis
- Critical discourse analysis
- Interpretive phenomenological analysis
Research ethics:
- Milgram’s experiment
- Stanford prison experiment
The sense of self
- Develops in children within the second year of age (unable to recognize themselves in the mirror)
- Universal characteristics: uniqueness, continuity, distinction between I and me
The self and the social world
- Spotlight effect
- Illusion of transparency
- Social surroundings affect our self-awareness
- Self-concern motivates our social behavior
- Social relationships help define our self
Self-concept: who am I?
- Self schemas: beliefs about self that organize and guide the processing of self-relevant information
- Self-reference: the tendency to process efficiently and remember well information related to oneself, richer elaboration of memories and better organization of memories
- Possible selves: images of what we dream of or dread becoming in the future
- Self-discrepancy theories (Higgins, 1987). When there is discrepancy between self-concept and own ought self usually leads to feeling guilty, shame, or anxiety. Discrepancy between self-concept and own ideal self may generate disappointment, lack of pride
- Self-domains: actual self, ideal self, ought self
- Standpoints on the self: your own and a significant other’s (ex. Mother etc.)
- Combining self-domains with standpoints will define six basic types of self-state representations
- Individualism vs collectivism
- Self-knowledge: Johari window. The mental processes that control our social behavior are distinct from the mental processes through which we explain it
Determinants of the self
- Roles
- Social identities
- Comparisons with others
- Successes and failures
- Others’ judgements
- Surrounding culture
- experiences
Couple social comparisons
- People with high couple perceived superiority were significantly more satisfied with their couple relationship than people with low CPS
Self-construal as independent or interdependent
- Independent: self acknowledges relationships with others
- Interdependent: more deeply embedded in others
- (Markus and Kitayama 1991)
Self-esteem
- A person’s overall negative or positive self-evaluation or sense of self-worth
- Self-esteem motivation: we are highly motivated to maintain our self-esteem
- The “dark side” of self-esteem: when you feel your self-esteem is threatened and often react by putting others down, sometimes with violence
- Narcissism: uncontrolled, compulsive self-love, depends on external cues and can be easily threatened
- Secure self-esteem: confidence that leads to less defensiveness, less judgement towards others and more wellbeing
Perceived self-control
- Self-efficacy: one’s sense of competence and ability to handle different situations and produce an intended result
- Locus of control: a person’s belief about who or what is responsible for what happens. Can either be internal or external
- Learned helplessness vs self-determination
- Learned helplessness is the hopelessness and resignation learned when one perceives no control over repeated bad events
- Uncontrollable bad events > perceived lack of control > learned helplessness
- The costs of excess choice: an excess of freedom (Schwartz, 2000, 2004) causes decreased life satisfaction and increase clinical depression, too many choices can lead to paralysis or “the tyranny of freedom”
Systems promoting personal control promoting health and happiness:
- Prisons
- Workplaces
- Residential care
- Homeless shelters
How self-serving bias works
- Ex. Attributing one’s success to ability and effort, failure to luck and things external > I got the A in history because I studied hard, I got the D in sociology because the examinations were unfair
Perceiving our social world
- Priming: activating particular associations in memory, example associating towel, shower, and shampoo > so_p (soap)
- Categorical thinking: when we perceive someone in terms of their social belongings and memberships
- Belief perseverance: persistence of one’s initial conceptions, as when the basis for one’s belief is discredited but an explanation of why the belief might be true survives
- Constructing memories of ourselves and our worlds: misinformation effect: incorporating “misinformation” into one’s memory of the event, after witnessing an event and receiving misleading information about it. Reconstructing our past attitudes and past behavior
Cruel or kind?
- Myron Rothbart and Pamela Birrell (1977) had university students assess the facial expression of a man
- Some were told he was a leader responsible for barbaric medical experiments on concentration camp inmates dure the second world war > judged him as cruel
- Those who were told he was a leader in the anti-nazi underground movement > judged him as kind