Revision class Flashcards
Invitation to treat
is not capable of being accepted
invitation for offers and open to negotiations
Pattridge V Crittenden - advertisements.
Gibson V Manchester cc
“may prepared to sell”
Invitation to treat
Boots V Pharmaceutical
Goods on display
Invitation to treat
Entores V Miles Far East
Acceptance must be communicated
must mirror the offer and agree on the same terms.
mirror image rule.
An offer
an expression of willingness to be bound on specific terms if accepted.
Oral/ written or by conduct
Taylor v Laird
An offer must be communicated to the offeree
Ships captain
Hilla v arcos
An offer
Must be certain, i.e
Include Terms
Term was vague but industry standard
Destroys an offer (4)
Lapse of time
Rejection / Counter Offer
Acceptance
Revocation
Stilk V Myrick
Consideration
Performance of existing duty is not good contractual consideration for a new promise
Doing 2 men’s work
Acceptance
- parties are both in agreement and have accepted each others terms.
Can be accepted via postal rule
Silence can not be taken as acceptance
Felthouse v Brindley
Butler Machine Tool v Ex-cell-o
Acceptance
It can be through conduct (took delivery)
Battle of the forms
Postal rule
Acceptance on posting rather than when received
Postal rule - must be agreed between the parties that they can use this form of communication. Stamped Property and Addressed properly. Acceptance is when it has been posted.
Adam V Lindsell
Currie v misa
Consideration
Price paid for a person’s promise
Benefit and detriment
Consideration is something of value which is exchanged between the parties
both parties must contribute something of value
they must each suffer a detriment and a benefit
cannot be a gift
Exchange of promises
Currie v misa
Two types of consideration
executed
and
Executory
Doctrine of privity
Tweedle V Atkinson - only parties to the contract are bound by the contract
Contract rights of third parties act 1999
Special knowledge or skill
greater knowledge on the area such as a car specialist it is more likely to be a contractual term
Oscar Chess v Williams
Past consideration
Not good
Re McKardle
Exception to past consideration not being good consideration
Performing service - doctrine of implied assumpisit
Lampleigh v Braitwait
Consideration
Need not be adequate, must be sufficient, tangible & have value (2)
Thomas v Thomas
chappel v nestle
implied terms
statutory rights, such as Consumer Right Act 2015
by custom or trade
in fact or in law or by the courts
Consideration
Existing DUTY is not good consideration - the exception
Harris & Sheffield United - police
Over and above
Performance of existing DUty is not good contractual consideration for a new promise
Stilk V Myrick
they had gone beyond their existing CONTRACTUAL duty
Hartley v ponsonby (4 mens work, danger)
was entitled to the money owed