REVISION Flashcards
What is research?
A systematic way of asking questions, a systematic method of enquiry
What are the characteristics of research?
systematic logical empirical reductive replicable
Name the 4 types of research
exploratory
descriptive
explanatory
predictive
what is exploratory research?
Used when there is little or no prior knowledge of a topic.
To become familiar with basic facts, settings, and concerns; To create a general picture of conditions; To look for clues about a phenomena.
Generate new ideas, concepts, or hypotheses.
Formulate and focus questions for future research.
what is descriptive research?
Provide a detailed, highly accurate picture
Locate new data that contradict past data; To categorise or classify or clarify a sequence of steps or stages; Report on the background or context of a situation
Little attempt to explain the results
what is explanatory research?
Is involved in explaining why something happens; Looking for causal relationships between concepts; Link issues with a general principle
Extend a theory
Support or refute an explanation or prediction
Determine which of several explanations is best
what is predictive research?
forecast future phenomena, based on findings suggested by explanatory research
who carries out research?
academics, government agencies, commercial companies, consultants, managers
name the steps of the traditional method (inductionism)
i) Observation and Experiment
ii) Inductive generalisation
iii) Hypothesis
iv) Attempted verification of hypothesis
v) Proof or disproof
vi) Knowledge
what is the problem of observation in inductionism?
physical characteristics, experience, sociological factors, culture
what is the problem of the inductive process in inductionism?
the arriving at scientific laws by repeated observation - generalising from observation is not logical
what is falsification?
where theories must be exposed to refutation (not agreement)
what are the steps of Popper’s method of falsification?
i) Problem (usually to rebuff current theory)
ii) Proposed solution (new theory)
iii) Deduction of testable propositions
iv) Tests (to falsify new theory)
v) Choose between old and new theories
what are the problems with poppers method?
Newtonian/Einsteinian physics?
Limitations of observations (objective/subjective?)
Human subjective inferences (Collins and Pinch, 1993)
Theories usually complex
Many current theories would have been discarded
what was Thomas Kuhn’s revolutions? (1962)
he suggested that science can be split into normal science and revolutionary science
what is normal science?
Increases precision of measurement
Adds additional clauses to already known theories
Is ‘conservative’
what is revolutionary science?
When anomalies to current theories become too ‘serious’
‘Crisis’ and new paradigm/concepts
Science moves forwards in leaps? (e.g., theory of evolution)
what is Imre Lakatos’ research programmes?
More ‘realistic’ view of Science
‘Naive’ induction/falsificationism too simple
Scientists do not abandon theories because of one or two
falsifications
Scientific progress is a contest between rival theories (and
modifications) with the world as a referee
Long time period to decide
what are the steps of the scientific method?
i) Define Problem
ii) Read previous literature
iii) Define Hypotheses (Null hypothesis “no difference” “no effect”)
iv) Test the theory (try to falsify null hypothesis)
v) Discuss results in comparison to competing theories
vi) Conclude which theory is best
what is the aim of experimental design?
aim to control confounding variables
what are confounding variables?
- can cause false results
- alter systematically with IV so experimenter not sure whether changes in DV are due to IV or confounding
- controlled by experimenter
- E.g researching whether a lack of exercise has an effect on weight gain, confounding variable would be food consumption
what are the characteristics of a lab experiment?
well controlled but lacks realism
what are the characteristics of a field experiment?
realistic but less well controlled
Describe Independent Groups Design - Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT)
Subjects divided into groups by strict randomisation; Check that the two groups do not differ significantly (by chance) in age, weight etc. Potentially confounding variables.
describe Independent Groups Design - Pre-existing groups
E.g. elite v novice, patient v control, subjects selected who are on average similar on confounding variables.
describe Matched-Pairs Design – Pre-existing groups design
E.g. Each participant in a group of adolescents (10-20 yrs) with hypermobility is matched to an adolescent of the same gender, age and social-economic background.
E.g. Physical activity levels in adolescents with and without hypermobility (survey).
describe repeated Measures Design
Same subjects are tested under each condition. Subject is own control!
describe design with combination of multiple groups and multiple conditions
E.g. Novice-expert differences in the effect of anxiety on penalty accuracy.
This can be described as a 2 (pre-existing groups) x 2 (conditions) design.
how d you control for fatigue, learning effect, change in concentration etc in repeated measures?
- randomisation of conditions
- Quasi randomisation
- Counterbalancing
Give an example of quasi randomisation
e.g., first participant through the door does A first, next participant does B first
name the 2 specific sources of error by participants knowing which group they are in
Hawthorne effect
John Henry effect
what is the hawthorn effect?
experimental group perform better as they know they are being tested
case of a confounding variable
due to the personal interaction between experimenter and experimental group subjects
what is the John Henry Effect?
control group tries to be better and succeeds
what is a blind study
Experimenters know which participants receive the manipulation and which the placebo; the participants do not.
what is a double blind study
Niether experimenters nor subjects know who is receiving the manipulation / placebo
what is a placebo used for
To control for socio-psychological subject-investigator effects, the control group often gets a Placebo.
The placebo has all the characteristics of the manipulation, apart from the one aspect that is investigated.
name sources of error (experiment)
selection bias assignment bias rating or halo effect subject researcher interaction experimenter bias instrumentation statistical regression post hoc error
what is validity
a test is said to be valid if it measures what it claims to measure
define homoscedasticity
error is constant
define heteroscedasticity
error increases/decreases with size of variable measured
what is internal validity
did the manipulation of the IV really cause the change in the DV
Give some threats to internal validity
selection - is the control group comparable to experimental
outside events- did something happen between measuring in one condition and measuring the other
repeated testing - learning effect
loss of concentration
instrumentation
drop out
experimenter vias
what is external validity
can you generalise your findings to other people, situations tc
what is ecological validity
a time of external validity
do lab based results generalise to the real world
what is content related validity
appropriate content
what is criterion related validity
relationship to other measures
what is face validity
does the test appear to test what it aims to test
what is concurrent validity
does the relate to an existing similar measure
what is construct validity
does the test relate to underlying theoretical concepts
what is predictive validity
does the test predict later performance on a related criterion
what is reliability
a measure of whether a test would give the same results if it was administered to the same sample at 2 different times
how do you establish reliability
stability - tet retest separated by time interval
alternate forms - 2 equivalent forms of the test given to same subjects
internal consistency - test split in to 2
what is the Bland Altman plot
a method to compare 2 measurement techniques. the differences between the 2 techniques are plotted against the averages of the 2 techniques
looks at the mean of the 2 numbers and plots that against the difference between the 2 number
middle red line - systematic bias
outer red lines- mean
what is inter rater reliability / objectivity
a measure f how objective the results are
if 2 experimenters carried out the same test on the same sample, would the same results be obtained
what are descriptive statistics
measures of central tendency
measures of data spread
distribution of the data
what are the measures of central tendency
mode
median mean