Revision Flashcards

1
Q

What are some characteristics of qualitative research?

A
  • Often takes place in naturally-occurring settings
  • Structure is flexible and emergent
  • Seeks to understand an individuals experience
  • Often subjective, and biased
  • Often N = small
  • Data is collected with general forms, and emerging questions
  • Is often text analysis – with a focus on describing themes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Strengths of qualitative research?

A
  • May identify the variables or suggest the hypotheses to be tested in subsequent research
  • May develop new theories
  • May challenge the status quo and identify new directions of inquiry
  • Provides rich descriptions of complex phenomena
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Limitations of qualitative research?

A
  • May be seen as less credible by administrators/funding bodies
  • Longer time for both data collection and analysis
  • More difficult to compare findings across studies
  • Can’t account for cause and effect relationships
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are some characteristics of quantitative methodologies?

A
  • Description of relationships between variables, or group differences
  • Asks narrow questions
  • Analyses numbers using statistics
  • Often N = large
  • Often conducted in laboratory or tightly controlled circumstances
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are some strengths of quantitative methodologies?

A
  • Test and validate theories
  • Establish hypotheses before collecting data
  • Can generalise findings
  • Can make predictions from findings
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are some limitations of quantitative methodologies?

A
  • May not reflect the ‘real world’
  • Miss phenomena
  • Findings may be too abstract to be useful
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is mixed methods research?

A
“the class of research where the researcher mixes or combines quantitative
and qualitative research techniques, methods, approaches, concepts or
language into a single study”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Characteristics of mixed methods research?

A
  • collects and analyzes persuasively and rigorously both qualitative and quantitative data (based on research questions)
  • mixes the two forms of data concurrently, sequentially, or embedding one
    within the other
  • gives priority to one or to both forms of data
  • uses these procedures in a single study or in multiple phases of a program of study
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What research problems fit mixed methods?

A
  • One data source may be insufficient
  • Initial quantitative results need to be explained
  • Exploratory findings need to be generalized
  • A secondary method is needed to enhance a study’s primary method
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are some strengths of the mixed methods design?

A

• Provides strengths that offset the weaknesses of both quantitative and
qualitative research
• Provides more evidence
• Helps answer questions that cannot be answered by one approach alone
• Provides a bridge between quantitative and qualitative researchers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are some challenges of the mixed methods design?

A

The Question of Skills

  • Experience with quantitative research
  • Experience with qualitative research
  • Solid grounding in mixed methods research
    2. The Question of Time and Resources
  • Time to collect and analyze quantitative and qualitative data
  • Resources to collect and analyze both quantitative and qualitative data
  • Personnel and skills to complete the study
    3. . The Question of Convincing Others
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Best world view for mixed methods?

A

Pragmatism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

5 reasons for employing a mixed methods design?

A
  1. Triangulation
  2. Complementarity
  3. Development
  4. Initiation
  5. Expansion
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are the major 6 mm design?

A
  1. Convergent parallel design
  2. Explanatory sequential design
  3. Exploratory sequential design
  4. Embedded design
  5. Transformative design
  6. Multiphase design
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is a Convergent Parallel Design? What does the researcher do? What is its purpose and when should you choose this design?

A

The researcher:
- Collects quantitative and qualitative data concurrently
- Analyses the two data sets separately
- Mixes the two databases by merging the results during interpretation (and sometimes
during data analysis)

Purposes:

  • Obtain a more complete understanding from two databases
  • Corroborate results from different method
Choose this design if:
- Need to collect both types of data
in one visit to the field
- Both types of data have equal
value for understanding the
research problem
- Have quantitative and qualitative
research skills
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is a Explanatory Sequential? What does the researcher do? What is its purpose and when should you choose this design?

A

The researcher:
- Starts by collecting and analysing quantitative data
- Collects and analyses qualitative data in a second phase as a follow-up to the quantitative results
- Connects the phases by using the quantitative results to shape the qualitative research
questions, sampling, and data collection

Purposes:
- To use qualitative data to help explain quantitative results that need further exploration
- To use quantitative results to purposefully
select best participants for qualitative study

Choose this design if:
- Researcher and research problem
are quantitatively oriented
- Know important variables and
instruments are available
- Participants available for second
data collection
- Have time to conduct two phases
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Strengths and Challenges of Convergent Parallel design?

A

Strengths:

  • Intuitive
  • Efficient
  • Lends itself to teams
Challenges:
- Requires substantial effort and
expertise
- Issues related to the samples
and sample sizes
- Difficult to converge two sets of
different data
- How to resolve discrepant
results?
18
Q

Strengths and challenges of the Explanatory

Design?

A
Strengths: 
- Appealing to quantitative researchers
- Straightforward to implement two phases
- Final report can be written in
two phases

Chellenges:
- Two phases require lengthy time to implement
- Difficult to secure approval when second phase cannot be specified before first phase complete
- Need to decide what results to follow
up

19
Q

What is a Exploratory Sequential? What does the researcher do? What is its purpose and when should you choose this design?

A

The researcher:
-Collects and analyses qualitative data first followed by quantitative data
- Analyses the qualitative data and uses results to build to the subsequent quantitative phase
- Connects the phases by using the qualitative results to shape the quantitative phase by specifying research questions and variables, developing an instrument,
and/or generating a typology

Purposes:

  • To first explore because variables, theories, hypotheses not known
  • To develop an instrument or typology that is not available
  • To assess whether qualitative themes generalize to a population

Choose this design if:
- Researcher and research problem
are qualitatively oriented
- Important variables not known and instruments not available
- Have time to conduct two phases
- Have limited resources and need to collect and analyse one data type at a time

20
Q

Strengths and challenges of a Exploratory Sequential design?

A

STRENGTHS:
- Straightforward to design, implement, and report
- Quantitative component can make the qualitative approach more acceptable to quantitative-biased
audiences
- Researcher produces a product,
such as an instrument

CHALLENGES:
-Two phases require lengthy time
to implement
- Difficult to specify quantitative procedures when applying for initial approval; may have to apply
twice
- Deciding the qualitative findings to use for quantitative phase

21
Q

What is a Embedded design? What does the researcher do? What is its purpose and when should you choose this design?

A

The researcher:

  • Collects and analyses quantitative and qualitative data within a quantitative research design, qualitative research design, or research procedure
  • Collection and analysis of secondary data set occurs before, during, and/or after the primary methods

Purposes:

  • To address different questions that call for different methods
  • To enhance an experiment such as by examining the intervention process
  • explaining reactions to participation
  • get a more complete understanding

Choose this design if:

  • Have expertise with the primary design
  • Are comfortable with the primary orientation
  • Have little prior experience with the supplemental method
22
Q

What are some strengths and limitations of an embedded design?

A

STRENGTHS:
- May require less time and fewer resources
- Improve the larger design with supplemental data
- Fits team approach well (different qs)
- May be able to publish results
separately

CHALLENGES:

  • Need expertise in primary design and mixed methods
  • Must specify purpose for collecting the supplemental data
  • Must decide when to collect supplemental data
  • Results are difficult to integrate
23
Q

What is a transformative design? What does the researcher do? What is its purpose and when should you choose this design?

A

The researcher:

  • Uses a theoretical-based framework to advance needs of underrepresented or marginalised populations
  • Collects and analyzes quantitative and qualitative data concurrently or sequentially

Purpose:
- To conduct research that is change oriented and seeks to advance social justice causes

Choose this design if:

  • Seeking to address issues of social justice and call for change
  • Focused on the needs of underrepresented or marginalised populations
  • Have a good working knowledge of theoretical framework
24
Q

Strengths and challenges of a Transformative

Design?

A

STRENGTHS:
- Study positioned within a transformative framework
- Help to empower individuals and bring about change
- Participants play a participatory role
- Produce results useful to
community members and credible
to stakeholders

CHALLENGES: 
-Little guidance in the literature
- Approach may need to be justified
- Must develop trust with participants and conduct
research in a culturally sensitive way
25
What is a transformative design? What does the researcher do? What is its purpose and when should you choose this design?
The researcher: - Examines an overall objective - Implements an iteration of connected quantitative and/or qualitative studies - Builds each new study on what was learned previously Purpose: - To address a set of incremental questions that advance one programmatic objective Choose this design if: - Cannot fill long-term objective with a single mixed methods study - Have experience in large-scale research - Have sufficient resources and funding
26
Strengths and challenges of Multiphase | Design?
STRENGTHS: - Flexibility to address interconnected questions - Can publish individual results while contributing to objective - Fits program evaluation and development well CHALLENGES: - Must anticipate typical challenges with concurrent and sequential approaches - Need sufficient resources, time, and effort - Effectively collaborating on a team - How to meaningfully connect individual studies
27
What is critical thinking?
- It involves making a logical and rational evaluation of research evidence - It encourages a critical examination of the evidence used to support conclusions
28
What are the key elements of critical thinking?
Scepticism - never take anything for granted, always question assumptions and conclusions Objectivity - set aside personal views and judge a researcher’s arguments or conclusions according to the logic and data that underlies them Open-mindedness - consider all sides of the argument, never ignore potential explanations or interpretations
29
What is a complex intervention?
Interventions with several interacting components - Population – who is the intervention for? - Intervention – what is it? How is it delivered? - Comparison – RCTs? What is the comparison group? - Outcomes – what are they? Primary vs secondary?
30
What are the steps in a complex interventions?
The Development-Evaluation-Implementation process 1. Develop an intervention 2. Pilot and feasibility testing 3. Evaluation (and reporting) 4. Implementation
31
What is health psychology?
Health psychology is an interdisciplinary field concerned with the application of psychological knowledge and techniques to health, illness, and health care
32
What are the Key elements of critical thinking?
Scepticism - never take anything for granted, always question assumptions and conclusions Objectivity - set aside personal views and judge a researcher’s arguments or conclusions according to the logic and data that underlie them Open-mindedness - consider all sides of the argument, never ignore potential explanations or interpretations
33
What are the 3 main ways of defining science
1. Inductivism 2. Falsification 3. Kuhn Paradigms
34
What is naive inductivism?
Science is derived from facts, Based on ‘singular statements, Multiple observations lead to ‘universal statements (laws), We generalise from singular to universal statements by induction
35
Pros and Cons of Naive Inductivism?
Two pros: - it made popular conceptions of science formal - supports the idea of objectivity Five cons: - observation guided by knowledge (e.g. Bruner and Postman, 1949) - observations guided by theory - reporting observations - logical problem of induction - induction does not = deduction
36
What is falsification?
- Falsifying evidence is more powerful than confirmatory evidence (Karl Popper) - Falsification is logical. Quicker and easier to look for disconfirmatory evidence - What we observe is guided by theory - Trail and error
37
Cons of falsification?
All based on the idea that observations are not always objective/valid n Discard the observation and not the theory? n Historically inadequate as a way of advancing knowledge n The possibility of invalid observations makes it difficult to conclusively falsify a theory
38
What is Kuhns Paradigm?
-Neither of the previous two approaches adequately -explain science. We should conceptualize science in terms of theoretical frameworks, or whole structures. The scientific process is revolutionary. It is not a gradual process. There are Four stages: pre-paradigm; normal science; crisis; and revolution. Paradigm is the crucial concept, it is a set of general laws and assumptions and standard ways of investigating things Scientific activities have a single paradigm and Kuhn considers how paradigms change over time.
39
What is Stage 1 – Pre-paradigm of Kuhns Paradigm?
- Initially there is no paradigm - Pre-paradigm is not science (because not governed by laws) - This prohibits detailed work - Outcome of this is a multitude of ideas and approaches
40
What is Stage 2 – Normal science of Kuhn's Paradigm?
- Eventually one theory dominates - This becomes ‘normal’ science - a single paradigm - research tests how well the paradigm matches and explains the natural world - individual studies test puzzles generated by the paradigm - Normal science assumes the paradigm can solve the puzzles it claims to - Disconfirming observations are therefore usually rejected (blamed on scientist/methodological problems), or treated as anomalies
41
What is Stage 3 – Crisis of Kuhn's paradigm?
Multiple anomalies lead to crisis of confidence n Anomalies are considered serious if: - they attack fundamental assumptions of the paradigm - they relate to a pressing social issue - they have challenged the paradigm for some time - there is a rival paradigm n This leads to a crisis, characterised by: - more radical attempts to solve the problem - engagement in philosophical and metaphysical disputes - scientists eventually express dissatisfaction with the paradigm
42
What is Stage 4 – Revolution of Kuhn's paradigm?
New paradigm attracts followers (religious conversion) if: - it better addresses a social need - believed it can solve puzzles of interest to the scientist - If new one takes over this is a revolution - Different puzzles seem relevant and are investigated in different ways - This new science becomes normal science and the cycle continues