Revision Flashcards

1
Q

Robinson v chief constable West Yorkshire

A

Police knock over woman chasing criminal. - established legal principle - owe doc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Blyth v Birmingham

A

Introduced reasonable person test - did action fall below reasonable person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Nettleship v Weston

A

Objective standard
Held to standard of others ( reasonably competent)

learner driver injured instructor while driving

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Orchard v Lee

A

13 year old run into supervisor in playground
no breach
would have to be careless to very high degree

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Have to consider factors such as

A
  • Degree of risk involved
  • Cost of precautions
  • Seriousness of injury
  • Importance of activity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Bolton v Stone

A

Bolton v Stone - Cricket ball, over 17ft fence 6 times in 30 years - not liable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Latimer v AEC

A
  • could not shut as cost would be huge even tho potentially dangerous
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Paris v Stepney

A
  • 1 eyed workman requested goggles lost sight in other eye - lisble - seriousness of injury
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Watt v Hertfordshire

A
  • Fireman injured by heavy jack not secure but was an emergency no breach
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What does damage suffered require?

A

Legal causation (remoteness)
Factual (but for)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Wagon mound

A

oil damage foreseeable but fire damage was not

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Caparo v Dickman

A

3 stage test
Foreseeability
Proximity
Fair, just and reasonable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Kent v Griffiths

A

ambulance didn’t respond promptly person died - liable as foreseeable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Doughty v Turner

A

Asbestos lid - molten liquid :
New chemical reaction, not foreseeable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Bourhill v young

A

pregnant woman had miscarriage after watching bus accident
not liable not close in time or space

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

MUNROE V LONDON FIRE BRIGADE

A

Prevent floodgates.
- emergency services will not be held liable for omissions only acts
Fair just and reasonable

17
Q

Donoghue v Stevenson

A

Found snail in beer - established 3 points for negligence

18
Q

What are the 3 points needed for negligence

A

Duty of care owed
Breach of duty of care
Damage suffered

19
Q

Wells v Cooper

A

Standard of care only that of reasonably skilled professional
- carpenter ,handle fell off, someone injured but average work - not liable

20
Q

Bolam v Freirn

A

Medical professionals higher standard

  • followed standard laid down by professional body to competent standard - not liable