revision Flashcards
tooth-implant prosthesis:
ADV:
DISADV:
ADV:
- cheaper
- more tx options
- cantilever elimination
- ADDITIONAL SUPPORT FOR THE TOTAL LOAD ON THE DENTITION
DISADV:
- risk of osseointegration failure
- risk of marginal bone loss
- more periodontal and prosthodontic complications
- more need for repair and maintenance
- INTRUSION OF TEETH
- risk of excessive stress on implant
most common biological complications of tooth to implant prosthesis:
periapical lesions and caries but also: -tooth fractures -fistulas -loss of osseointegration -periodontal pathology
most common technical complications of tooth to implant prosthesis:
porcelain occlusal fracture and screw loosening but also: -retention loss -cement failure -screw fracture
intrusion of teeth - percentage:
0 - 5.2%
rigid connection or non-rigid connection between teeth and implants?
rigid connection
bc the non-rigid have more technical complications
which is better; tooth-implant prosthesis or implant-implant prosthesis?
implant-implant prosthesis is better
bc of increased no of biological and technical complications with implant-tooth prosthesis
diagnostic phase planning for implant placement includes:
no of implants position of implants angulation of implants dimension needed design of finalized prosthetic rehabilitation
surgical guide use:
- for desired implant position and angulation
- for abutment dimension and angulation
- if there is a need for soft/hard tissue augmentation before or during implant placement
distance needed between two implants placed:
3 mm space
bc we want space for OH, otherwise it will fail
pink porcelain use:
high lip line - used only for aesthetics
technical complications of implant supported FPDs:
- veneer fractures -> most common
- screw loosening
- abutments/screw fracture
- implants fracture
- occlusal restoration loss
solution for a two rooted or three rooted tooth extraction:
sectioning
for a less traumatic procedure
what will be missing from the extraction site once a tooth is removed?
PDL
alveolar bone morphology depends on:
tooth size
tooth shape
events occurring during tooth eruption
erupted teeth inclination
alveolar bone morphology of long and narrow teeth:
more delicate alveolar process, in particular in the frontals, a thin, fenestrated buccal bone plate
so with thin biotype and long narrow teeth there is a thin or non-existent buccal plate
where would we see an impact of a thin or non-existent buccal plate?
in:
orthodontic movements
periodontitis
recessions
what do we expect to have when we have subgingival restoration margins in a thin biotype?
recessions
what do we expect to have when we have subgingival restoration margins in a thick biotype?
inflammation
attachment apparatus components:
periodontal ligaments
cement
alveolar bone
what will happened to the bone when there are multiple tooth extractions and then subsequent restoration with RPDs?
reduced size of ridge in both horizontal and vertical dimension
bone resorption depends on:
- thin or thick biotype
- pressure on the area
- why you lost teeth (caries or perio)
- original dimension (height and width)
- > thin bone plate (<1 mm wide) lose more dimension than plates > 1 mm wide
- not the same for everyone
- same resorption process for both single and multiple teeth being extracted
bone reduction percentages in 3m and 12m after tooth extraction:
3m: 30%
12m: 50%
clinical ramifications concerning prosthetic rehabilitation after teeth being extracted:
implants - bone augmentation
bridge - space b/w pontic/bridge?
complaints for:
anteriors: aesthetics
posteriors: food impaction
factors that will influence changes in the bone after tooth extraction:
- traumatic injuries (ex: during extraction or after an accident)
- tooth related diseases (ex: periodontitis or apical periodontitis)
classification of residual jaw shape:
In groups A and B, substantial amounts of the ridge still remain
In groups C, D, and E, only minute amounts of hard tissue remain
A and B: can place a full mouth denture or implants
Vs
C, D, E: problems with placing a denture or implant
4 different groups of jawbone quality:
Quality 1 to 4: less cortical bone, more bundle bone present
Quality 1: thick and resistant bone – very good for dentures, not very good for implants – there is no proper blood supply to the area so you might have problems with osseointegration
Vs
Quality 4: it is so soft so there is no primary stability so when you are placing an implant you might need to stop before placing the correct size, there is a lot of bleeding upon working
clinical ramifications of tooth extraction:
4 pictures
thin or thick bony plate small (incisor) or big (molar) socket bone augmentation needed implant placement food impaction problems
What do we expect to see when removing a tooth?
Bone resorption and then soft tissue follows
When you have resorption occurring, and you want to replace a missing tooth with a prosthesis, what are your concerns?
- resorption of buccal bone
- adjacent teeth recession leading to root exposure and sensitivity
- aesthetics
- food impaction
When would be the optimal time to plan the restorative treatment of a patient?
Prior to teeth extraction
which has less traumatic change after extraction?
- lower anteriors
- lower molars
- upper anteriors
- upper molars
-lower anteriors
post extraction healing stages:
- epithelial cells (fastest cells) proliferation
- keratinization covering extraction site
- bone cells (osteoclasts, osteoblasts) multiplication (so bone builds up in the socket)
- resorption (a little, especially on the buccal plate)
- bone and soft tissue loss
type 1 implant placement:
-immediate placement after extraction
- ADV: 1 surgery, less tx time, less visits (patient friendly bc you do it in 1 go), bone augmentation favorable
- DISADV: high risk procedure, need experience, inadequate soft tissue, aesthetical problems
type 2 implant placement:
- when the socket is covered with mucosa
- best solution
- after 4-8w before socket coverage with soft tissue
- ADV: good aesthetics and predictable, less tx time, favorable bone augmentation procedure, allows pathology resolution
- DISADV: 2 surgeries, not easy (the least no of disadv), more tx time than type 1, socket wall resorption
type 3 implant placement:
- when bone fill is required within the extraction socket
- after 10-16w
- ex: after big tooth extraction or huge defect (ex: periapical lesion, periodontitis, tooth fracture, huge bone loss)
- ADV: favorable bone augmentation procedure, allows pathology resolution, easier to manage mucosa during flap elevation
- DISADV: 2 surgeries, more tx time, additional resorption
type 4 implant placement:
- everything is completely healed
- when the patient asks for it or for financial reasons
- after 4m or 6-12m
- ADV: complete healing, allows pathology resolution, only minor additional change of the ridge may occur
- DISADV: 2 surgeries, more tx time, might require complicated bone augmentation procedures
flap closure methods:
1st approach: requires primary wound closure which leads to submerged healing
2nd approach: allows for a transmucosal position of implant/healing cap which leads to transmucosal healing
-> If its not that big bone augmentation, then you go to the transmucosal healing
In which clinical situation you would prefer to have healing and then bone? What would you see in your initial radiograph?
after big tooth extraction or huge defect (ex: periapical lesion, periodontitis, tooth fracture, huge bone loss)
so it’s better to wait a little bit longer
aspects evaluated during tx planning phase:
- overall tx objective
- tooth location in oral cavity (aesthetic zone or not)
- bone and soft tissue anatomy at the site
- adaptive changes of alveolar process following tooth extraction
which factors differentiate someone from having periodontitis or not?
susceptibility
genetics