Review Questions Flashcards
Where does Congress get its authority to legislate in the area of copyright?
- US Constitution
- Copyright Clause
- Article 1, section 8, clause 8
in what way is a copyright a limited monopoly?
Copyright is a limited monopoly in that it:
- preserves certain rights to only the copyright holder
- protects rights for a certain duration
- protection is of finite duration
what exclusive rights does the original copyright holder have?
- right to reproduce the work in copies or phono records
- right to prepare derivative works based on the copyrighted work
- right to distribute copies or phono records of copyrighted works to public
- right to perform publicly (for literary, musical, dramatic, choreography, pantomimes, motion pictures, and other audiovisual works)
- right to display publicly (for literary, musical, dramatic, choreography, pantomimes, pictorial, graphic, sculptural works (including images of a motion picture or other audio visual work))
- the right to perform the copyright publicly by means of a digital audio transmission (sound recordings only)
what type of works enjoy the protection of the right to publicly perform?
literary, musical, dramatic, choreography, pantomimes, motion pictures and other audio visual works
what right applies only to literary, musical, dramatic, choreography, pantomimes, pictorial, graphic, sculptural works (including images of a motion picture or other audio visual work)
the right to display publicly
what is the acronym to remember the rights of the copyright holder?
Really (reproduce) Dirty (derivative works) Divas (distribute) Perform (perform publicly) Dirty (display publicly) Plays (perform by digital audio transmission)
which rights does a copyright holder have in all types of works?
- right to reproduce
- right to prepare derivative works
- right to distribute copies or phono records to public
what is time-shifting?
- recording a show to watch at a later time
- was not archiving and was not replacing a viewing b/c you couldn’t watch at that time anyways
- comes from Sony Betamax case
What is the incentive rationale for copyright?
- benefit to the copyright holder (an incentive to do what they love)
- public interest purpose = public has access to new ideas
at what point does the author of a work which includes original expression have statutory copyright protection?
when the work is fixed in a tangible medium of expression
common law copyright
=the copyright protection that can be afforded to works when they are not covered by statutory copyright (ex. unfixed works); typically refers to state copyright law
does copyright law require novelty for a protected work?
no, copyright law requires originality
If an artist sells a painting to buyer, who owns the copyright in the painting?
The artist. The copyright rights are separate from the actual ownership of the property. If the artist intended to transfer the copyright also, then we would have to do so in a signed writing.
If you write a letter and send it to your friend, who owns the letter? Who owns the copyright in the letter?
The writer/sender of the letter owns the copyright in the letter. The friend just owns the physical letter. The friend is free to destroy the letter but can not publish it unless the letter was intended for publication.
Is a speech, saved on a hard drive but offered orally, protected by copyright? Can listeners who hear the speech transcribe it and distribute copies?
- Yes, the speech on a hard drive is protected by copyright b/c the version on the hard drive is fixed in a tangible medium of expression. A copy can be fixed in any medium except a phono record.
- Listeners who hear the speech can not transcribe it and distribute copies because that would be infringement of the distribution right.
Can a person lawfully record a live musical performance without the consent of the performers?
It seems like the answer is yes b/c those works are unfixed. However, the Act provides protection for unfixed live musical performance under the anti-bootlegging provisions. So the answer is no, a person cannot lawfully record a live musical performance w/o the consent of the performers.
what is the one type of unfixed work that still has protection under the Act?
live musical performances (anti-boot legging provisions)
What is a copy under the Copyright Act?
copies are the material objects that things are fixed in (can be any medium except phono records)
ex. write notes on paper, the copy is the piece of paper
what is a phono record under the Copyright Act?
a phonorecord is a tangible object where a sound is fixed
exception: phono records that accompany motion pictures are copies
what is general publication and why is it significant?
- general publication is when a work is made available to the public at large w/out regard to their identity or what they intend to do w/ the work; no restrictions as to how the work should be used or how future copies will be distributed
- was significant for the 1909 Act b/c publication was required for a work to gain statutory protection
historically, what is the significance of the (c)?
historically was one of the requirements in order for a work to have statutory protection
is a copyright notice required on copyrighted works?
no
what are the advantages of having a copyright notice today?
- provide notice
- potential infringer can’t claim they innocently infringed for the purpose of reducing damages
- gives the person who wants to use the work a better way to find the holder of the copyright
must a copyright claimant register his/her copyright?
no, but there are benefits:
- requirement to bring an infringement action
- greater remedies if registered at time of infringement (or w/in 3 months; can get attorneys fees and statutory damages)
may a P sue a defendant for copyright infringement if the work does not currently have a copyright protection?
no, unless P’s copyright registration has been rejected
May a P sue a D for copyright infringement if the work, at the time of the infringement, was unregistered?
yes
what is the rule of doubt?
says that the Copyright Office will review applications to make sure the requirements are satisfied for copyright protection; if they’re on the fence, they will issue the copyright and someone can later challenge it in court. The office will only really deny if they think a work is not entitled to protection
are photographs entitled to copyright protection?
Yes, because they are original works of authorship. The original elements comes from the way the photographer (deemed an author for purposes of copyright) staged the lighting, clothing, subject, setting etc
what is the originality requirement? where does it come from?
- The originality requirement is that there must be enough originality in the expression to qualify as an original work.
- Such requirement comes from §102(a) of the 1976 Copyright Act.
What is a derivative work?
a work derived from a pre-existing source
what works are in the public domain?
- works the pre-date any copyright protection
- works that did not satisfy statutory copyright
- works governed by copyright but the term expired
- work is of a type that automatically goes to the public domain (fed gov)
- non works
Does a close reproduction of a work in a new medium qualify for copyright protection as a derivative work?
No, because a change in medium is a mere trivial addition to the work. In order for the work to qualify as a derivative work, the change would have to be a substantial variation (something more than a mere trivial addition)
How does copyright law deal w/ factual compilations?
Only the original aspects of compilations are protected. In general, the Copyright Act considers compilations to be collections of facts, and facts are not copyrightable. Arrangement and selection of facts would be protected.
what relevance does the time and effort expended in creation of a work have to do w/ copyright ability? what is the sweat of the brow doctrine?
- relevance = speaks to originality
- sweat of brow doctrine = if the author had put time and energy into the work, then they should get copyright protection.
note: rejected by the court in Feist b/c it doesn’t relate to the statute or legal definition for what type of works are subject to copyright protection
Are judicial opinions subject to copyright protections? Does Westlaw’s parent company have a copyrightable interest in the judicial opinions published on Westlaw or in the West Reporters?
No, under common law, judicial opinions do not get copyright protection. West could have a copyright interest in how the opinions were arranged (subject to original elements)
what is the merger doctrine?
If the underlying idea (or system, process, or method of operation) can effectively be expressed in only one way, the idea and the expression are said to have merged and there is no copyright protection. (Baker v. Seldon)
What does Baker v. Seldon stand for?
-stands for the merger doctrine
Facts: P wrote a book about a particular accounting method. The method used a specific set of forms. D published a book w/ forms achieving the same result w/ a different arrangement of columns and headings on the forms.
Holding: forms were not copyrightable b/c there is no protection for works that serve utilitarian functions (b/c there is no expression, is just idea)
-if you have something like a form that is necessary to implement or express the idea, that is beyond the scope of copyright protection
under copyright law, what type of work is computer code?
literary work