Review Flashcards

1
Q

Classical Realism (Steven Walt - One World Many Theories)

A

> Because of human nature, states respond to anarchy by seeking to gain power and dominate others

> Hans Morgenthau is a classical realist
(stressed the virtues of a multipolar balance of power)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Neorealist Theory (Steven Walt - One World Many Theories)

A

> Ignored human nature and looked at the effects of the international system

> Anarchy would lead weaker states to balance against more powerful rivals

> Articulated by Kenneth Waltz, who unlike Morgenthau thought bipolarity was more stable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

E.H. Carr (20 Years of Crisis)

A

> Liberal and written in 1939

> Tries to find a middle ground between realism (deterministic/power/bureaucrat) and utopianism (aspirational/principles/intelectual)

> Wilsonian Liberalism failed – > but ethical international politics are possible if pursued practically

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Hans Morgenthau (6)

A
  1. Politics is governed by objective laws that have their roots in human nature.
  2. Statesmen conduct themselves in terns of interest defined as power.
  3. Interest determines political conduct within the political and cultural context which foreign policy is formulated.
  4. Prudence is the supreme virtue in international politics.
  5. Nations are entities that pursue their interests as defined by power and should not be judged by universal moral principles.
  6. Political realism rejects the legalistic-moralistic approach to international politics.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Thucydides (The Melian Dialogue)

A

> The world is anarchy (no divine intervention)

> Force trumps law (anarchy)

> States try to maximize power

> States are self-interested uniformly and act rationally (system level analysis)

> Deviation of “realist” principles is harmful (looking weak)

(State behavior similar to Mearsheimer)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

John Mearsheimer (5 Assumption)

A
  1. The World is in Anarchy
  2. States have the ability to afflict damage
  3. States can never be sure of each other’s intentions
  4. States primary goal is to survive
  5. States pursue that goal rationally

Thus — > Goal is to maximize power and other major powers will try and block emerging hegemony

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Machiavelli

A

> Holding power is the highest virtue

> It is better to be feared than loved (but don’t be hated)

> Cannot rely on love

> Must be cunning and where many hats

> Fox (traps) and the lion (strength)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Stephen Walt - Alliance Formation

A

> States form alliances to balance against threats rather than bandwagon with them. Threats, in turn, are the product of several different sources

> The instruments of “bribery” and penetration are by themselves weak determinants of alignment

> Ideology is a weaker cause of alliance formation, and ideological movements that strive for tight central authority are more likely to lead to conflict than cooperation

> In a balancing world, policies that demonstrate restraint and benevolence are best (to limit balancing)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Bentham

A

> Utilitarian philosopher (maximize happiness)

> Basically wanted world government

> States should sometimes act against their self interest

> People should be taught enlightenment principles

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Wilson 14 points

A

> Modernizes and contextualizes Kantian ideas

> World should use norms and institutions to create peace and stability

> Spread laudable ideals

> Over the long-term such institutions serve the common good

> Shades of democratic peace theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Mansfield and Snyder - Prone to violence

A

> Establishing democracy without strong institutions can create internal conflict (particularly ethnic conflict)

> Early state democracies are also more warlike

> Red flags for democracy include ethnic political lines, low literacy, and concentrated economy

> It is better to be patient and wait until a society can build a stable democracy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Singer - Levels of Analysis

A

> A good theory should describe, explain, and predict

> System analysis is abstract and deterministic – but also practical and broadly applicable

> State-level analysis is granular and nuanced, but prone to enthocentlrism and overstate differences. Hard to know what motivates behavior

> Both approaches are useful, but should be careful wehn choosing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Deutsch and J. David Singer - Multipolarity

A

> Multipolarity creates more opportunities for interaction and thus “cross balancing”’ (also attentional issues limit conflict)

> Weaken arms races but make disarmament harder

> Has some long-run issues (state creation/destruction and edge cases

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Waltz - Stability in a bipolar world

A

> Bipolarity more stable

> Reduces uncertainty because two great powers had to focus only on each other.

> Lessened conflict because each of the poles would rely mainly on its own internal resources to balance the other, eliminating the need to compete with each other over third parties

> Power–not nuclear weapons–are the cause of stability (no one will catch up soon)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Gilpin - Origins of hegemonic war

A

> Hegemonic wars are unique because they fundamentally change the IR system of power

> “Shocks” (including domestic) can bring about power changes

> Fear of eroding power and cause hegemonic war

> Major war is still possible in the modern, nuclear era

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Wohlforth - Stability in a unipolar world (hegemonic stability theory)

A

> Unipolarity is stable, enduing, and peaceful (focused on U.S.) –> Imposes order and is less uncertain

> The U.S. power advantage is overwhelming across all domains (1999)

> Counter hegemonic alliances are very hard to implement (buck passing)

17
Q

Layne - “The Unipolar Illusion

A

> Unipolarity is not sustainable

> More power = more commitments & some states expand too much

> Diffusion of technology and wealth harms hegemony

> Differential growth rates promote the emergence of new great powers

> Attempting to suppress great power emergence is self defeating (takes resources) – U.S. should exercise “strategic independence” instead&raquo_space; Goldilocks” power system

18
Q

Keohane/Nye - Power and interdipendence

A

> International networks create sensitivity and vulnerability (short vs. long term impacts)

> Lots of channels of interaction in modern world

> No clear issue hierarchy and foreign/domestic politics becomes blurred

> Devalues military power (very not realist)

> International organizations become more important (agenda setting etc.)

19
Q

Puchala and Raymond Hopkins - Regime theory

A

> Regimes are sets of norms, understandings, and convictions (colonialism)

> Single vs. diffuse (multiple issues) and Formal (treaties) vs. Informal

> Often have a distributional bias

> Help explain behavior missed by realism

> Are maintained by consensus and major shifts are driven by changes in the balance of power (sort of undermines everything)

20
Q

Ikenberry - After Victory

A

> Winning states have increasingly had incentives to exercise strategic restraint in post-war agreements to lock-in long-term influence

> Regimes are “sticky”

> Weak states like constitutional orders because it a) gives them assistance and b) avoids negotiating based on balance of power

> Regimes must be seen as fair and responsive, this restrained democracies are the best at maintaining them

21
Q

Shared assumptions of liberalism and realism

A
  • Unit of analysis is the state
    • Anarchy is the organizing principle of the international system
    • Nature of state:
      ○ Rational
      ○ Self interested
      ○ Interest defined in terms of security
      ○ Has ruling institutions that have a monopoly on violence in a given territory
    • Assume strategic interaction
      Harmony – > Cooperation (liberalism) –> Discord (realist)
22
Q

Walt — Layne — Ikenberry

A

See restraint as an important tool

Walt (States balance against threats)

Layne (Declining hegemonies don’t want to prove balancing)

Ikenberry (Restraint helps extend the power dynamics of post war regimes)