Results Flashcards
What related to higher vigor, dedication and absorption?
More frequent visits to nature environments during summer and winter as well as short distances from home to nature environments.
Also, longer visits to nature environments during the winter and longer commutes via nature realted to higher vigor and absorption.
More frequent visits to nature environments at work only related ?
To dedication.
Of the nature-related factors, only more frequent visits to nature environments at work related?
To lower burnout on the dimension of cynicism.
What was NOT related to any of the occupational well-being indicators?
The length of the visits to nature environments during summer.
What didin’t work?
The six-profile solution did not converge, despite the modifications to the number of random starts and starting values.
The BIC, VLMR and LMR supported?
A five-profile solution.
Entropy was?
higher in the two-profile solution but acceptable in every solution.
In the five-profile solution, the smallest profile included ?
8,4% of the participants.
The participants in profiles 2 and 3 are similar in regard?
these three variables: they visited nature environments during
leisure time more often than did the average of the sample, but the frequency of their nature visits at work was less than was the case for the average of the sample. The reason why the LPA identified Profiles 2 and 3 as separate is due to the fact that the participants in these profiles differ in their patterns of activities in nature environments
In profile 2?
the participants were active in nature environments in various ways: they spent time in nature in a number of different ways, such as enjoying the scenery, relaxing, gardening, sunbathing, and swimming. They exercised in nature by walking and jogging, cycling, and skiing. They also spent time in their cottage, went boating, and picked berries and mushrooms.
In contrast in profile 3?
The most common activities were enjoying the scenery and nature, and walking and jogging.
Participants in profiles 1,4 and 5 were also rather narrow in their activities since ?
they mainly enjoyed the scenery and nature, relaxed, walked, and jogged.
Based on these results the profiles can be described;
Profile 1= ?
Profile 1= High exposure (n= 66; 8%), describing frequent nature visits at work and during leisure time
Profile 2=?
Profile 2= versatile exposure (n= 171; 22%) describing frequent nature visits and versatile activity during leisure time combined with less frequent nature visits at work.
Profile 3?
Profile 3 = Unilateral exposure (n = 297; 38%), describing frequent nature visits but unilateral (yksipuolinen) activity during leisure time combined with less frequent visits at work
Profile 4=?
Profile 4 = Average exposure (n = 99; 13%), describing average frequency of nature visits at work and during leisure time
Profile 5=?
Profile 5 = Low Exposure (n = 150; 19%), describing less frequent nature visits at work and during leisure time.
The profiles differed in?
In vigor, dedication and cynicism.
In order to reduce the number of pairwise comparison?
Only the low exposure profile was compared to the other profiles (instead comparing all profiles to each other)
The participants in the high exposure profile reported?
Higher vigor, dedication and absorption and lower cynicism and inadequacy than did the participants in the low exposure profile.
Level of vigor was lower in the low exposure profile compared ?
To that of the participants in the versatile nature exposure profile and unilateral exposure profile
The participants in the low exposure profile also reported?
lower levels of dedication compared to the participants in the versatile exposure profile, the unilateral exposure profile, and the average exposure profile
In the Bonferroni corrections, the p-value is?
multiplied by the number of pairwise comparisons.
In this case, we have four pairwise comparisons.
