resulting trusts Flashcards
how does a resulting trust arise?
resulting and constructive trusts arise by operation of the law.
(imposed by the court)
what are the 3 situations when a resulting trust arises?
- where a transfer on trust wholly or partially fails but the property has been transferred to the trustee
- where a person graciously transfers property to another person
- where a person pays all or part of the purchase price for an asset
what is a resulting trust?
when property is held on trust for the person who transferred it or contributed to its acquisition.
involves the return of a beneficial interest to the original legal owner of the property or contributor to that property.
how does an automatic resulting trust arise?
where there has been some sort of failure in the creation of a transfer on trust.
effectively a default position which returns beneficial interest to the sector (giving them Saunders v vautier rights) the ability is given to collapse the trust and either retain the property or re-attempt the intended express trust
what are 4 common reasons for an automatic resulting trust to arise?
- uncertainty of subject matter
- uncertainty of objects
- non-compliance with the beneficiary principle
- surplus fund remaining at the end of the trust period
what are the 3 certainties for automatic resulting trusts?
- uncertainty of objects
- uncertainty of subject matter
- non-compliance with the beneficiary principle
how do presumed resulting trusts arise?
arise in situations where a transfer is gracious and there is no evidence that the transferor intended the recipient to receive the property as a gift. arise by way of a presumption that the transferor or contributor intended to create a trust.
how can a presumed resulting trust be rebutted?
can be rebutted with evidence that the transferor or contributor’s actual intention is inconsistent with the creation of a trust
can you use a presumed resulting trust to determine the beneficial entitlement to land acquired jointly eg, the family home?
no - in this case you need to use the common intention constructive trust
how can the presumption of a resulting trust be rebutted?
by evidence that the transferor didn’t intend the recipient to hold the property on trust for them