RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS AND EQUITABLE SERVITUDES Flashcards
Restrictive Cov vs Equit Serv (remedy distinction)
money damages: COVENANT AT LAW
injunction: EQUITABLE SERVITUDE
Restrictive covenant at law (4)
- intent (intend to run w/ land)
- notice (actual, constructive, inquiry)
- touch and concern (makes land more valuable and useful)
- privity (horizontal and vertical)
Successor in Interest (Defendant requires both for BURDEN)
VERTICAL– those who subseq take prop subj to covenant, must take FULL ESTATE
HORIZONTAL– original parties to the promise
- must share int independent of covenant
- must be conveyance btwn original
Successor in interest (Plaintiff requires one for BENEFIT)
VERTICAL– holder of any succeeding possessory estate may enforce benefit of promise as a covenant at law
Covenant at law (BURDEN enforcement) (Successor in interest is D) (4)
- intent
- notice
- touch and concern
- BOTH privities
Covenant at law (BENEFIT enforcement) (successor in interest is P) (3)
- intent
- touch and concern
- vertical privity
Equitable serv (enforcement of BURDEN to obtain INJUNCTION) (3)
- intent
- notice
- touch and concern
Equitable serv (enforcement of BENEFIT)(2)
- intent
2. touch and concern
Reciprocal Negative servitudes or “mutual right of enforcement” (subdivisions) (2)
- intent (common building plan)
2. notice
“dedication”
compel to use land as indicated by the reservation
ex. 10 acres reserved as park use, A sells to B with no restriction, city can compel to use this as park
DEFENSES (to enforcement of covenant as an Equit Serv) (4)
- UNCLEAN hands (P has made same use)
- ACQUIESCENCE ( P let neighbors do same thing on their lots)
- LACHES (P watched D build, only complained after)
- ESTOPPEL (P represented that there were no problems with Ds plan to build)
Termination of Covenants and Equit Serv (3)
- deed of release
- merger
- changed conditions (if all lots in sub are affected then the use restriction will be eliminated)