Restoration of Endodontically Treated tooth Flashcards
3 ways to assess the RCT tooth
clincal
radiographic
coronal seal and microleakage
clinical assessment of RCT tooth
- Coronal seal - restorations/crowns.
- Leakage? Caries? Extense?
- Amount of remaining tooth structure- ferrule
- Is the tooth restorable?
- Can you isolate it with rubber dam?
- Swelling
- Sinus (arrow has healed sinus)
- assess reflected and attached mucosa
- TTP
- any signs of infection at end of tooth?
- Buccal sulcus
- tender to palpation?
- Mobility – grade – note
- Increased pocketing
- periodontal disease and root fracture
when do you need a pre-treatment radiograph
indirect and direct to ensure no underlying infection or issue. Critique
8 parts radiogaphic assessment
- Root filling - length, quality of obturation e.g. voids
- Unfilled/missed root canals
- Shape of canal - post and cores
- need to assess: narrow, dentine abundance, curved?
- Patency
- fracture instruments, posts, sclerosis (access to canal)
- Bone support
- mild, moderate, severe (periodontal assess)
- Crown to root ratio (1:1.5) – ideal
- Pathology
- success tx? periapical radiolucency
- healing? resorption, perforations
voids
allow bacteria to penetrate and thrive,
why does GP appear beyond apex
through the apex – likely due to continued infection and external inflammatory resorption at apex
where should GP be sealed
GP shouldn’t be in clinical crown – trim back to ACJ (line)
issue of severe bone loss on radiograph
do not bother restoring
issue of smaller root
i.e. below ideal ration (1:1.5)
the smaller the root the less support – cannot do crown lengthening
filling deemed inadequate on clincal and radiographic assessment
Inadequate root fillings should be re-treated before prosthodontics commence
8 other consideration on assessing endo treated tooth
- When RCT done? Is it healing or has it failed?
- Was it done under rubber dam and was hypochlorite irrigant used? Gold standard for tx
- RF short or long? Weigh pros and cons of trying to extend
If:
- Cracks or fractures
- Fractured instruments
- Perforations
- Periapical pathology e.g. Cysts
- Repeated RCT’s. Implant? Alternative?
- Success rate decreases, is it sensible?
STOP - reassess - can you improve or need to replan
If in doubt refer for an opinion
Note observations /discussions in notes - legal
how long in general for RCT to heal
- generally peri apically pathology 4 years down the line – not healed.*
- Generally 2-5 years to fully heal
coronal microleakage
- Ingress of oral micro-organisms into the root canal system
- Important cause of RCT failure
- Significant in multi-rooted teeth as more canals
Root filled teeth unrestored for 3 months or longer should generally be re-root canal treated
- GP exposed for more than 3 months – contaminated by bacteria, working their way to apex – re treat
Trim GP to the ACJ and place RMGI over pulp floor and root canal openings vitrebond
- means if lining comes out GP is sealed so protecting Tx
Lining should not be too thick, allowing remainder of pulp chamber for retention and restoration GP at ACJ and pulp floor to block lateral canals
importance of coronal seal
Technical quality of the coronal restoration significantly more important for apical periodontal health than the technical quality of the root canal treatment
well seal more imp than superior RCT
issue here
swelling above lateral and central
heavily restored for 25 yo
- coronal microleakage lead to multiple problems
assess RCT in radiograph
- Within 1-2mm of radiographic apex
- Voids around master and accessory points
- “Kink” in the apical 1/3
- Radiolucency – cannot see extent
- More taken – spreading (GP of 12 removed)
- Interproximal fillings are leaking – source of infection and swelling
Coronal Microleakage?
restorations issue
spaces under mesial and distal restorations
what does this OPT show
see large infection of RCT
- cystic infection above RCT
- restorations not properly completed
- no dam likely - saliva contamination leading to infection
- discoloured, poor margins
Problems of Coronal Microleakage
5 potential problems after RCT/re-RCT
- Amount of remaining tooth structure – externally and internally
- Restoration type – will it be retained?
- Lack or no ferrule
- Wide post holes e.g. reRCT
- Endodontic complications – fractured instruments, perforations, short/long root filling
are teeth brittle after RCT
Teeth do not become more brittle after endodontic treatment” Sedgley CM & Messer HH JOE 18:332 1992
are root treated teeth more prone to fracture
“a root filled tooth with minimal loss of dentine is no more likely to fracture than a vital tooth”
after RCT are teeth as hard as non-root treated teeth
“dentine hardness is not altered after endodontic treatment”
does dehydration affect the hardness of RCT teeth
“dehydration does not appear to weaken dentine structure in terms of strength or toughness”
2 clinical choices for endo tx teeth
- Direct restoration – composite (glass ionomer class V) – Class III and IV
- Indirect restoration – crown or post crown (veneer)
impact of marginal ridges
How intact? How many you have impacts restoration choice
- Intact ->* restoration
- Lost some ->* crowns
restoration for
anterior teeth with intact marginal ridges
Direct restoration – composite
- Over access cavity
- Or interproximal
restoration for
anterior teeth with intact marginal ridges +/- discoloured crown
Direct restoration – composite bleaching (internally and externally)
If pt not happy with colour veneer (crown) – to cover discolouration
Age – crowns 8-10 years survival so young likely need to replace (chip, leak, fall out) – cycle of crowns – destructive
restoration for
anterior teeth with marginal ridges destroyed
Core build-up with crown
(post crown – last resort as many issues)
what is a post/core
- Gains intraradicular support for a definitive restoration little tooth structure existing
- Core provides retention for crown
- Post retains the core
-
Posts do not strengthen or reinforce teeth
- Preparation of the root canal for a post, weakens the tooth removing tooth structure from inside of tooth
components of post and core
- Post - placed in the root canal
- Core - is what the prosthesis is cemented to e.g. crown or bridge abutment
guidelines for post placement categories
- tooth type
- root filling length
- 4-5mm root filling apically - so apex is sealed
- post width
- No more than 1/3 of root width at narrowest point and 1 mm of remaining circumferential coronal dentine
- sufficient alveolar bone support, at least hald of post length into the root
- Mobile teeth do not place – root fractures as root not supported in bone
- minimum 1:1 post length/crown length ration
- ferrule
tooth type consideration for post placement
Incisors and canines
- post unnecessary if sufficient coronal dentine is present
- BUT Extensive loss of coronal tooth tissue the tooth will need a post as the pulp chamber and single root canal are not adequate to retain a core [Anterior teeth are subject to lateral forces whereas posterior teeth are subject to vertical forces]
Avoid in mandibular incisors due to thin/tapering/ narrow mesiodistal roots – starting the demise of the tooth
Premolars - small pulp chambers and tapering roots. Thin in mesiodistal cross-section and proximal invaginations (canine eminence – concavity in mesial aspect of 4).
- If a post is to be placed then place in the widest root canal.
Avoid in curved canals to avoid perforations! Post straight; canal not
ferrule needed for post placement
- At least 1.5mm height and width of remaining coronal dentine
what is ferrule?
Dentine collar.
- Encirclement of 1- 2 mm of vertical axial tooth structure within walls of a crown (crown margins on dentine)
Prevents tooth fracture
- If crown margin is not placed onto solid tooth, root fracture significantly increased
Orthodontic extrusion or crown lengthening may be necessary to achieve this – move gingival margin apically, to move structure supra gingival – need to have long tooth, compliant pts, time
post or not?
- Upper right no – nice core
- Left – RCT and core before looks like – build core on tooth as enough ferrule for crown margins so restore with crown – avoid a post
3 aspects of ideal post
- Parallel sided
- Avoids ‘wedging’
- More retentive than tapered
- Non-threaded (Passive)
- Smooth surface incorporates less stress to remaining tooth than threaded (Active) sandblasted, smooth no grooves, no force transmission (causes stress root fracture)
- Cement Retained
- Less retentive than threaded posts but cement acts as buffer between masticatory forces and post/tooth
classification of posts by (3)
- Manufacture
- pre-formed/prefabricated or custom made
- Material
- cast metal, steel, zirconia, carbon/glass fibre
- Shape
- parallel sided or tapered
prefabricated posts
- Only 1 visit required
- No impressions and no fit visit required
- Chairside core build-up
- Immediate preparation of core
- Post and core are different materials
- Large selection of designs and materials