Response to the Depression Flashcards
successful ?
Quite successful in shielding Italy from full impact of worldwide economic downturn
November 1930
Government cut workers’ wages by 12%, encouraged price fixing and cartelisation
Mergers were common, some were compulsory; ensured employment levels stayed stable as fewer businesses were forced to close
public works schemes
Large public work schemes (road building, house construction and electrification of railways) provided employment
government funding for roads doubled 1929-33
5000km of railway electrified
welfare
Welfare increased to ease difficulties of workers who couldn’t find work
banking
government ensured major banks that loaned millions of lire to Italian businesses protected from possible collapse through Instituto Mobiliare Italiano (IMI) policy
provided credit to banks to guarantee they could not collapse
IRI
Instituto di Ricostruzione Industriale (IRI) scheme
government bought up shares in banking, industry and commerce to help prop up Italian economy and ensure these companies did not go bankrupt and collapse
provided education on new management techniques and gave financial and technical assistance to support growth of Italian industries which were now state owned
Once companies were in a healthy state, they sold shares back to private ownership
1939
Government owned majority of companies on steelworks, shipbuilding, electricity, machine tool construction and telephone industries
IRI and IMI
government intervention guaranteed financial support for banks and key employment industries; successful in maintaining public confidence in economy that helped sustain Italy through Great Depression
long term consequences
IRI successful in ensuring bank stability and employment by sustaining failing businesses
public works schemes in roads and hydro-electricity provided jobs
considerable industrial development in 1939 compared to 1922
expenses
1936: Italian state owned larger % of industry than any country except Soviet Union
Budget deficit grew, foreign reserves depleted
Increased welfare spending during depression, spending 6.9% (1930) to 20.6% (1940)
Taxes raised and ‘forced loan’ of 5% on value of housing to be paid
Cartelisation and IRI maintained jobs but restricted innovation and rationalisation of economy kept prices high