Resolving Legal disputes, procedures, alternatives and final conclusions Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What are the seven steps to resolving legal disputes?

A

Step 1 - Issue a letter of claim
Step 2 - Issue claim form
Step 3 - The defendant will either accept or defend the claim
Step 4 - The case is allocated to the relevant track
Step 5 - The interlocutory stage
Step 6 - The trial
Step 7 - Executing the judgement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is a letter of claim and what is it intended to do?

A

Written guidelines off best practice. They are intended to encourage parties to exchange information and settle disputes fairly.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is a Issues claim form?

A

A form which is submitted to the court setting out the details of the claim

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How long does a defendant have to acknowledge a claim and how long do they have to admit/put in a defence?

A

14 days to acknowledge
28 days to admit/put in a defence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the 3 relevant track and what do they include?

A

Small Claims Track - Claims up to £10,000, County Court, simple, no costs claimed from other side
Fast Track Claims - £10,000 - £25,000, timetable set for steps to be taken and to keep costs to a minimum, County Court, Costs are paid by the losing party
Multi Track Claims - Over £25,000, More flexibility, County or High Court, Costs are paid by the losing party

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the Interlocutory stages?

A

Pre-trial stages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What does the trial involve?

A

Each party presents their legal arguments before the court. The judge will decide who wins.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What does executing the judgement include?

A

The losing party is expected to pay the sums due by a date set by the court.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is a Distraint Order?

A

The power to seize company assets

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is a Charging Order?

A

The debt is secured against a home or other property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is Attachment of Earnings?

A

Money is taken directly from wages to pay the debt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is Third Party Debt Order?

A

This freezes money held by a third party and then the money owed is paid directly from the bank to the winning party

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is Insolvency Proceedings?

A

If a debt is £750 or more, the winning party can start insolvency proceedings against the debtor. The company is then wound-up and any debts paid

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are the four types of alternatives to going to court?

A

1) Arbitration
2) Ombudsmen Services
3) Conciliation
4) Medition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is Arbitration?

A

The procedure by which the parties refer their disputes to a third party or parties to be resolved, rather than taking their disputes to court. The parties will agree to be bound by the decision of the arbitrator.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are Commercial Arbitration?

A

This states that in the event of a dispute the parties will refer to arbitration to find a solution

17
Q

What are the advantages of Commercial Arbitration?

A

1) The arbitrator will be an expert and have knowledge of the field in which the dispute arose.
2) Arbitration hearings are private
3) The proceedings are also quicker than court actions
4) The proceedings are less formal than a court case and can be schedules more flexibly
5) Costs are lower

18
Q

What are the disadvantages of Commercial Arbitration?

A

1) Arbitrators do no have the powers of a judge
2) Lack of legal knowledge
3) Works best when the parties are in a position of equal bargaining power

19
Q

What principles does section 1 of the Arbitration act (1996) state that it was founded on?

A

1) The object of arbitrators is to obtain the fair resolution of disputes by an impartial tribunal without necessary delay or expense
2) The parties should be free to agree how their disputes are resolved, subject only to such safeguards as are necessary in the public interest
3) In matter governed by this part of the Act, the court should not intervene

20
Q

What is Ombudsmen Services

A

If the dispute falls into either the legal, banking, insurance or financial services then the ombudsmen service can investigate and resolve problems

21
Q

What is Conciliation

A

Conciliation is where a conciliator will assist the parties to make a decision through exploring all possible solutions for settling the dispute and points out the positives and negatives of the different solutions

22
Q

What is Mediation

A

A mediator is appointed by the parties and acts as a facilitator through which the disputing parties can communicate and negotiate.

23
Q

Who oversees a Tribunal court case?

A

It’s overseen by a Tribunal Judge who is legally qualifies and is assisted by two lay persons who have specialised knowledge in the area of the dispute

24
Q

What do Tribunal hearings cover?

A

Disputes relating to tax, immigration, social security entitlements and employment disputes

25
Q

What are the advantages of Tribunals?

A

Cheaper than going to court
Informal
Quick
Flexible
Specialised knowledge from the persons sitting on the tribunal

26
Q

What are the disadvantages of Tribunals?

A

No access to legal aid
Become more formal over time
Any urgent cases are not resolved quickly enough
Little publicity
May be harder to find the outcome or similar cases

27
Q

What were the 4 key reforms that were made to the civil justice system due to Lord Woolf’s report in 1994?

A

1) The judge now manages the case
2) Pre-Action Protocols were introduced to encourage greater contact between the parties at an early stage
3) To encourage and facilitate the use of alternative dispute resolution
4) The allocation of a dispute to one of the three tracks (small, fast or multi)

28
Q

What are the 4 reasons why it might not be a good idea to bring a civil action?

A

1) Even though you have a strong case it may not be worth suing if the other part does not have the means to pay
2) A company may have gone into liquidation and does not exist anymore
3) Bringing an action can be expensive so a party interested in starting an action may not gain was much as they think
4) The losing party may be liable for the legal fees of the winning party

29
Q

Why are out of court settlements encouraged?

A

Because of court fees, time and effort that it takes

30
Q

What is overruling?

A

Overruling occurs where an appeal court believes that a precedent no linger represents the law

31
Q

What is distinguishing?

A

It allows a court to avoid following a previous decision by declaring the facts before it as significantly different enough for it not to be followed

32
Q

Can judgements be reversed, overruled or distinguished?

A

Yes but only with judgements from lower courts.

33
Q

Why can the doctrine of binding precedents be a good idea?

A

1) It provides certainty to the law
2) It means the law can be flexible
3) It keeps the law on a practical level
4) It can be quicker than waiting for Parliament to legislate
5) It can save litigants money as they can be able to predict an outcome

34
Q

What are the disadvantages of binding precedents?

A

1) The courts can distinguish cases which can lead to some distorted applications
2) The certainty can make the law rigid
3) There is so much case law it can be hard finding the right precedent
4) The law is developed in a haphazard way
5) Judges are not democratically appointed and law-making by judges conflicts with parliamentary sovereignty