Resilience & Prevention Flashcards
Child adversity is mostly conceptualized as
yes/no
ACES
Most common ACEs
Abuse: physical, emotional, sexual
Neglect: physical, emotional
Household dysfunction: mental illness , incarcerated relative, abuse toward parent, substance abuse, divorce
Cumulative risk score
“Lumper” way of measuring ACEs - summing different adversities to represent total # of adversities experienced by an individual. Dominant approach.
CONS: Doesn’t ID risk mechanism, no rationale for choosing/summing adversities, unlikely assumptions
Single adversity approach
“Splitter” way of measuring ACEs - focus on one ACE or examine independent effects of multiple ACEs
PRO: ID pathways
CONS: ignores co-occurrence
Dimensional theoretical approaches
Variation of “splitter”. Group ACEs together based on how they might impact outcome
Example: harshness & unpredictability
DMAP
Dimensional Model of Adversity & Psychopathology
1. Deprivation & threat
2. Deprivation & threat -> psychopathology risk
3. Deprivation & threat -> same outcomes, NOT different
Primary prevention
Universal level
Secondary prevention
Selected level - individuals
Tertiary prevention
Indicated level - already have disorder, prevent further deterioration
Primary prevention / George Albee
Lack-of-provider issue & community psych -> mental health through community as a whole
H. Kraemer types of risk factors for maltreatment
- Fixed markers (won’t change)
- Variable markers (changes by increasing or decreasing)
- Causal risk factors (can change)
Broader risk factors of maltreatment
- Poverty
- Aggregation of risk factors
- Importance of cumulative risk
Costello et al., poverty study
1500 youth ages 9-13, followed 4 years
1/4 Native American
Casino opened - 14% moved out of poverty, fewer psychopathological symptoms
Resilience history
Started out with studies around SCHIZOPHRENIA, pre-morbid competence: knowing who would get disorder. Studied offspring of schizophrenics and observed MULTIFINALITY
What is resilience?
Pattern of positive adaption in the context of significant adversity
(NOT invulnerability and NOT ego-resiliency)