Resilience & Prevention Flashcards

1
Q

Child adversity is mostly conceptualized as

A

yes/no
ACES

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Most common ACEs

A

Abuse: physical, emotional, sexual
Neglect: physical, emotional
Household dysfunction: mental illness , incarcerated relative, abuse toward parent, substance abuse, divorce

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Cumulative risk score

A

“Lumper” way of measuring ACEs - summing different adversities to represent total # of adversities experienced by an individual. Dominant approach.
CONS: Doesn’t ID risk mechanism, no rationale for choosing/summing adversities, unlikely assumptions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Single adversity approach

A

“Splitter” way of measuring ACEs - focus on one ACE or examine independent effects of multiple ACEs
PRO: ID pathways
CONS: ignores co-occurrence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Dimensional theoretical approaches

A

Variation of “splitter”. Group ACEs together based on how they might impact outcome
Example: harshness & unpredictability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

DMAP

A

Dimensional Model of Adversity & Psychopathology
1. Deprivation & threat
2. Deprivation & threat -> psychopathology risk
3. Deprivation & threat -> same outcomes, NOT different

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Primary prevention

A

Universal level

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Secondary prevention

A

Selected level - individuals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Tertiary prevention

A

Indicated level - already have disorder, prevent further deterioration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Primary prevention / George Albee

A

Lack-of-provider issue & community psych -> mental health through community as a whole

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

H. Kraemer types of risk factors for maltreatment

A
  1. Fixed markers (won’t change)
  2. Variable markers (changes by increasing or decreasing)
  3. Causal risk factors (can change)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Broader risk factors of maltreatment

A
  1. Poverty
  2. Aggregation of risk factors
  3. Importance of cumulative risk
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Costello et al., poverty study

A

1500 youth ages 9-13, followed 4 years
1/4 Native American
Casino opened - 14% moved out of poverty, fewer psychopathological symptoms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Resilience history

A

Started out with studies around SCHIZOPHRENIA, pre-morbid competence: knowing who would get disorder. Studied offspring of schizophrenics and observed MULTIFINALITY

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is resilience?

A

Pattern of positive adaption in the context of significant adversity

(NOT invulnerability and NOT ego-resiliency)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

2 judgements of resilience

A
  1. Doing okay in life
    • but what does that mean? Do you need to be HAPPY?
  2. Serious threat to adaptation
    • stressful life events
    • independent? controllable? trauma?
    • what counts?
17
Q

Kauai Study

A

~700 Hawaiian children born in 1955, data collected longitudinally from prenatal to adulthood

Childhood: ~30% classified as “high risk” based on 4 risk factors
1. Pre/perinatal stress
2. Chronic poverty
3. Chronic interparental conflict
4. Parental psychopathology

2/3 of high risk group had problems, but other 1/3 didn’t.

18
Q

Why did 1/3 of high-risk Kauai study not develop issues?

A

Resilience & differed in
1. easy temperament
2. good problem-solving skills
3. positive self-concept
4. social support - mentors!

19
Q

FAST track: Motivation

A

Conduct problems are stable/persistent, high societal cost
Early onset group is @ highest risk
Test developmental theories

20
Q

FAST track design

A

Early, comprehensive, long-lasting
4 sites, 56 schools
Randomized to interventions vs control by school
High-risk, screening process
- Top 10% on aggression in kindergarten

21
Q

FAST TRACK Universal intervention for youth example

A

Classroom-based: PATHS - Promoting Alternative Thinking Strategies

22
Q

FAST TRACK indicated intervention for high-risk youth examples:

A
  1. Parenting groups
  2. Child social-skill groups
  3. Mentoring
  4. Academic tutoring
  5. Home visits
  6. Peer pairing
23
Q

FAST track outcome data

A

Modest reductions in conduct disorder diagnosis
Positive effects on parenting, social competence, and early behavior problems

24
Q

FAST track stands for what?

A

Families and schools together