Research paper 2 Flashcards
Title?
Identification of FOXN4 as a tumor suppressor of breast carcinogenesis via the activation of TP53 and deactivation of Notch Signaling
What is FOX?
- fork head domain-containing superfamily proteins
- transcription factor… regulating expression of genes involved in cell growth, proliferation, differentiation, longevity.
- defining feature is the forkhead box, a sequence of amino acids that binds DNA
Why is Fox studied?
- Fox has been found to play a role in biological processes such as carinogenesis…
- dysfunction of Fox = disorder
Why FOXN4?
- member of the Fox protein family..
- least studied
- primary function is shown to be involved in determining cell fate in retinal progenitor cells through the use of notch signaling
Progenitor cells
- A progenitor cell is a biological cell that can differentiate into a specific cell type
Whats the difference between a progenitor cell and a stem cell?
Activation of notch signaling
Notch signaling occurs when membrane-bound ligands such as Dll1 and Dll4 on one cell activate Notch receptors on neighboring cells (Figure 1A, trans-activation) (Artavanis-Tsakonas et al., 1999; Nichols et al., 2007b; Bray, 2016). However, other types of interactions are also known to occur.
Notch signaling
Notch signaling is an evolutionarily conserved pathway in multicellular organisms that regulates cell-fate determination during development and maintains adult tissue homeostasis (control of proliferation, death, and tissue renewal).
Describe figure 1A
- Q: What are the abundance lvls of FOXN4 mRNA in N adjacent vs Tumor tissue?
- Researchers used qPCR (quantify number of nucleic acids) in order to determine the abundance of mRNA.
- They found that NT had a significantly higher amount of FOXN4 mRNA in comparison to tumor tissue
- conclusion:
Describe figure 1B
- Q: What are the levels of FOXN4 mRNA in high risk vs low risk breast cancer patients?
- Q: Why low vs high risk?:
- Researchers used breast cancer data from the ATCG database to compare levels of FOXN4 mRNA in low risk vs high risk breast cancer patients.
- Found significantly lower FOXN4 mRNA was associated with higher risk of breast cancer
- conclusion: Low levels of FOXN4 is associated with a higher risk of breast cancer.
Describe figure 1C
Describe figure 1D
Q: Is there a significant difference in FOXN4 mRNA levels in cell lines from normal tissue vs tumor tissue?
- qPCR to measure mRNA levels in normal cell lines vs breast cancer cell lines
- found lower levels of FOXN4 mRNA in tumor cell lines vs normal cell lines
- found lower levels of FOXN4 mRNA in metastatic cell lines than non-metastatic cell line
- C: FOXN4 levels in breast cancer cell lines are significantly lower than FOXN4 mRNA in normal cell lines.
FOXN4 levels in metastatic breast cancer cell lines are significantly lower than non-metastatic cell lines
Describe figure 2A
- Q: What are the levels of FOXN4 mRNA in NM cell line MCF-7 vs M cell line T74D when FOXN4 is overexpressed or silenced?
- In order to further explore the role of FOXN4 on breast cancer cells by gain and loss of function analysis, the researchers first silenced and overexpressed FOXN4 mRNA in cell lines MCF-7 and T74D. why? to use the overexpressed and silenced samples to explore differences in viability and colony formation.
Silencing: shRNA molecules are processed within the cell to form siRNA which in turn knock down gene expression. The benefit of shRNA is that they can be incorporated into plasmid vectors and integrated into genomic DNA for longer-term or stable expression, and thus longer knockdown of the target mRNA.
Overexpression: clone it into an expression construct and transfect and retain the plasmid in the cell using a selectable marker. - found suppression and overexpression of FOXN4 mRNA in both cell lines
Describe figure 2B
- Q: How does gene silencing and overexpression in non-metastatic MCF-7 effect cell viabiliy? (# of live, healthy cells)
- Used MTT assay, a colorimetric assay for assessing cell metabolic activity
- found: silencing of FON4 had an increase in cell viability, overexpression of FOXN4 led to a decrease in cell viability
- conclusion: Silencing FOXN4 promotes tumor cell viability, overexpression of FOXN4 inhibits tumor cell viability’