research methods pt2 Flashcards
what does validity mean?
the main idea of, does a test measure what it claims to be measuring
what is internal validity?
- refers to the extent in which a study’s results can be attributed to the independent variable and not the extraneous variables
what is an example of internal validity?
- investigating views on teachers through a questionnaire, to make it internally valid the questions have to be directly about teachers and not ‘should we have a 4 day week’.
what is external validity?
- the extent to which the findings of a study can be generalised to other populations, settings and overtime
what is an example of external validity?
- assessing a new medication but outside of the experimental setting
what is a setting also known as?
- ecological validity
what is ‘overtime’ also referred as?
- temporal validity
what is reliability?
- the consistency of measurements and if we get the same results repeatedly, to see if we can actually trust a researchers findings
what is internal reliability?
- a test that is consistent within itself that needs the same criteria to gain accurate results
what is external reliability?
- if a test is consistent overtime e.g. if previous methods have worked the same with different people or location
what is a lab experiment?
- an experiment that is conducted in highly controlled environments, however not always in a lab
what are the strengths of a lab experiment?
- high control over confounding variables and extraneous variables, so only the IV affects the DV
- high internal validity
- replication is more likely due to control- this ensures findings are valid and reliable
what are the weaknesses of a lab experiment?
- lacks generalisability as environment is artificial
- lacks external validity as it is an unfamiliar environment so people may act differently
- demand characteristics are more likely as participants know they are being studied
- low mundane realism as the environment is artificial
what is meant by mundane realism?
the extent to which a study matches the real world situation, to which it’s results will be applied
what is a field experiment?
- the IV is manipulated in a natural, more everyday setting
- the researcher goes to the participants usual environment rather than a lab
what are the strengths of a field experiment?
- higher mundane realism due to a more natural environment therefore behaviour is more valid and authentic
- high external validity as participants do not know they are being studied
what are the weaknesses of a field experiment?
- loss of control over control variables and extraneous variables, causing affect between the IV and DV
- ethical issues rise due to consent and invasion of privacy
what is a natural experiment?
- an experiment where there is no control over the IV and cannot change it e.g. a natural disaster
- this experiment would occur whether or not the experimenter was there
what are the strengths of a natural experiment?
- provides the opportunity to research a field that is difficult to study for practical or ethical issues
- high external validity due to relating real world issues
what are the weaknesses of a natural experiments?
- a naturally occurring event may only happen rarely which can make it hard to generalise
- participants cannot be randomly allocated which means the cause of effect between the IV and DV becomes unclear
- if tested in a lab, demand characteristics and realism can become an issue
what is a Quasi experiment?
this experiment has an IV that is based on an existing difference between people ( e.g. gender/age ) so no one manipulates the IV: it simply exists and the experimenter cannot randomly allocate the participants to conditions
what are the strengths of a quasi experiment?
- often carried out in controlled settings so has a high validity
what are the weaknesses of a quasi experiment?
- cannot randomly allocate participants so there may be control variables
- the experimenter has not deliberately changed the IV so cannot claim the IV has caused change
what is sampling?
sampling is a technique used to select participants to take part in their investigation