Research Methods Flashcards
define experimental method
the manipulation of an IV to measure its effect on the DV
define aim
general statement of what the researcher intends to investigate
define hypothesis
a clear, precise, testable statement that states the relationship between the variables being investigated
define directional hypothesis
states the direction of difference or relationship
define non-directional hypothesis
does not state direction
define variables
anything that can vary or change within an investigation
define IV
some aspect of the experimental situation that is manipulated by the researcher so that an effect on the DV can be measured
define DV
variable that is measured by the researcher
define operationalisation
clearly defining variables in terms of how they can be measured
define EV
variable, other than the IV, that may have an effect on the DV - do not vary systematically with the IV
define CV
variable, other than the IV, that may have an effect on the DV - does vary systematically with the IV
define demand characteristics
any cue from the researcher or research situation that may be interpreted by cps as revealing the purpose of the investigation - may lead to a change in B
define investigator effects
any effect of the investigator’s B on the research outcome - may include selection and interaction with pps
define randomisation
use of chance in order to control effects of bias when designing materials and deciding order of condition
define standardisation
using exactly same formalised procedures and instructions for pps
what is an independent groups design
pps allocated to diff groups where each group experiences a diff experimental condition
what is a repeated measures design
all pps experience all conditions within an experiment
what is a matched pairs design
pairs of pps are matched on some variable that may affect the DV, then one member is allocated to condition A and the other condition B
define random allocation
attempt to control pp variables in an independent groups design which ensures each pp has the same chance of being in one condition as any other
define counterbalancing
attempt to control order effects in repeated measures design; half pps experience conditions in one order, and other half in opposite order
give two limitations of independent groups design
- pps who occupy each group are not the same (effects on DV may be due to pp variables, not IV)
- less economical than repeated measures as each pp only produces one result
give two strengths of independent groups design
- no order effects
- pps less likely to get bored
give two limitations of repeated measures design
- order effects (cause boredom, deterioration in performance)
- pps more likely to work out aim of study
give two strengths of repeated measures design
- pp variables are controlled
- more economical that independent groups design (less pps needed)
give two limitations of matched pairs design
- time-consuming
- expensive
give two strengths of matched pairs design
- order effects and DC less of a problem
- fewer pp variables
define lab experiment
an experiment that takes place in a controlled environment within which that researcher manipulates the IV and records the effect on the DV, whilst maintaining a strict control over EVs
define field experiment
an experiment that takes place in a natural setting within which the researcher manipulates the IV and records the effect on the DV
define quasi experiment
a study in which the IV is not determined by anyone, it simply exists (e.g. being old and young)
define natural experiment
an experiment where the change in the IV is not brought about by the researcher but instead occurs naturally
give two strengths of lab experiments
- high internal validity
- easily replicable
give two limitations of lab experiments
- may lack generalisability
- DC can arise
give two strengths of field experiments
- high mundane realism
- high external validity
give two limitations of field experiments
- low control over EVs
- ethical issues with consent
give two strengths of natural experiments
- provide opportunities for study in areas that may be considered ethically wrong (e.g. Romanian orphans)
- high external validity
give two limitations of field experiments
- limited generalisability (v. rare)
- issues related to random allocation
give two strengths of quasi experiments
- high control
- high internal validity
give two limitations of quasi experiments
- cannot randomly allocate pps
- may be CVs
define population
group of people who are the focus of the researcher’s interest, from which a smaller sample is drawn
define sample
group of people drawn from a target population who take part in research
define sampling techniques
method of selecting pps for a study
define bias in relation to sampling
when certain groups may be over or under represented within the sample
define generalisation
the extent to which findings and conclusions from a particular study can be broadly applied to the population
define target population
a subset of the general population
define random sampling
all members from target population have an equal chance of being selected
how would you do a random sample
random number generator
define systematic sampling
when every nth person from the target population is selected
how would you do a systematic sample
create a list organised in alphabetical ordering select a system (e.g. every 3rd, 7th or 10th person is selected)
define stratified sampling
composition of the sample reflects the proportions of people in certain strata in the target/ wider population
how would you do a stratified sample
identify different strata that make up population and calculate the proportions needed
define opportunity sampling
where researcher selects anyone willing and available at the time
define volunteer sampling
pps select themselves to be part of the sample
how would you do a volunteer sample
place an advert in a newspaper
give two strengths of random sampling
- free from researcher bias
- theoretically representative
give two limitations of random sampling
- list of population can be difficult to obtain
- time consuming process
give two strengths of systematic sampling
- avoids researcher bias
- fairly representative
give two limitations of systematic sampling
- risk of data manipulation
- less random than random sampling
give two strengths of stratified sampling
- avoids researcher bias
- highly representative sample
give two limitations of stratified sampling
- time consuming
- identified strata don’t reflect ways in which individuals within them are different
give two strengths of opportunity sampling
- convenient
- cheap
give two limitations of opportunity sampling
- chance of researcher bias
- sample may be unrepresentative (area taken from can be reflected by people)
give two strengths of volunteer sampling
- requires minimal input from researcher
- saves time
give two limitations of volunteer sampling
- volunteer bias (attracts certain kind of person)
- limited generalisability
define informed consent
making pps aware of study aims, procedures and right to withdraw
give a limitation of informed consent
- B may not be natural
define deception
deliberately misleading or withholding info from pps
define protection from harm
not placing pps in danger of physical or psychological damage
define privacy and confidentiality
pps have right to control info about themselves and withdraw at any point
define ethics
arise when conflict exists between the rights of pps and goals of research to produce valid data
define pilot study
small-scale version of an investigation that takes place before the real thing to check procedures, materials and measuring scales work and allow the researcher to make changes if necessary
define single-blind
attempt to control DC where pps are unaware of research aims
define double-blind
attempt to control DC and researcher bias where pps and individual carrying out investigation are unaware of the research aims