Research Methods Flashcards
Aims
Developed from theories, general statements that describe the purpose of an investigation
Hypothesis
Clear testable statement that states the relationship between the variables and predict the outcome of a study before it starts
Directional hypothesis
Identifies direction of difference between two conditions
Directional
Non-directional hypothesis
States a difference between conditions but the nature of the difference is not made clear
Used when there is no prior evidence or results are contradictory
Non-directional
IV
Independent variable, variable that experimenter manipulates, or naturally changes so effect on DV can be measured
DV
Dependent variable, variable measured against the IV
Operationalisation
Variables being manipulated should be clearly defined and measurable
Extraneous variables
Variables that do not vary systematically with the IV, can often be controlled before experiment starts
Confounding variable
Variables that do vary systematically with IV, can’t be sure what is effecting DV
Essentially extraneous variables the experimenter failed to control for
Demand characteristics
Participants interpret cues from the experimenter (investigator effects) and research situation. They may change their behaviour as a result
Randomisation
The use of chance to reduce researcher’s influence on the design of the investigation
Standardisation
Making sure all ppts are subject to the same standardised instructions and experience
Random allocation
Attempt to evenly distribute ppt difference across experimental conditions in independent group designes
Counterbalancing
Attempt to control for order effects in repeated measures experiment, half the group experiences conditions in one order, and the other half in the opposite order
Experimental design
The different ways in which the testing of ppts can be organised in relation to the experimental conditions
Experiment
Where a change in IV effects the DV and results are measured/recorded
Types of experiment
Lab experiments
+ve and -ve
Takes place within controlled environment, researcher manipulates IV and records effect on DV. High control of extraneous variables
+ve High contol means study can be replicated without introducing more extraneous variables
-ve Low mundane realism, tasks carried out by ppts in lab exp may not represent real life
Types of experiment
Field experiments
+ve and -ve
Takes place in natural setting, researcher manipulates IV and records effect on DV
+ve Higher mundane realism than lab exp
-ve Ethical issue, ppts aware not be away they are being studied, no informed concent + invasion of privacy
Types of experiment
Natural experiments
+ve and -ve
IV changes without researcher’s influence, DV is simply recorded
+ve High external validity, involves study of real life issues as they happen - eg natural disaster on stress levels
-ve The situation may be rare in occurrence, limits ability to generalise results to other situations
Types of experiment
Quasi experiments
+ve and -ve
Iv is not manipulated but is based on existing differences between ppts, such as age
+ve Carried out under controlled conditions similar to lab exp
-ve Random allocation is not possible, may be confounding variables
Random sample
+ve and -ve
Every member of the target population has an equal chance of being selected.
+ve free from researcher bias, researcher has no influence over who is selected, prevents them picking those who would support hypothesis
-ve more likely to produce sample that is not representative, Eg 20 females from ldn and 1 boy
Systematic sample
+ve
Every nth person is chosen from a list.
+ve Avoids researcher bias
+ve Provides representative data
Stratified sample
+ve and -ve
The proportions of people in population sub-groups (strata) are reflected in the sample.
+ve Made to accurately reflect groups within population, highly representative sample makes generalising results possible
-ve odentified strata can not reflect all the ways people are different, cant be perfectly representative
Opportunity sample
+ve and -ve
Whoever is available at the time of sampling will be included.
+ve Convenient as saves researcher time and effort less costly than random sampling eg
- ve Results cant be generalised to whole pop as sample is drawn from one place eg street
- ve Researcher has control over selection of participants, researcher bias as they wont select people they dont like the look of
Volunteer sample
+ve and -ve
Ppts self select through an ad eg
+ve Easy to obtain sample, minimal effort required from researcher, time efficient
-ve Volunteer bias is a problem - may attract certain type of people eg helpful, curious. Restricts how far results can be generalised
Define ethical issue
When a conflict arises between the rights and dignity of a ppt and the needs of the researcher to produce valid/worthwile data beneficial to society
Ethical issue + solution
Informed consent
Ppts should be made aware of the aims, procedures and their right to withdraw before agreeing to take part
If informed consent cant be obtained:
- get prior general, retrospective or presumptive consent
Presumptive consent
Similar group to research group is asked for consent, if they agree, research group’s consent is presumed
Prior general consent
Ppts are shown a list of studies to consent to, one which involves deception, by agreeing they are essentially agreeing to be deceived
Retrospective consent
Ppts are asked for consent during debriefing, once they have already taken part in study
Ethical issue + solution
Deception
Ppts should not deliberately be misled, some deception is acceptable
-full debrief is required at the end
Ethical issue + solution
Confidentiality
Participants’ anonymity and privacy must be respected
-names should not be recorded
Ethical issue + solution
Protection form harm
Participants should not be exposed to any more risk than they would be in everyday life.
-participants should be offered counselling as part of the debrief
Pilot study
Small scale version of the experiment/questionnaire/observation and will usually involve a small sample size
Allows researcher to identify issues in exp design, saving them time and money in large scale study
Single blind preocedure
Ppts are not made aware some of the details of the investigation, like what condition they are in to reduce demand characteristics
Attempts to control confounding effects of demand characteristics
Double blind procedure
The ppt nor the person conducting the study is made aware of the aim, to reduce demand characteristics + investigator effects
Controlled observation
+ve and -ve
Watching and recording behaviour within a structured environment, some variables are manipulated
+ve Extraneous variables become less of a factor, replication of study becomes more possible
-ve Findings may not apply to everyday life, not generalisable to daily life
Covert Observation
+ve and -ve
Covert: behaviour observed without awareness/consent of ppt
+ve Low ppt reactivity, less chance of demand characteristics
-ve Ethically questionable as no consent for observation has been given