Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Research Methods & Stats for Psychology > Research Methods > Flashcards

Research Methods Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
Psychology 101 flashcards GRE® Psychology flashcards AP® Psychology flashcards
1
Q

Between groups design

A

Using separate groups of participants for each of the different conditions in the experiment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Within subjects design

A

Each participant is exposed to all the conditions of the experiment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Ratio data

A

Data is measured in units on a constant scale, with an absolute zero value.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Interval data

A

Data is measured in units on a constant scale, with equal intervals. No “zero” value.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Nominal data

A

When data is categorised based on an equivalent feature (i.e. name, gender, number).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Ordinal data

A

Ordered by rank e.g. 1st, 2nd, 3rd.

N.B. Tells us nothing about differences between values.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Level of measurement

A

Relationship between what is being measured and numbers obtained on a scale (i.e. accuracy of measurement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Empirical

A

Gathering evidence through observation and measurement that can be replicated.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Measurement error

A

A discrepancy between the number we use to represent the thing we are measuring and the actual value.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What a score consists of:

A

1) True score
2) A score for other things we are inadvertently measuring
3) Systematic bias
4) Random error

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Discrete variable

A

No underlying continuum. No overlapping categories. Clear beginning and end.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Continuous variable

A

A continuum with no clear beginning or end.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Does correlation imply causality?

A

1) Tertium quid - a third measurable factor of intermediate value.
2) Direction of causality - A = B but not vice versa.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Inductive reasoning

A

Reasoning based on probable premises.

Premise 1: I like dogs
Premise 2: I like cute animals

Conclusion: Dogs are cute.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Mill’s criteria for causality

A

An improvement on Hume’s:

1) Cause must precede effect.
2) Cause and effect should correlate.
3) All other explanations of cause-effect relationship rules out.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Hypothesis bias

A

People have a natural bias to confirm hypotheses rather than reject them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Control condition

A

Condition in which cause is absent. Acts as a baseline for comparison.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Independent variable

A

The variable that is manipulated.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Dependent variable

A

The variable that is measured as a result (a.k.a. Outcome variable).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

How to remove tertium quid

A

1) Control other factors.

2) Randomisation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Importance of randomisation

A

Avoid systemic bias - to ensure an equivalent spread of attributes across groups.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

How to increase confidence

A

1) Significance (e.g. p<0.05).
2) Randomisation.
3) Replication.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Correlational study

A

Naturally occurring phenomenon without interference.

Weakness = not causal.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Experimental study

A

Environment is manipulated in some way.

Weakness = not natural.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Why do we prefer parametric tests?

A

1) There is a greater variety of parametric tests so can analyse a greater variety of situations.
2) Generally better at finding experimental effects.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Self-report considerations

A

1) Content validity
2) Criterion validity
3) Factorial validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Content validity

A

All the facets of the construct are being represented in the test.

Are all aspects of the topic assessed by the test / scale?

28
Q

Criterion validity

A

The extent to which a measure is related to an outcome

E.g if a candidate does a test for a job interview - how valid is it as a predictor of performance in the job

29
Q

Factorial validity

A

If one factor of the questionnaire meaningfully implies that the other factor is true and they go together.

30
Q

Types of scale

A

1) Yes / no
2) Likert (e.g. PHQ-9)
3) Visual analog (e.g. |———x—| )

31
Q

Measurement error

A

Difference in scores on measurement scale and level of construct we’re measuring.

32
Q

Cronbach’s alpha

A

Splitting data in half and computing the correlation for each split to measure reliability of correlation.

N.B. Must be > 0.8 to indicate reliability.

33
Q

Threats to internal validity

A

1) Group threats - selection process
2) Regression to mean - natural reduction to the average after initial extreme
3) Time threats - events occurring over time
4) History - unrelated events
5) Motivation - human nature
6) Instrument change - inc. calibration of equipment
7) Differential mortality - dropout effect
8) Reactivity - by measuring behaviour, it may change

34
Q

Threats to external validity

A

1) Extraneous variables - other things that might influence result.
2) Over-use of sample groups (i.e. students, volunteers, etc.).
3) Restricted number of participants.

35
Q

Quasi-experimental design

A

Patients allocate themselves / are allocated to the group based on pre-assessment behaviour.

Pros: ethical reasons.
Cons: other predisposing variables.

36
Q

Advantages of between groups design

A

1) Simplicity.
2) Less chance of practice effects.
3) Sometimes hard for an individual to participate in all conditions (e.g. gender studies).

37
Q

Disadvantages of between groups design

A

1) Expensive - time, effort, resources.
2) Less likely to detect effect of variables.
3) More confounding variables a.k.a. noise.
4) More individual differences.

38
Q

Advantages of repeated measures design

A

1) Economy (inexpensive)

2) Sensitivity - more likely to measure what is required, reduces “noise”, and eliminates other factors.

39
Q

Disadvantages of repeated measures design

A

1) Carry over effects from one condition to another - order effects.
2) Need for conditions to be reversible (i.e. can’t jump off a cliff in one condition).

40
Q

How to eliminate order effects

A

1) Randomise order of conditions.

2) Counter balance order of conditions - one group does A-B and another does B-A.

41
Q

Latin squares design

A

The order of conditions is counterbalanced so each possible order of conditions occurs once.

A  B  C  D  E 
B  C  D  E  A 
C  D  E  A  B 
D  E  A  B  C
E  A  B  C  D
42
Q

Multifactorial design

A

More than one independent variable.

e.g. age & gender effects

43
Q

Mixed design

A

Where some of the independent variables are between groups and some are repeated measures.

44
Q

Single subject design

A

A study to measure the behaviour of just one or a few people, to draw inferences from the findings.

45
Q

Systematic variation

A

Due to the experimental manipulation in the design of the study (e.g. if participants weren’t randomised).

46
Q

Randomised variation

A

Due to the natural existence of differences between people as uncontrolled factors.

47
Q

ABA design

A

Baseline state is measured (state A), followed by treatment applied and behaviour is measured (state B), then treatment is removed after and baseline is measured (state A).

Treatment effects disappear / decrease when withdrawn and reappear when treatment is established.

48
Q

Multiple baseline design

A

ABA on several participants.

If manipulation is irreversible or reversal is undesirable (e.g. can’t reignite depression), you can use AB design on a few participants instead of ABA. Each participant experiences their transition at a different time, meaning the manipulated change causes the effect rather than just variance.

AAAAABBB
AAABBBBB

49
Q

Ethical considerations

A

1) Influence of experimenters.
2) Informed consent is a must.
3) Observational studies - OK if in public view. No spying!
4) Aim to debrief.
5) Deception has to be NECESSARY if used.
6) Participants have the right to confidentiality.
7) Protection from physical and psychological harm.

50
Q

Structured interview

A

Quantitive research method commonly used in surveys.

51
Q

Unstructured interview

A

Guidance to what is being researched but no prearranged questions, like in a radio interview. More of a qualitative research method.

52
Q

Directional observation

A

Influencing the environment (e.g. in a lab) but observing natural behaviour.

53
Q

Hypothesis (H1)

A

A proposed explanation based upon existing limited evidence as a starting point for investigation.

54
Q

Null hypothesis (H0)

A

A default position where there is no relationship between two measured phenomena.

Remember: we cannot prove a hypothesis but we can reject a null hypothesis.

55
Q

Directional (one-tailed) hypothesis

A

There will be a direct effect between two variables in one predicted direction.

56
Q

Non-directional (two-tailed) hypothesis

A

There will be an effect between two variables but with no given direction.

57
Q

Correlational study

A

A study to determine a relationship between 2 variables.

58
Q

Face validity

A

1) Is it obvious what the test is measuring.

2) Does the test appear to assess the intended psychological construct.

59
Q

Construct validity

A

The extent to which a test measures what it is claiming to measure

60
Q

Cross-sectional design

A

A study to observe an effect at one given point in time.

61
Q

Longitudinal study

A

A study to observe an effect over an extended period of time.

62
Q

Effectiveness of an intervention

A

Is the intervention valid in a real world setting where other variables cannot be controlled

63
Q

Efficacy

A

How an intervention performs in a controlled idealised setting

64
Q

Ecological validity

A

Does it reflect real life

65
Q

Extraneous variable

A

An extra variable usually unaccounted for

66
Q

Predictor variable

A

Independent variable

Research Methods & Stats for Psychology (2 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions