Research Methods Flashcards
A hypothesis is a p________ and t_______ statement of the relationship between two variables.
Prediction and testable statement
Directional (or one-tailed) hypothesis=
A direct and specific effect between dependent and independent variables (e.g how one increases the other or decreases)
Non-directional (or two-tailed) hypothesis=
No specific effect, only that one impacts the other (e.g. Diet affects health)
When is an alternative hypothesis written?
When you are using a non-experimental method (e.g. An observation or a survey)
What is operationalisation?
Putting variables into a form that can be easily tested, so defining them AS PRECISELY AS POSSIBLE.
How might you operationalise variables so to operationalise the hypothesis?
Original hypothesis= people work better rather than noisy conditions.
Variables:
IV= quiet vs. noisy environment DV= work better
Operationalised hypothesis= people will obtain a higher score on a memory test when tested in quiet (no sound) rather than noisy (radio playing) conditions.
Variables:
IV= (quiet) No sound IV= (noisy) Radio playing
DV= (work better) Obtain a higher score on a memory test.
What are the features of a laboratory study?
- variables are carefully controlled
- participants are aware that they are taking part in the study
- participants may not know the (true) aim(s) of the study
Examples of a lab study-
Milgram- obedience to unjust authority
Skinner- positive and negative reinforcement
Bandura- Bobo Doll experiment
Pavlov- salivary reflex in dogs
Schemas study (highly controlled environment)
Advantages of lab study-
- High degree of control minimises extraneous variables
- High degree of control leads to higher internal validity
- High degree of control= greater likelihood of establishing cause- effect relationship
- High degree of control + careful design= greater potential for replicability
Disadvantages of lab study-
- High degree of control may lead to lack of ecological validity
- High degree of control gives an increased risk of demand characteristics
- High degree of control gives an increased risk of experimenter effects
What are the features of a field study?
- experimental investigations carried out in NATURAL SETTING (e.g. homes, schools)
- involves direct control of IV + allocation of participants to groups
Examples of a field study-
- Hofling et al- obedience in a hospital setting (from nurses who were asked to administer a drug they’d never heard of)
- “What would you do?” experiments
Advantages of field study-
- Improved ecological validity (because behaviour studied is more realistic)
- Decreased risk of demand characteristics
Disadvantages of field study-
- Less control over extraneous variables
- Reduced internal validity
- Potentially more time consuming
- Potentially more expensive
- More difficult to replicate study
What are the features of a natural experiment-
- Makes use of NATURALLY OCCURRING DIFFERENCES (e.g. People who smoke and people who don’t) but could still be changed (unlike quasi)
- Researcher cannot control IV
- Researcher cannot allocate participants to conditions
What are the features of a Quasi experiment?
- IV is naturally occurring
- IV cannot be made to vary by anyone (e.g. gender differences)
- DV may be measured in a lab
Advantages of Natural and Quasi-
- Reduces demand characteristics
- Allows for comparisons between different types of people
Disadvantages of Natural and Quasi-
- Difficult to make causal conclusions (e.g. smokers may go to the gym less but not because they smoke)
- No control over extraneous variables causing the result
What is an ethical issue?
The science of moral principles or rules of behaviour with the potential of causing psychological or physical harm.
What is the BPS Code of Ethics?
It promotes ethical behaviour among psychologists by showing clear ethical principles to protect the public from harm.
The four key principles are
1) respect
2) competence
3) responsibility
4) integrity
Name the five main ethical issues.
1) Deception
2) Informed consent
3) Protection of participants
4) The right to withdraw
5) Confidentiality and anonymity
Dece(nt) with pro(fessional) con-con
How might you deal with the ethical issue DECEPTION?
- Avoidance from withholding information or deceiving participants about the nature of purpose of investigation. (However it may be necessary to deceive participants in some cases e.g. If it will cause participant effects)
- Debriefing session: making sure that participant leaves the study in the same state that they entered (however is de-briefing sufficient?)
- Any deception should be approved by an ETHICS COMMITTEE (however cost- benefit decisions can be prone to subjective judgements)
How might you deal with the ethical issue INFORMED CONSENT?
- Participants should agree to participate
- Participants should be aware of the nature and purpose of the experiment
- Special care should be taken with children or vulnerable adults as participants (however to what extent do psychologists say that a study is safe for children and vulnerable adults?)
- prior general consent or presumptive consent obtained. (However these could be very inaccurate and cause major problems)
PRIOR GENERAL CONSENT= obtaining prior consent from participant to see whether they’d be happy taking part in a study involving deception. If they agree, it would be okay to include them in future research involving deception.
PRESUMPTIVE CONSENT= taking random sample of population and introducing them to research involving deception. If they would be happy to take part, we can generalise from this to the wider population.
How might you deal with the ethical issue PROTECTION?
Risk of harm:
- lack of deception so participants are aware of potential harm
- responsibility from researchers to protect participants
Risk of stress:
- Right to withdraw
- Debriefing session
Animals:
- No unnecessary harm as many people argue that animals have emotions
How might you deal with the ethical issue of THE RIGHT TO WITHDRAW?
- Participants should be aware of the fact that they can withdraw at any time.
- there should be no temptations to stay (often participants are paid or rewarded for their participation which may mean that they feel obligated to continue with the study)
How might you deal with the ethical issue CONFIDENTIALITY AND ANONYMITY?
- Participant names not recorded
- No obvious links in data to specific individuals
- warning to individuals if anonymity/ confidentiality cannot be guaranteed