research methods Flashcards

(55 cards)

1
Q

self report

A

first hand record from participant, excellent source of data not necessarily accurate.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

observation

A

look at that is happening and record it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

experiments

A

to see if one factor causes a difference in behaviour.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

correlation

A

looking at differences between groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

opportunity sampling

A

selecting people who are most easily available at the time, easiest, inevitably biased.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

random sampling

A

using a random technique so everyone has an equal chance, unbiased, takes more time and effort.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

self selected sampling

A

asking for volunteers, convenient way to find willing participants, less likely to drop out, same characteristics that make them volunteer.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

snowball sampling

A

referrals form initial participants to generate additional participants, locates a large group who are difficult to access, not a good cross-section of population.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

generalisability

A

to be able to draw conclusions about people form the research they conduct with a small sample.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

anonymity and confidentiality

A

participants right to have personal information protected.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

deception

A

when a participant is not told the true aims of a study.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

informed consent

A

participants are given a comprehensive information concerning the nature and purpose of a study and their role in it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

privacy

A

refers to a person’s right to control the flow of information about themselves.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

right to withdraw

A

participants should be told that they can stop participating in a study if they are uncomfortable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

protection from harm

A

participants shouldn’t suffer negative physical or psychological effects.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

questionnaire

A

easily repeated, more willing to reveal personal info, group involved may be biased.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

open question

A

provide own answers provides qualitative data, rich details, difficult to detect patterns.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

structured interview

A

predetermined questions delivered by an interviewer who doesn’t probe, can be easily repeated, easier to analyse, expectations may influence answers.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

closed question

A

easily repeated, more willing to reveal personal info, group involved may be biased.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

semi-structured interview

A

some questions predetermined new questions as interview proceeds, more detailed info, access info that may not be revealed otherwise, interviewer bias, leading questions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

rating scale

A

Likert (agree/disagree), semantic differential (attitude), reasonably objective, quantitative data, ‘middle of the road’.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

internal reliability

A

whether a questionnaire is consistent within itself.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

unstructured interview

A

no questions decided in advance, same as above.

19
Q

inter-rater reliability

A

the consistency between two different interviewers.

19
external reliability
measure of whether something varies from one time to another.
19
external validity
the extent to which results can be generalised beyond the study.
20
population validity
the extent to which the results of a study can be generalised to other groups of people besides the participants who took part in the study.
21
face validity
whether the item on a test look like they are assessing what the researcher intended to assess.
21
internal validity
concerns whether a test does assess what it intended to assess.
22
ecological validity
ability to generalise a research effect beyond the setting in which it is demonstrated to other settings, for a questionnaire whether responses to questions represent target behaviour.
23
researcher bias
interviewer’s expectations or beliefs may be unconsciously communicated to participants which affects the answers give.
24
construct validity
whether a test assesses the underlying concept of construct.
25
concurrent validity
can be established by comparing performance on a new test with a previously validated test on the same topic.
26
criterion validity
the extent that test scores can predict a future behaviour or attitude.
27
event sampling
list of behavioural categories then count every time each of the behaviours occurs in a specified time period, increases validity, may miss multiple things happening at once reducing validity.
28
unstructured observation
observer records all relevant behaviour but has no system, useful when behaviour is unpredicted, used in pilot studies, behaviours recorded are usually the most eye-catching.
29
controlled observation
some variables are changed by the researcher, focus on aspects of behaviour, may feel unnatural, may lack validity.
29
time sampling
recording behaviours at regular intervals or taking a sample at different times of the day or month, allows for tracking of time-related changes in behaviour, may decrease validity because some behaviours will inevitably be missed.
29
structured observation
system is used to restrict and organise collection of info, improves inter-rater reliability, may ‘see’ or ‘hear’ what they expect to see.
29
naturalistic observation
nothing changed, realistic, little control of variables.
30
null hypothesis
a statement of no difference.
30
participant observation
participant, likely to provide special insight, closer detail, objectivity reduced, more difficult to record and monitor unobtrusively.
30
non-participant observation
not a participant, increased objectivity, may misinterpret communications within the group.
30
one tailed hypothesis
states the direction of the difference in the hypothesis.
30
alternate hypothesis
a statement about the relationship between variables.
30
two tailed hypothesis
states there is a difference.
31
covert observation
without a participant’s knowledge, behave more naturally, raises ethical issues (deception and invasion of privacy).
31
overt observation
aware of being observed, avoids lack of informed consent, observer effect.
32
repeated measures design
each participant takes part in every condition, good control of participant variables, fewer participants needed, order effects, may guess purpose of experiments.
33
independent measures design
participants are allocated to two experimental groups, avoids order effects, avoids guessing of purpose, no control of participant variables, needs more participants.
33
matched partners design
participants similar on key variables are paired each doing a different condition, acts as a control, avoids order effects, time consuming, may not control all participant variables.
34
demand characteristics
cues in an experimental design communicate to participants what is expected of them and may unconsciously affect their behaviour.
35
participant variable
characteristic of the participant.
36
extraneous variables
any variable other that the independent variable that might potentially affect the dependant variable and thereby confound the results.
37
situational variable
feature of the environment that may affect performance