Research methods Flashcards
Questionnaires
Main method for gathering data in social surveys
list of questions handed or posted to respondent for delf-completion
Questionnaire design (open and closed)
closed - series of questions accompanied by a choice of answers (quantitative result)
open - open-ended questions - respondent writes how they feel or experienced something (qualitative)
semi-structured - combination of both open and closed questions
Questionnaire study
Calendar and Jackson - postal questionnaire sent out about rates of students going to university/ higher education
extremely low response rates impacted research
Questionnaire strengths
larger and more representative samples
can be used with geographically dispersed research population
less time consuming
reasonably cheap
useful for researching embarrassing or insensitive questions - guaranteed anonymity being done in private
minimum contact - researcher bias
positivists argue use of questionnaires is scientific
high reliability (repeated to get similar results)
statistical data can be compared and correlated
Questionnaire disadvantages
low response or even non-response
may not be representative of research population - undermines validity
postal questionnaires suffer from even worse response rate - eligibility for free prize draw drives costs up
difficult to go in depth on questionnaire (interpretivist - low validity)
real life too complex to be categorised into closed questions
misinterpretation - undermines validity
only literate can complete
technical/ vague language - some cant understand (language barriers elaborated/ restricted)
artificial devices - not normal part of everyday life so could be responded to with suspicion (validity not guaranteed)
partial truth
imposition problem - measure what sociologist thinks is important rather than what the respondent feels
Interviews
most successful carried out in private, neutral, and unthreatening venues
interviewers trained in interviewing skills such as listening skills and body language
Interviews - structured interviews
researcher reading out a list of closed questions from an interview schedule
based on pre-set fixed categories
interviewer passive role - cannot deviate from questions
converted to quantitative form (very similar to questionnaires)
Structured interview study
Chubb and Moe
parental attitudes towards education
can have an impact on educational outcomes
Structured interviews - positivists
very keen on method as theyre seen as scientific
highly reliable and easily repeatable
Structured interviews strengths
use of closed questions allows for quantitative factual data
conducted quick quickly
possible for representative sample as many interviews can take place
interviewers can explain the aims and objectives of the research to clarify instructions
better response rate than questionnaires
pre-coded answers increase reliability
Structured interviews disadvantages
artificial devices, suspicion, reduce reliability
discomfort and unease
inflexible due to rigid structure - impossible to pursue interesting leads
dont capture dynamic and changing nature of social life
may be interpreted differently to the interpretation intended by respondent - undermining validity
interpretivists argue closed interviews suffer from imposition problem (measure what sociologist thinks is important instead of what respondent thinks)
Unstructured interviews
guided, informal conversation
researcher plays active role keeping subject to the researcher
more flexible without interview schedule
happy to follow respondent and follow up ideas and responses
investigates motives and feelings
Unstructured interviews study
Becker
Chicago school teachers stereotypes
labelling of school children ultimately impacts educational outcome
Unstructured interviews - interpretivists
Keen as they are concerned with understanding the meaning and interpretations that underpin social life (how people interpret the world around them)
qualitative, valid
Unstructured interviews strengths
interpretivists as they allow researcher to establish an interaction/ relationship with the respondent - more likely to open up (build rapport)
allow researcher to get in the heads leading to more valid, qualitative data
respondent placed at centre of researcher
more likely to discuss sensitive or painful experiences (rapport)
flexible - may lead to new hypotheses
provide richer more vivid and colourful data therefore more valid
Unstructured interviews disadvantages
positivists - unscientific as they lack reliability (cannot be repeated and checked)
lack of objectivity due to the personal relationship established leading to bias results (interviewer bias)
a lot of data - data selected to be published may be bias to researchers thoughts and views
no pre-coded answers so difficult to analyse and impossible to quantify
fewer participants so less representative of the research population as its difficult to generalise
expensive as interviewers need to be trained
time consuming
Semi structured interviews
contain a lot of closed questions along with some open questions
allow interview some flexibility to ask for clarification of vague answers
adds depth and allow interviewer to assess whether the answers are truthful
reliability questioned as some interviewees need more probing than other
interviews cannot be compared as each one is difficult
Semi structured interviews study
Myhill and Jones
students’ perspectives on treatment of boys/ girls
Group interviews
carried out in groups rather than individuals
interviewer talks to a group (often used for children who feel threatened in interviewed one on one with adult) - status difference
offers reassurance
investigate dynamic of how particular group operates
more valid picture of behaviour may arise when in a group
peer pressure can appear when there’s one or two stronger personalities in the group undermining the validity of the data
Group interviews study
Willis
observed how ‘lads’ developed anti-school subcultures despite values pushed by teachers