Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM


Top Flashcards (Certified)
All Flashcards

Psychology Year 1 > Research Methods > Flashcards

Research Methods Flashcards

1
Q

Reliability

A

Consistency in results

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Validity

A

Testing what the hypothesis claims (true to your prediction)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Paradigm

A

The basic assumptions and methods of a study (accepted by members of a group)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Paradigm shifts

A

When an important change in basic concepts and experimental practices of a scientific discipline occur

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Objectivity

A

Unbiased by the researcher

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Replicability

A

To repeat research and get the same findings using a standardised, controlled approach

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Falsifiability

A

A theory is only scientific if it is possible to establish as false - if they survive attempts to falsify they are strong theories

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Empirical method

A

Using a procedure that means you are only measuring what can be directly observed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Nominal data

A

Data in named categories, eg. Tall, Short

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Ordinal data

A

Data ordered in some form, eg. 1st, 2nd

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Interval data

A

Data measured using units of equal intervals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Ratio data

A

Data measured using units of equal intervals, not passing 0

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Lab experiments

A

Iv manipulated, high controlled setting preventing the influence of extraneous variables
Strengths: cause and effect can be established
Weaknesses: low ecological validity - can’t be generalised to real life
increased chance of demand characteristics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Field experiments

A

Iv manipulated, naturalistic setting
Strengths: less change of experiment effects on results
high ecological validity
Weaknesses: ethical issues with a lack of consent
less control over extraneous variables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Natural experiments

A

Iv cannot be manipulated, dv is simply measured and judged as the effect of the iv
Strengths: high ecological validity
demand characteristics are often not an issue
Weaknesses: sample bias as participants can’t be randomly allocated to a condition
ethical issues with a lack of informed consent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Quasi experiments

A

Iv is naturally occurring and pre-determined, the iv is a difference between participants that already exists
Strengths: high ecological validity - the iv is naturally occurring so generalisable to real life
Weaknesses: low internal validity - lack of control over extraneous variables so the researcher can’t always accurately assess the effects of the iv - issues with cause and effect
non-replicable because reliability can’t be checked

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Hypotheses

A

A clear, concise, testable statement that suggests the relationship between independent and dependent variables to be investigated (written in future tense)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Null hypotheses

A

Predicts there will be no difference/ correlation found in the results

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Experimental hypotheses

A

Predicts there will be a significant difference/ correlation in the results between the two conditions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

One tailed/ directional

A

States the iv with affect the dv in a specific direction (prediction can be made with previous evidence)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Two tailed/ non-directional

A

States there will be a difference found between the conditions of the independent variable, however the direction is not stated (no previous evidence)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Independent measures

A

Each participant is selected randomly for one condition only

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Repeated measures

A

The same participants take part in both conditions

24
Q

Match pairs

A

Participants are matched in pairs based on a shared characteristic, one member of each pair is placed in a separate condition

25
Mean
All scores are added together and divided by the total number of scores
26
Median
The middle value found in an ordered set of data
27
Mode
The most frequent value in a set of data
28
Range
The difference between the highest and lowest score Strengths: easy to calculate Weaknesses: distorted by extreme values
29
Standard deviation
A measure of the spread of score around the mean Strengths: more precise Weaknesses: may hide the characteristics of the data
30
Histograms
Represents continuous data on interval and ratio scales, bars represent each score of a group of scores, height of each bar represents the frequency, bars should touch
31
Scattergraphs
Used with correlational analysis, for each individual two scores are obtained to plot one dot, co-variables determine the x and y position of the dot, the scatter of the dots indicates the degree of correlation between the co-variables
32
Bar charts
Used when data is nominal, or to represent the average score of different groups, each bar is separate on the x-axis
33
Line graphs
Represents continuous data, uses points connected by lines to show how something changes in value over time, typically iv on x-axis and dv on y-axis
34
Operationalising
Making variables measurable
35
Extraneous variables
Anything other than the iv that has the potential to affect the results: participant, situational, investigator effects, demand characteristics
36
Naturalistic vs controlled observations
Naturalistic- Observes naturally occurring behaviour The situation is not manipulated Produces data with high ecological validity Controlled- Observes behaviour in a prepared situation created by the researcher No manipulation of variables The researcher does not interfere in anyway
37
Participation vs non-participant observation
Participant- being involved in the observation group activities Non- participant- observing the group from an outsider perspective
38
Disclosed vs undisclosed observation
Disclosed- participants are aware of their observation Undisclosed- participants are unaware
39
Structured vs unstructured observation
Structured- events are observed in their natural setting and by an independent researcher Unstructured- researcher records all relevant behaviour without a system
40
Methods of recording behaviour
Tally chart Time sampling Event sampling
41
Double blind technique
Neither the researcher or participant is aware of which condition they are in
42
Pilot study
A small-scale preliminary study conducted to evaluate the performance of the study’s design
43
Operational definitions
A description that defines a measure to such a degree that everyone collects data the same way
44
Inter-observer reliability
The observers agree prior to the observation on the operationalised definition of the behaviour. The observers independently rate the behaviour and compare their results using correlations analysis
45
Overt vs covert observations
Overt- participants are aware they are being observed, their is no deception Covert- the researcher is undercover and the participants are unaware they are being observed
46
Evaluation of observational studies:
Pros- high ecological validity allows us to study variable usually too unethical to manipulate Cons- difficult to replicate unethical as participants are unaware they are being observed- no consent observer bias time consuming and requiring careful preparation
47
Counterbalancing
Half the participants take part in condition A followers by condition B and vise versa.
48
Pilot study
A small scale version of the full research prior to practice their observation technique and check inter-observer reliability.
49
Semi-structured interview
Interviewers prepare a set of questions which they can adapt and refine dependant on the responses of the interviewee.
50
Structured interview
Interviewer will ask a series of prepared closed questions in order to gain quantitative data
51
Correlations
Look for a relationship Have two co variables (not an IV and DV) Do not use an experimental design Plotted on a scattergraph
52
Case study
In-depth analysis of one person/group/event Information is obtained from a range of sources: interviews, questionnaires and observations
53
Content analysis
Process whereby qualitative information can be systematically converted into qualitative data It involves analysing transcripts in order to observe patterns and trends within the material
54
Thematic analysis
An alternative method of analysing qualitative data Rather than converting into quantitative form, in thematic analysis the data remains of a qualitative nature
55
Aim
Give the research study a clear focus A general statement outlining what the research intends to investigate

Psychology Year 1 (1 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2025 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions