Research Methods Flashcards

1
Q

Independent Variable

A

This is the variable that the researcher manipulates in order to determine its effect on the dependent variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Dependent Variable

A

Variable that is measured

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Extraneous Variables

A

Variable that COULD affect the DV

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Confounding Variables

A

Variables that HAVE affected the DV

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Operationalisation

A

IV and DV defined and stated how it should be measured

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Lab Experiment

A

Completed in a lab

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Field Experiment

A

Carried out in the real world

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Natural Experiment

A

Naturally occurring IV - comparing behaviour in single-sex school compared to mixed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Quasi Experiment

A

Naturally occurring IV taking place in a lab - difference between people that already exists such as levels of testosterone

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Non-Participant Observation

A

Researcher does not get directly involved with interactions of the participants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Participant Observation

A

Researcher is directly involved - also works out whilst collecting information at a gym

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Covert Observation

A

Psychologist goes undercover and does not reveal their true identity - group does not know they are being observed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Overt Observation

A

Psychologist reveals true identity and might also state they are observing the group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Naturalistic Observation

A

Researcher observes participants in their own natural environment and there is no deliberate manipulation of the IV

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Controlled Observation

A

Researcher observes participants in a controlled environment and this allows for manipulation of the IV

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Structured Interviews

A

Standardised order
Quantitative data
Closed questions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Unstructured Interviews

A

Informal in-depth conversation
Unplanned questions
Qualitative data
Open questions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Questionnaires

A

Closed/open questions
Must avoid:
Ambiguous questions and answers
Leading questions
Simple questions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Correlation Coefficient

A

Strength of a correlation, falls between -1 and 1

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Correlation

A

Positive or Negative
Shown in a scattergraph

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Null hypothesis

A

IV will have no effect on the DV

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Non-directional/two-tailed

A

Does not state what the effect of the IV is on the DV but suggests there is an effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Directional/one-tailed

A

Predicts the effect of the IV on the DV

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Alternative/experimental

A

Predicts that IV will have an effect on the DV

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Random Sampling
Every member of a target population has the same chance of being selected through RNG
26
Systematic Sampling
Participants are selected by taking every Nth person from a list
27
Stratified Sampling
Involves classifying the population into categories and then randomly choosing a sample which consists of participants in the same proportions as they are in the real world Categories - age, gender
28
Opportunity Sampling
Involves selecting participants who are readily available and want to take part
29
Volunteer Sampling
Involves people volunteering to take part in a study through the researcher advertising their study via leaflets, posters, radio
30
Pilot Studies
Small scale investigation of the real study in order to identify any flaws in the structure
31
Independent Groups Design
Different people used in each condition Randomly allocated participants to each condition
32
Repeated Measures Design
Each participant is tested in all conditions
33
Matched Pairs Design
People with matched characteristics that are important to the study are put into opposite groups
34
External Reliability
Whether a test results are consistent over time Test-retest method can be used to check
35
Test-Retest
Test done again to see if results are similar If they are, the results are reliable
36
Internal Reliability
Whether a test and the results are consistent within itself Split-half technique used to check
37
Split-Half
The questionnaire is split in half and if participants score similarly on both halves of the questionnaire then the questions are measuring the same factors and there is internal reliability
38
External Validity
Ecological, temporal, participant validity
39
Internal Validity
When the outcome of the study is a direct result of the manipulation of the IV and there are no confounding variables
40
Presumptive Consent
Consent gained from people of a similar background to the participants in a study
41
Prior General Consent
Involves participants agreeing to be deceived without knowing how or when it will occur - for example, “Would you be willing to take part in a future study based on memory, whereby the true aim of the study might be withheld?” If the participants agree, then you can conduct the study knowing that you have gained their informed consent prior (or before) the actual study
42
Retrospective Consent
Asking participants for consent after they have already participated in the study If they don't consent - data is destroyed
43
Protection from Harm
Investigators have responsibility to protect participants from physical and psychological harm during the study Psychologist must stop any study immediately if they suspect a participant may be harmed
44
Right to Withdraw
Participants can leave study at any time Participants can withdraw their data at any point in the future
45
Confidentiality
Participants' data is confidential and should not be disclosed to anyone Numbers or letters should be used instead of names
46
Deception
Ethics committee will approve or disapprove of experimental methods involving deception using a cost-benefit analysis test
47
Nominal (Discrete) Data
Data are in separate categories such as grouping people according to their favourite TV show or eye colour
48
Ordinal Data (Continuous Data)
Data that is ordered in some way Listing order of favourite music genres
49
Interval Data (Continuous Data)
Data is measured using units of equal intervals such as miles or centimetres
50
Primary Data
Information observed or collected directly from first-hand experience Primary data provides the exact type of data the researcher is looking for
51
Secondary Data
Information that was collected for another purpose Researcher could use the data collected for another study Usually less reliable than primary
52
Meta-Analysis
Combining results from a number of studies on a particular topic to provide an overall view
53
Mean
Most accurate measure and it takes into account all the scores Can be distorted by a single extreme value Mean score may not even be a value obtained
54
Median
Unaffected by extreme scores Not as sensitive as the mean because not all scores are used in the calculation so it can be unrepresentative of the data if scores are clustered around high/low levels
55
Range
Quick and easy to calculate Easily distorted by extreme values
56
Standard Deviation
Takes into account all the scores More difficult to calculate than the range and can only be used on interval data
57
Inferential Statistics
When you assume that the results obtained from one study on one category of people will be the same for another category So if Coke improves memory for women it will also improve memory for men
58
Descriptive Statistics
Measures of central tendency and dispersion
59
Level of Statistical Significance
Level at which the decision is made to reject the null hypothesis Certain that the IV is having effect on DV and is not due to chance
60
Chance
Something has no real cause, it just happens - no real cause
61
Level of significance
Chance of results being due to chance/fluke is p<0.05 (5%) Used when there is a directional one-tailed hypothesis p<0.01 when research findings are critical and can be difference between life or death
62
Sign Test
State hypothesis Count number of + and - Choose less frequent sign Identify N (don't count participants with 0) Select critical value Compare S value to critical value If S is equal to or less than critical value the results are significant and we accept experimental hypothesis
63
Report - Title
Should provide clear focus of the study and should involve the key variables that are being investigated, should not be too vague or too specific
64
Report - Abstract (150-200 words long)
Provides clear and concise summary of the entire investigation Includes information such as background research, aims, hypothesis, methodology, experimental design, sample used
65
Type 1 Error
Occurs if an investigator rejects a null hypothesis that is actually true in the population
66
Type 2 Error
Occurs if the investigator fails to reject a null hypothesis that is actually false in the population
67
Correlation Advantages
1. This technique does allow psychologists to establish the strength of the relationship between two variables and measure it precisely. 2. This technique also allows researchers to investigate things that could not be manipulated experimentally for ethical or practical reasons. 3. Once a correlation has been conducted predictions can be made about one of the variables based on what is known about the other variable.
68
Correlation Disadvantages
1. Correlational analysis cannot demonstrate cause and effect; we cannot tell which variable influences the other. 2. Even if there is a correlation between two variables it may be the case that the variables are not actually related but that there is a third unknown variable which influences both (confounding variable) 3. Correlations can only measure linear relationships and does not detect curvilinear relationships. This is when there is a positive relationship up to a certain point but after that the relationship becomes negative or vice versa.
69
Replicability
The extent to which the findings of research can be repeated in different contexts and circumstances
70
Purposes of Replicability
a) Guarding against scientific fraud b) Researchers can check to see if results gained were “a one off fluke” possibly caused by extraneous/confounding variables c) If research findings can be repeated, we would say that the findings are reliable d) Replicability can also indicate that research findings are valid
71
Falsifiability
The notion that scientific theories can potentially be disproved by evidence, it is the hallmark of science. It refers to proving a hypothesis wrong
72
Nominal and Independent
Chi squared
73
Nominal and Repeated
Sign
74
Nominal and Association
Chi squared
75
Ordinal and Independent
Mann Whitney - Less than or equal to be significant
76
Ordinal and Repeated
Wilcoxon
77
Ordinal and Association
Spearman's Rho
78
Interval and Independent
Unrelated t-test
79
Interval and Repeated
Related t-test
80
Interval and Association
Pearson's R