Research Methodology Flashcards
determinism
assumption of order, not randomness or chaos. Events have systematic, meaningful causes.
parsimony
the pragmatic recommendation that, everything else being equal, we should prefer simplicity over complexity. Explanations and causes should not include unnecessary factors or processes. If there are two valid explanations; then the simpler one of the two should be accepted.
Occam’s Razor
Simplicity over unnecessary complexity.
testability
ideas should be (dis)confirmable using available research techniques
systematic empiricism
structured and organised approach to gathering data/observations in order to answer questions
theory
general principle or set of principles that explain a phenomenon or event
concept/construct
labels that refer to abstract ideas
e.g., intelligence, memory, happiness, depression
hypothesis
prediction to be tested in a research study
research ethics
application of moral principles and practice to consider the risks versus benefits of doing a research study
population
set of individuals that the research question focuses on
variables
concrete indicator of a concept/construct, that is measured or manipulated using observable methods
process
a general term to describe operations or relationships
theoretical/conceptual framework
a more formal way of articulating or presenting a set of principles. A framework is a set of principles that is presented in a systematic or structured way
research rationale
An argument for why/how this new study makes a novel contribution to existing knowledge. Including ‘making a novel contribution to’: theory/conceptual understanding, methodology, and practice.
score
response on variable of interest to psychology
groups
any categorisation, collective units of individuals. There are many used in psychology.
null hypothesis
H0 = statement that there is no effect. There is no difference between the groups/there is no relationship between the variables
experimental/alternative hypothesis
H1 = statement that there is an effect. There is a difference between the groups/there is a relationship between the variables
directional hypothesis
states the nature of the effect between variables/relationship between groups
non-directional hypothesis
states the overall effect only. There is a difference between the groups/there is a relationship between the variables
systematic variation
variation due to the effect that is being investigated.
unsystematic/random/error/residual variation
variation due to reasons other than the effect that is being investigated in the research question
probability
chance of an event occurring, ranging from 0 (certainly will not occur) to 1 (certainly will occur)
BPS four general principles
1) respect for the autonomy, privacy, and dignity of individuals and communities. 2) maximising benefit and minimising harm. 3) scientific integrity. 4) social responsibility.
autonomy
independence; freedom from external control or influence
privacy
state of being free from public attention
dignity
being worthy of honour and respect
scientific integrity
being correct and honest. Being truthful in the way that we conduct and report scientific research
social responsibility
the duty to act in the best interests of individuals and communities
coercion
persuasion using threats or force (physical or psychological)
confidentiality
maintenance of participants’ privacy
anonymity
cannot identify individuals from their responses
passive deception
withholding full truth or key pieces of relevant information
active deception
intentionally misinforming participants about the true state of affairs in a study
experimental realism
extent to which a study engages participants’ attention and feels like a genuine activity/experience to them
researcher control
holding everything constant except variables of interest
sampling error
the likely difference/discrepancy between the results found in a particular sample and the results that would have been obtained in the population
Within-participants manipulation
each participant is in every condition of the study and provides a DV score in every condition
between-participants manipulation
each participant is in one condition/group of the study and provides a DV score for that one condition.
practice effect
task can get easier in each new condition
interference effect
task can get harder in each new condition
counterbalancing
systematically varying the order in which participants complete the conditions in a within-participant’s design
true experiment
random assignment of individuals to conditions/groups
quasi experiment
non-random assignment of individuals to conditions/groups; it makes use of pre-existing groups e.g gender