Research Into Obedience-Milgrim Flashcards

1
Q

What was the aim of Zimbardo’s 1973 study on conformity to social roles?

A

To examine how readily people would conform to new roles in a simulated prison environment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How many participants were involved in Zimbardo’s study?

A

Twenty-four psychologically stable and healthy males.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How were participants allocated to their roles in the study?

A

They were randomly allocated to either the role of Prisoner or Prison Guard.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What was the payment given to participants in Zimbardo’s study?

A

$15 a day.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What roles did the participants take on in Zimbardo’s study?

A

Prisoner and Prison Guard.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Describe the initial treatment of prisoners in Zimbardo’s study.

A

Prisoners were ‘arrested’ at home, strip searched, disinfected, and assigned a number.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What were the guards instructed to do in Zimbardo’s study?

A

To enforce the prison rules.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What uniform did the guards wear in the study?

A

Khaki uniform and reflective sunglasses.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What role did Zimbardo take on during the study?

A

Prison Superintendent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How long was the study originally planned to last?

A

Two weeks.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What was a significant behavioral change observed in prisoners during the study?

A

They became increasingly submissive and accepting of their situation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What mental health issues did some prisoners experience?

A

Depression and anxiety.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How many prisoners had to be released before day 6, and why?

A

Five prisoners due to extreme reactions such as crying and acute anxiety.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What did prisoners primarily discuss during the study?

A

Prison life and referred to each other by their prison number.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What behavioral change was noted in the guards during the study?

A

They became increasingly aggressive and sadistic.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What actions did guards take against prisoners?

A

They forced them to perform degrading tasks and woke them at night.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What did Zimbardo observe about his own behavior during the study?

A

He became an indifferent superintendent and did not stop psychological abuse.

18
Q

Why was the study discontinued after 6 days?

A

Due to the psychological damage of the participants.

19
Q

What type of conformity was observed in the participants of Zimbardo’s study?

A

Identification.

20
Q

What situational factor was believed to influence the guards’ behavior?

A

The prison environment.

21
Q

True or False: The participants showed sadistic tendencies before the study.

22
Q

Fill in the blank: The study showed how attitudes and behaviors are shaped by the _______.

A

[roles people play].

23
Q

What is the definition of proximity in the context of Milgram’s study?

A

Refers to the ‘closeness’ of the participant to the outcomes of their actions or the authority figure giving orders.

24
Q

What was the obedience rate when the teacher and learner were in the same room?

25
When the teacher had to force the learner's hand onto the electroshock plate, what was the obedience rate?
30%
26
What was the obedience rate when the experimenter gave instructions by telephone?
20.5%
27
True or False: Increased proximity to negative consequences decreases feelings of personal responsibility.
False
28
How does closer proximity to the authority figure affect obedience?
Increases obedience due to perceived legitimacy and fear of punishment.
29
What effect does the location of the study have on perceptions of legitimacy?
Affects the perceived legitimacy of authority.
30
What was the obedience rate in the replication conducted in a run-down office building?
47.5%
31
How did the run-down office building affect participants' perception of the experimenter's authority?
It was perceived to have less 'legitimate authority' compared to Yale University.
32
What is the significance of the authority figure's uniform in Milgram's study?
Influences the perceived legitimacy of their authority status.
33
What was the obedience rate when a confederate in casual clothes replaced the experimenter?
20%
34
True or False: Uniforms increase the authority figure's perceived societal status.
True
35
What did Bickman's (1974) study in New York demonstrate about uniforms?
The appearance of the individual can influence people's behavior to obey.
36
What were the obedience rates for the 'Guard', 'Milkman', and everyday clothes in Bickman's study?
* Guard: 76% * Milkman: 47% * Everyday clothes: 30%
37
In Milgram's research, what are the three situational variables affecting obedience?
* Proximity * Location * Uniform
38
Fill in the blank: When participants feel more personal responsibility for their actions, they are more likely to remain in an _______ state.
autonomous
39
What effect does seeing an authority figure as legitimate have on obedience?
Increases likelihood of obedience to avoid sanctions.
40
Ethical issues-limitation
Significant deception involved E.g study was supposedly about effects of punishment on learning and that mr Wallace was receiving shocks right to withdraw-met with verbal prods when trying to continue making them feel they couldn’t withdraw Psychological harm-extremely stressful situations leading to psychological damage e.g nervous laughter expressed how emotionally distressing it was
41
Practical applications-strength
Provided useful knowledge for society in helping to understand how certain situational factors can influence people in society to obey and can be useful for policy makers trying to influence public behaviour E.g may help to explain current events such as Russian soldiers wishing to soo fighting in Ukraine and yet continuing to to obey
42
Methodological point-strength
Ability to be replicated and to carefully manipulate the design of the study to investigate factors effecting obedience By changing aspects of the design within his later variation studies Milgrim was able to gather important information about the various situational factors, such as proximity, location and uniform which makes obedience more or less likely