Research integrity and the Scientific Process (wk1) Flashcards
What is research integrity?
Conducting research in ways that are aligned with professional standards so that others can have confidence in the methods and use the research findings
What are the key elements of research integrity?
Honesty, rigour, transparency, reliability, accountability, care and respect of participants
What are research ethics?
Research practice viewed from the perspective of moral principles
Describe the rationale for research ethics
-Recognising differences between invasive/ non-invasive practices
-If humans are involved or not
-Different board approval
-Whether the army or animals are used or not
Scientific integrity case study example
-HRA
-The HRA (Health Research Authority) protects interest of patients and public in health and social care research
-HRA aims to build public confidence and improve the nation’s health
-HRA approval is applied to all study types in England. This brings together legal compliance, ethics review and safety
-The approval provides assurance to NHS organisations
List the ethical issues that can arise (9):
-Research question -> new, innovative, relevant, important
-Research design -> subtle, peer reviewed, ethical
-No. of ppts -> appropriate, feasible, robust
-Research team -> experience, environment
-Risks/benefits -> balance between harm/benefits
-Recruitment/compensation -> dependence, what is reasonable?
-Respecting confidentiality -> good practice with data handling
-Publication of results -> when will this happen, open access?
-Informed consent -> well-informed, voluntary
List the shared values in research (4)
-Honesty -> Convey information truthfully and honouring commitments
-Accuracy -> Report findings precisely and take care to avoid errors
-Efficiency -> Use resources wisely and avoid waste
-Objectivity -> Let the facts speak for themselves and avoid improper bias
List the steps in the scientific process and describe the process
-The process can occur at any point
-Research is always refined and accurate through this process
-Make observations
-Think of interesting observations
-Formulate hypotheses
-Develop testable predictions
-Gather data to test predictions
-Develop general theories
-Refine, alter, expand or reject hypotheses
Outline the Hierarchy of Evidence
-Draw the diagram
-Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of random controlled trials have the highest quality of evidence with the lowest risk of bias
-Expert opinions are at the bottom of the hierarchy even though they are listened to e.g. Andrew Wakefield
Outline the Adjusted Hierarchy of Evidence
-Draw diagram
-The revised pyramid is where systematic reviews/meta-analysis are a lens to view the evidence