Research Hypotheses - Week 1 Flashcards
How Hypotheses (and experiments) are often created? - (2 answers)
- Observation of a relationship
- Thought of after reading about Previous research in the field.
- the object is to Improve on the original research (e.g., better use of IVs & DVs etc).
An Experiment must be a form that is… (3 answers).
- Repeatable - ( the findings can be consistently emulated in Different locations and at different times).
- Observable
- Testable
(Observability and Testability relates to the ability to Quantitatively measure variables).
Verbally formulating the research hypothesis… Statements (3 answers)
- Synthetic
- Analytic
- Contradictory
Synthetic Statement
True/False (good statement)
A Synthetic statement therefore allows the research hypothesis to be expressed in the “General Implication Form” - “If X then Y”.
Analytic Statement
Always true (NOT good) ‘I am OR am not going to do my homework’ .
Contradictory Statement
Always False (NOT good). ‘I am AND am not going to do my homework’.
General Implication Form
‘if X then Y’
The general implication form is what you want in a research hypothesis.
So, Falsifiability is a characteristic of such a statement.
Falsifiability
or Refutability is the capacity for a statement, theory or hypothesis to be contradicted by evidence.
And that is what you want. Theories that cannot be refuted are Pseudo-science, because there’s no way of proving them.
Induction or Inductive Logic/Reasoning
The taking of Particular examples and creating a General, theoretical statement.
- P.I.G -
Through Induction the conclusion contains More information than has been determined from observation.
The relations between Induction and Deduction can and do interact with each other.
Observation (from one situation) ⬇️ Induction ⬇️ THEORY ⬇️ Deduction ⬇️ Predicted observation (in another situation).
So, if the theory is VALID, specific conclusions can be made in Different circumstances.
Deduction or Deductive Logic/Reasoning
To test an Hypothesis = Deduction.
- General > Deduction > Particular.
Once the hypothesis has been derived through Induction, then it can be experimentally tested using Deduction.
That’s when you have a General case (the Hypothesis), and you test it with the prediction of a Particular outcome.
e.g., a deductive statement on the ‘Bystander Effect’ -
IF a person pretends to have a seizure on a subway, THEN that person will receive Less assistance when there are More bystanders present.
The relations between Deduction and Induction can and do interact with each other.
Observation (from one situation) ⬇️ Induction ⬇️ THEORY ⬇️ Deduction ⬇️ Predicted observation (in another situation).
So, if the theory is VALID, specific conclusions can be made in Different circumstances.
Types of Theories - (3 answers)
- Descriptive -
theories name ‘describe’ events. (Problem - don’t necessarily EXPLAIN WHY these events occur, or what causes them). - Analogical -
attempt to explain a RELATIONSHIP using an example or Analogy from another field of science. (e.g., the ‘computer analogy of the brain’ is the most famous in psychology). (Problem - ultimately an explanatory Limit will have been reached - the human brain is very different to a modern computer). - Quantitative -
explain a relationship using PRECISE VALUES and MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSIONS. (not so common in psychology - behaviour more difficult to precisely quantify).
Most theories in psychology remain DESCRIPTIVE or ANALOGICAL.
What makes a good (valid) theory?
- The theory should account for most of the data (contradicting data tends to disconfirm the theory).
- The theory should also be Testable (those that aren’t are sometimes called UNFALSIFIABLE, and are considered ‘pseudoscience’.
- UNFALSIFIABLE theories are theories NO AMOUNT of findings can ever DISCONFIRM.
- A theory should also make PREDICTIONS.
The basis of Psychology
Is (simplistically) to determine REASONS behind human BEHAVIOUR - (the causes of behaviour).
Science involves…
Establishing RELATIONSHIPS between an EVENT and a set of PRECEDING CIRCUMSTANCES.
- Science is not a thing, BUT A PROCESS.
The ‘SCIENTIFIC’ method - (4 answers)
- Objectivity - (not to let your Biases affect your Question or Findings).
- Confirmation of Findings (e.g., replication) - (repeating a study should have the same outcome).
- Self-Correction - (ability to alter conclusions) - if in contrast to what is expected.
- Control - to make certain that your findings are the best they can be by controlling Extraneous Variables.