Research & Evaluation of the MSM Flashcards

1
Q

what evidence supports the capacity of the sensory register?

A

whole or partial report technique: participants were asked to recall the whole (or part) array such as a line. In tachistoscope.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what evidence supports the coding of STM?

A
Baddeley (1966)
Participants were divided into groups and given different lists of words to learn then recall
Acoustically Similar (mad, man, map)
Acoustically Dissimilar (pen, few, day)
Semantically Similar (great, big, large)
Semantically Dissimilar (hot, old, late)
Acoustically dissimilar words were recalled more accurately than acoustically similar, so there must be some acoustic confusion in the recall, which suggests that coding is acoustic.
Other lists were recalled much better 60-80% accurate recall, the little difference in the semantic lists means that this is not the coding in STM
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what evidence supports the capacity of STM?

A

The Magic number 7 (plus or minus two) provides evidence for the capacity of short term memory.
Most adults can store between 5 and 9 items in their short-term memory.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

who put forward the ‘magic number 7’ theory?

A

Miller (1956)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What evidence supports the duration of STM?

A

Peterson and Peterson (1959)
Participants saw a trigram, then had an interference task, like counting backwards in 3s, to prevent repetition of the trigram.
Then asked to recall.
After 3 seconds 90% were recalled
After 18 seconds 5% were recalled
This suggests that STM lasts little longer than 18 seconds, but when people aren’t expecting to recall, other research suggests it lasts much less

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What evidence supports the coding of LTM?

A
Baddeley (1966)
Participants were divided into groups and given lists of words to learn then recall immediately
Acoustically Similar (mad, man, map)
Acoustically Dissimilar (pen, few, day)
Semantically Similar (great, big, large)
Semantically Dissimilar (hot, old, late)
Semantically dissimilar words were recalled more accurately than semantically similar, so there must be some semantic confusion in recall, which suggests that coding is semantic.
The little difference in the acoustic lists means that this is not the coding in LTM
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what evidence supports the duration of LTM?

A

Bahrick et al (1975)
They aimed to investigate long term memory over decades. They asked 392 American ex-high school students aged 17-74 were studied. They were asked to free recall the names of their classmates, then were shown faces and names of classmates and asked if they recognised them.
90% accuracy in face and name after 34 years
80% name recognition after 48 years
40% face recognition after 48 years
Free recall were less accurate
60% after 15 years
30% after 48 years
Bahrick concluded that LTM can last a lifetime, even though they may weaken. Recognition is better than recall

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what has research shown about the process of rehearsal?

A

Glanzer and Cunitz
Found that if participants were prevented from rehearsing a list of one syllable words for a short period by counting backwards in threes, they could remember the first words in the presentation, but not those presented in the middle or the end. If participants were allowed to recall immediately, they remembered both the words at the beginning and the end. This is known as the primacy-recency effect, which supports LTM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what has research shown about methods of rehearsal?

A

Participants were asked questions about stimulus words at different processing ‘levels’.
The words with questions that required a ‘shallow level’ of processing, for example “is the word printed in capital letters?”, were less likely to be recalled than words with questions that required a ‘deep level’ of processing, for example, “is the word a type of fruit?”. This suggests that other methods other than repetition have a role in passing information. This provides counter evidence to MSM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Which case study does MSM fail to explain?

A

Clive Wearing
He had very little long term memory for events, after a virus damaged his hippocampus. But he could still remember skills, such as playing the piano, which counter the suggestion that they were unitary stores

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what is an application of MSM?

A

the model informs students that to pass information into a permanent store , they need to repeat the rehearsal of the information required. Just reading it once would not be considered effective rehearsal, according to the model

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the 4 evaluation points for the msm?

A
  1. supporting evidence
  2. case studies
  3. long-term memory involves more than maintenance rehearsal
  4. how separate are STM and LTM?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what is the PEEL paragraph for the MSM evaluation point ‘supporting evidence’?

A

P- controlled lab studies on capacity, duration and coding support the existence of a separate short- and long-term store, which is the basis of the MSM
E- for instance, studies using brain scanning techniques have demonstrated that there is a difference between STM and LTM.
E- Beardsley (1997) found that the prefrontal cortex is active during STM but not LTM tasks.
L- this evidence therefore provides strong support for the MSM.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what is the PEEL paragraph for the MSM evaluation point ‘case studies’?

A

P - psychologists have shown that different areas of the brain are involved in STM and LTM from their study of individuals with brain damage.
E - for instance, Scoville and Milner examined a brain-damaged man called HM. His brain damage was caused by an operation to remove the hippocampus, from both sides of his brain, to reduce his severe epilepsy.
E - HM’s personality and intellect remained intact but he could not form new LTMs, although he could remember things from before the surgery.
L - this provides support for the MSM’s notion of separate stores, as HM was unable to transfer information from his STM to LTM, but was able to retrieve information from before his surgery (from his LTM).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what is the PEEL paragraph for the MSM evaluation point ‘long-term memory involves more than maintenance rehearsal’?

A

P - the MSM has been criticised for its emphasis on maintenance rehearsal.
Exp - Craik and Lockhart (1972) suggested that enduring memories are created by the processing that you do, rather than through maintenance rehearsal. Things that are processed more deeply are more memorable just because of the way they are processed.
E - Craik and Tulving (1975) gave participants a list of nouns (e.g. ‘shark’) and asked a question that involved shallow or deep processing - asked whether a word was printed in caps (shallow processing) or asked whether the word fitted in a sentence (deep processing). The participants ultimately remembered more words in the task involving deep processing rather than shallow processing.
L - this suggests that the process of rehearsal does not fully explain the process of creating long-term memories. ‘Deep’ or elaborative processing is also a key part of the process.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what is the PEEL paragraph for the MSM evaluation point ‘how separate are STM and LTM’?

A

P - the multi-store model suggests that STM is involved before LTM. This claim has been questioned by other researchers.
Exp - Logie (1999) pointed out that STM actually relies on LTM and therefore cannot come ‘first’.
E - for instance, Ruchkin et al (2003) demonstrated this by asking participants to recall a set of words and pseudo-words. They found that there was much more brain activity when real worlds were processed compared to pseudowords - indicating the involvement of other areas of the brain than just STM.
L - this research suggests that STM is actually just a part of LTM and not a separate store.

17
Q

what did Peterson and Peterson do in 1959?

A

trigram experiment

18
Q

what was the aim and method of Peterson and Peterson’s Trigram Retention Experiment in 1959?

A

AIM: find duration of STM
METHOD: ppts shown trigram and asked to recall after varying amounts of time (3-18 seconds)
Between seeing trigram and recall ppt did a distraction task (counting back in 3s from a large number) = prevent rehearsal to LTM

19
Q

what were the results from Peterson and Peterson’s Trigram Retention Experiment in 1959?

A

90% recall after 3 seconds

Recall reduced with time, only 6% after 18 secs

20
Q

what did the results from Peterson and Peterson’s Trigram Retention Experiment show?

A

if we are unable to rehearse information, it will not be passed to long-term memory, providing further support for the multi-store model and the idea of discrete components.

21
Q

give 3 weaknesses of the Peterson and Peterson’s Trigram Retention Experiment

A
  1. used 24 psychology students so they may have encountered the multi-store model of memory previously and therefore may have demonstrated demand characteristics by changing their behaviour to assist the experimenter.
  2. the memory of psychology students may be different from that of other people, especially if they had previously studied strategies for memory improvement. As a result, we are unable to generalise the results of this study to non-psychology students.
  3. has low levels of ecological validity. In this study, participants were asked to recall three-letter trigrams, which is unlike anything people would want to memorise in their everyday lives. As a result, we are unable to apply these results to everyday examples of memory and are unable to conclude if the duration of short-term memory may be longer for more important information i.e. memorising a phone number.
22
Q

what was the aim and method of Baddley’s experiment?

A
AIM: assess whether coding in STM and LTM is mainly acoustic or semantic
METHOD: Participants were divided into groups and given different lists of words to learn then recall
Acoustically Similar (mad, man, map)
Acoustically Dissimilar (pen, few, day)
Semantically Similar (great, big, large)
Semantically Dissimilar (hot, old, late)
23
Q

what is the phonological similarity effect?

A

similar-sounding words and letters are acoustically confused in STM, making them more difficult to recall