research designs, validity, reliability and sample selection Flashcards
What is naturalistic observation?
• Collect data about naturally occurring behaviour
• Used when manipulation of variables is not possible/ethical/preferable
• Can still predict behaviour even though we cannot infer causes
• Good in early explanatory stages or for relating naturally occurring variables
• Third variable problem
• Direction of causality
• Solutions:
o Control for possible covariates
o Longitudinal assessment
Unique features:
o Unobtrusiveness of researcher/observer
o Researcher must remain aloof to record natural behaviour
o Researcher tries not to let participants know they are being watched
• Reactive nature of measurement and observation
o Awareness of being observed may alter behaviour
• Pro:
o Obtain accurate descriptions
• Con:
o Purely correlational, cannot isolate causes
What is the experimental approach?
• Observation under controlled conditions by systematically varying one or more variables
• Used to determine cause using canons of deductive logic
o Temporal precedence: effect -> cause
o Agreement: effect when cause is present
o Difference: effect when cause absent
o Concomitant variation: rule out alternative explanations
Outline the experimental method
Used to determine cause using canons of deductive logic
o Temporal precedence: effect -> cause
o Agreement: effect when cause is present
o Difference: effect when cause absent
o Concomitant variation: rule out alternative explanations
o One or more variables having at least 2 different levels that are systematically changed by experimenter
• Observe effect on DV(s)
• Control extraneous variables
• Random assignment to groups
o Evenly distributes abnormalities or irregularities across groups
• Replication necessary
Advantages of experimental method
Better support for cause-effect relationships
Greater control over all aspects of research
Ability to precisely manipulate variables of interest
Findings shown to be more enduring over time (can be used as a basis for more applied research)
May need fewer PPs than non-experimental research
May be easier to write up findings
Disadvantages of experimental method
Experiments are artificial and contrived
May not translate to real-life situations
May not be generalizable to other populations
May cause more reactionary response from PPs
Difficult to manipulate certain constructs
Basic vs applied research goals
Basic
Advance knowledge
Identify relationships and constructs
Identify relationships among causes
Applied
Solve problems
Yield large effects
Predict future events
Internal validity
Internal Validity is the approximate truth about inferences regarding cause-effect or causal relationships.
extent of cause-effect claims
o Threats:
History: external events other than treatment between conditions
Maturation: changes over time due to age/fatigue
Selection: sampling bias for different conditions
Attrition: condition-sensitive drop-out
Testing: pretesting suggests hypothesis
Instrumentation: change in observer measurement criteria, lack of standardisation/calibration (unreliable measures lead to low internal validity, you may get a different result every time you do the experiment)
Statistical regression: ‘extreme’ PPs will tend to be closer to the mean on retesting
Extraneous influences on task performance.
External validity
extent that findings can be generalised
o Threats:
Selection/sampling: effect may only apply to sampled group
Experimental setting: effects of constrained setting and PPs’ knowledge they are being tested may limit generalizability
Testing: pre-test of other experimental treatments may result in atypical behaviour
Construct validity
extent to which instruments measure what they claim to measure
Scales that have not been pre-tested. Scales should be constructed properly, possibly apply FA method to see whether all items relate to same construct.
Convergent validity
Extent to which measure is consistent with other measures of the same construct
Discriminant validity
Discriminant validity: high score on construct does not equal the same as high score on measure of ‘wrong’ construct
i.e. scale should be able to discriminate between constructs. Anxiety scale should assess only anxiety, should not yield same scores as a scale measuring self-esteem as these are very different constructs.
Reliability
• Comparable results over time/observations
Test should yield consistent scores for same participant over time
Kinds of reliability for measures
o Test-retest reliability: test repeated over time
o Parallel-forms reliability: parallel forms of test applied over time
o Split-half reliability: parallel forms of test applied intermingled
•Observer/judgement reliability: Inter-observer reliability
Sampling aims
- Population: all members of group
- Sample: group selected from population
- Aim: to get sample that is representative of target population
- Ideal: to sample proportionally, representing every type in population
- Sampling usually prone to sampling bias
- Representative sample not necessary unless the researcher needs to generalise
Opportunity sampling
o Recruit whoever is available at a particular time or in a particular location
Bias- i.e. all students on the same campus