Research Designs Flashcards

identify the design by example

1
Q

Observe that somebody jogs (treatment) and notice the jogger is slim. Assume jogging caused slimness (but could have been skinny before jogging)

A

Pre-experimental designs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q
  1. Introduce spelling program in a class 2. Measure spelling ability afterwards. (No evidence that spelling ability improved because we have no prior measure.)
A

Pre-experimental designs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

From 1980-88 President Reagan increased US defense spending. Between 1989 - 1991, the USSR collapsed. So Reagan caused the collapse of the USSR

A

Pre-experimental designs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Perversity

A

Claims that an attempted reform or policy will actually make the problem worse

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Example of perversity

A

Raising the minimum wage will only lead to more unemployment because businesses won’t be able to afford workers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Jeopardy

A

Argues that implementing a reform will threaten an existing valuable achievement or system

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Example of jeopardy

A

If we introduce universal healthcare, it will destroy the quality of our current healthcare system

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Futility

A

Claims that a proposed change will not actually make a difference or will be ineffective

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Example of futility

A

No matter how many laws we pass, people will always find ways to break them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Imminent danger

A

We must act now or else things will get worse

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Example of synergy

A

As technology advances, social equality will naturally improve on its own

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Historic inevitability

A

Argues that social developments follow a fixed, predetermined course and cannot be altered by reforms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Example of historic inevitability

A

Capitalism will always dominate because history shows that socialism inevitably fails

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Spurious Relationship

A

A false cause-and-effect claim based on correlation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Example of spurious relationship

A

Crime has gone down since we introduced stricter immigration laws, so immigration must have been the cause of crime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the difference between deterministic and probabilistic causation

A

Deterministic causation means X always leads to Y, while probabilistic causation means X increases the likelihood of Y.

17
Q

What are the three conditions for causality

A

(1) Correlation, (2) Time order (cause happens before effect), (3) Non-spuriousness (no third variable explaining the relationship).

18
Q

What is a tautological relationship

A

A circular argument where the dependent and independent variable are defined in a way that guarantees correlation

19
Q

What is an experimental research design

A

A study that randomly assigns participants to conditions to test causal relationships

20
Q

What is pre-experimental design

A

A study that measures participants before and after an intervention

21
Q

What is an atheoretical/descriptive case study

A

A case study used to generate new theories based on observations

22
Q

What is a disciplined interpretive case study

A

A case study used to test an existing theory

23
Q

What is a least likely case study

A

A study of a case that is unlikely to support a theory, but if it does, the theory is strengthened

24
Q

What is a most likely case study

A

A study of a case that strongly supports a theory, reinforcing its validity

25
What is a deviant case study
A study of an unusual or unexpected case that does not fit existing theories.
26
What is a major threat to inference in pre-test/post-test designs
History effects and testing effects
27
What is a major threat to inference in observational research designs
Confounding variables and reverse causation
28
What is a major threat to inference in cross-sectional studies
Lack of temporal order
29
What is a major threat to inference in longitudinal studies
Attrition (dropout bias) and time-related confounders
30
What is a major threat to inference in case studies
Limited generalizability and researcher bias
31
What are the key characteristics of an atheoretical/descriptive case study
Focuses on detailed observation of a case No pre-existing theoretical framework Used to generate new theories
32
What are the key characteristics of a disciplined interpretive case study
Used to test an existing theory Uses a structured framework for analysis Seeks to confirm or refine theory
33
What are the key characteristics of a least likely case study
Tests a theory in a situation where it is least expected to hold If the theory works in this case, it is strongly supported High-risk test for theories
34
What are the key characteristics of a most likely case study
Tests a theory in a case where it should work If the theory fails here, it is seriously weakened Low-risk test for theories
35
What are the key characteristics of a deviant case study
Examines a case that contradicts existing theories Helps refine theories by explaining anomalies Can reveal new causal mechanisms
36
What is the tradeoff between type 1 and type 2 errors?
As we reduce type 1 error (decreasing p-value), we increase type 2 error possibility
37
How do we reduce type 2 error?
Increase sample size
38