Research and Statistics Flashcards
Nominal
Labels, mutually exclusive, exhaustive
Ex: male and female
Ordinal
Rank ordering, distance between rating not equal
Ex: 1st, 2nd, 3rd place in a race
Interval
Equal intervals between ratings, no true zero point
Ex: temperature
Ratio
Equal intervals, has true zero point
Ex: 10MWT
Reliability
Consistent and dependable- results can be reproduced under same conditions
Random errors limit reliability
Systematic errors limit validity
Data must be reliable before it can be considered valid
SEM
Repeated measures on the same instrument tend to be distributed around the “true” score
Large SEM = low reliability
Small SEM = high reliability
Ex: BP readings 120, 140, 160 vs. 102, 104, 106
Validity
The extent to which a test measures what it is purported to measure
A test must be reliable to be valid - although a highly reliable test may be invalid
Ex: bull’s eye with x’s
Construct Validity
How well a test measures the concept it was designed to measure
Ex: pain, intelligence, QoL
Content Validity
Assesses whether a test is representative of all aspects of the construct
Usually refers to surveys/questionnaires
Ex: QoL outcome measures
Criterion-related validity
Compares a test with other valid measures- gold standard
Concurrent- measures done at same time yield same results
Predictive- comparison btw the test and another measure administered in the future
Floor Effect
A measure’s lowest score does not capture patient’s level of ability
Ex: FGA has a floor effect for complete SCI
Ceiling Effect
A measure’s highest score is unable to assess a patient’s level of ability
Ex: FIST to young athletes post concussion
Minimal detectable change
The minimum amount of change in a patient’s score that ensures the change is not the result of measurement error
Minimal Clinically Important Difference
The smallest amount of change in outcomes that might be considered meaningful to patient/clinician
Sensitivity
True positive rate
How good a test is at determining who has the disease- test is positive for those who have the condition
A test with high sensitivity can be used to r/o the disease–
SnNout it out
SenSitivity = Screening
Specificity
True negative rate
A test that is good at finding those who do not have the condition
How often a test gives a negative result when the person does not have it
High specificity = can Spin it in
SpeCificity = Confirming
Positive Predictive Value
Percentage of people who are positive on the diagnostic test who have the condition
Ex 100% of people with vestibular disorder test (+), then high positive predictive value
Negative Predictive Value
Percentage of people who are negative on the diagnostic test who do not have the condition