reseachers names- psychological explanations Flashcards
Eysenck and Eysenck
compared EPI score of prisoners to control group
prisoners recorded high than control group
across all ages
Farrington (criminal personality)
offenders tended to score higher on psychotic scale and not neurotic or extrovert
Hoffit
proposed types of offenders based on timing of first offence and how long offending continues
Digman
five factor model of personality
agreeableness, openness and conscientiousness in addition
more in touch w/modern personality theories
Bartol and Holanchock
hispanic and african american offernders
groups based on criminal history and crime nature
all groups less extroverted than non-criminal control group
Bartol
sample used different cultural group to cultural group investigated
Mischel
we play different parts of our personality depending on who and where we are
Raine
ADP as result of difference brain structure whilst Eysenck believed it to be due to nervous system activity
Chandler
support for Kolberg’s model and criminality
Schonenberg and Justyle
support for hostile attribution bias
Dodge and Frame
HAB
Barbaree
support for minimalisation
Mednick
alternative explanations to DAT
Gibbs
alternative theories of moral reasoning
mature- pre-conv
immature- conv
post-conv should be abandoned as culturally bias to western culture
Hoffman
gender bias
Lewis
causation not correlation
Palmer and Hollin
level of moral reasoning evidence
11Q dilemma- keeping friend’s secret, not taking something that isn’t yours
delinquent groups showed less mature LOMR
Thornton and Reid
individual differences
financially motivated crimes- pre-conv- robbery
assault- not ass w/any level
pre-conv- think can get away
Langdon
individual differences
intelligence better way to predict offending behavior,
Farringiton (DAT)
,
