Reporting the Crimean War Flashcards
was there censorship in the Crimea
- no
- everything was been printed in full in newspapers
- the Government also couldn’t introduce it half way through or it would look shady
- Russel was v transparent
why was a lack of censorship a negative
- mass hysteria and fear
- but it also meant British tactics could potentially be leaked to the enemy
- potential cynicism and sensationalised - not always true
- Russel maybe more focused on promoting his own success and skill then telling the truth
- people critical of the government and put pressure on them
discuss the revolutions in communications that meant news travelled quicker
- steamships carried reports and letters from Crimea to Britain in 2-3 weeks
- Railways distributed newspapers from the big cities all over the UK
- electric telegraph network transmitted short reports quickly from the Crimea - real time - electric cables under the sea tapped signals - latest short updates and dispatches
- national not just local news
discuss the increasing circulation of newspapers
- huge readership
- The Times increased circulation from 5000 in Nap wars to 40,000 in 1850s
- those that can read tell others that can’t
discuss letters to newspapers from the war
- frequent letters to newspapers from officers fighting in the Crimea
- letters home from individual soldiers coincided with newspaper coverage and provided corroboration of reporting
- individual concern
- makes it all more real
- evokes sympathy
discuss the impact of photos BRIEFLY
- allowed the public to form a visual image of events greatly enhancing the emotional impact of the written reports
- invention of photography and lithograph technology meant reports could be illustrated quickly and cheaply
- Fenton and Robertson
why can a lack of censorship be a positive
- push the Government into action
- transience meant those on the home front felt connected
- it significantly boosted the sales of newspapers and periodicals which in turn brought the war into many homes and pubs allowing the public to be actively involved in debates about how the campaign should be fought
- it allowed the newspapers to increase their profits because people wanted to read it
discuss who Russell worked for and him arriving in the Crimea
- he came to the attention of Delane, editor of The Times
- by 1843 he was employed full time
- Delane sent him to Crimea
- left in Feb 1854
- after spending time with the army in Gallipoli and Varna he reported on the battles of the Crimea and siege of Sevastopol
- wide experience and knowledge
why was Russell’s background so important
- His Anglo-Irish background gave his writings a critical detachment from the English establishment whose incompetence he never hesitated to condemn.
- it meant his loyalties and sympathy lay with the ordinary soldiers, a third of whom were Irish
- Ireland had always been troubled with English
what is a limitation of Russel despite his reports been eagerly awaited and avidly read by almost the entire literate population of London
- he didn’t cover the entirety of the period as he didn’t arrive till 1954
- in winter he stayed in luxury in Constantinople
- left War in Nov 1855
- he was still there for a lot of the significant bits tho including all the battles
discuss the ‘sensibilities’ of Fenton’s photographs
- see pictures of soldiers looking good don’t see dead bodies
discuss how one of Chenery’s reports criticised planning for Scutari
- mentioned that Britain had plenty of time when in Varna to plan
- it was the talk of all for four months
- lack of planning inexcusable
- scathing report for middle class readership and the Gov were not used to this deep scrutiny as not really experienced such intense war reporting before
discuss the relationship between Raglan and Russell
- Raglan complained that Russell had revealed military info that was potentially useful to the enemy
- he advised his officers not to speak to Russell claiming he was a danger to security
- Tsar Nicholas read The Times everyday so Raglan did have a point
- raglan thought Russell below him
- Raglan was under increasing pressure due to his reports - thinks he’s disloyal to British
- Raglan felt the military could fix their problems without extra pressure from the Gov but clearly they couldn’t
what did most of Russell’s reports focus on
the sufferings of the British army during the winter of 1854-55
reported the epidemics of cholera and malaria - within a few weeks some 8000 men were suffering from them - led to public outcry and the government were forced to act
what did Queen Victoria and Prince Albert think about Russell’s reports
- Queen Vic was upset and described them as infamous attacks against the army which have disgraced our newspapers
- Prince Albert commented that the pen and ink of one miserable scribbler was despoiling the army