Renal Cancer Flashcards
What percentage of surgically resected tumors < 4 cm are benign?
15-20%
What percentage of RCC cases are familial? What are syndromes?
4-6%
Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL)
Birt Hogg-Dube (BHD)
Hereditary leiomyomatosis RCC (HLRCC)
Succinate dehydrogenase deficiency
Tuberous sclerosis
BAP-1
PTEN hamartoma (Cowden Syndrome)
Major subtypes of RCC?
clear cell
papillary 1 or 2
chromophobe
collecting duct
unclassified
uncommon: acquired cystic, clear cell tubulo papillary, renal medullary (sickle cell)
Advanced PE findings?
Paraneoplastic syndromes (htn, polycythemia, hypercalcemia)
adenopathy
varicocele
Name benign renal tumors?
Papillary adenoma
Oncocytoma
AML
Metanephric adenoma
Adult cystic nephroma
Mixed epithelial stromal tumors
Juxtaglomerular cell tumor
What is T1 renal tumor? subtypes?
T1 → < 7 cm in greatest dimension, limited to kidney
T1a < 4 cm
T1b < 4 cm, but not > 7 cm
Describe renal tumor T2:
T2 → >7 cm in greatest dimension, limited to kidney
T2a → > 7 cm but < 10 cm
T2b → > 10 cm
Describe renal mass T3:
T3 → tumor extends into major veins or perinephric tissues, but not to adrenal or beyond Gerota’s
T3a → into renal vein or its segmental branches, or invades pelvicalyceal system, or invades perirenal and/or renal sinus fat but not beyond Gerota’s
T3b → Grossly extends into vena cava below diaphragm
T3c → extends into vena cava above diaphragm or invades wall of vena cava
Describe renal mass T4:
T4 → invades beyond Gerota’s (including contiguous adrenal extension)
Define renal cancer N and M stages:
Nx → LN not assessed
N0 → no region LN mets
N1 → mets to regional LN
M0 → no distant mets
M1 → distant mets
Describe renal mass stages:
Describe the treatment options for clinically localized renal cancer:
Active surveillance → cT1a < 4 cm → risk of mets <2%
Radical Nx → historically entire kidney, Gerota’s/ Zuckerkandel’s fascia, regional LN, and adrenal
Partial Nx → NSS
Thermal ablation → RFA and cryoablation
In a patient with renal mass, clinicians SHOULD obtain which imaging? How is mass characterized?
GUIDELINE STATEMENT 1
High-quality, multiphase, cross-sectional abdominal imaging (CT/MRI)
eGFR < 45 → hydration or MRI (especially characterizing small lesions < 2 cm)
NSF (CKD 4/5 → < 0.07%)
Characterize stage (size cranio-caudal, transverse, and A/P, morphology, involvement of vasculature, adenopathy)
Nephrometry score, PADUA score, C-index
Complexity (Bosniak 3 → irregular walls/septa + enhancement ~50% malignant; Bosniak 4 → complex cystic lesions, enhancing ~75-90% malginant)
Degree of contrast enhancement (> 15-20 HU on CT or 20% on MRI)
Presence or absence of fat
Nephrometry Score
RENAL
Radius, Exophytic/Endophyic, Nearness to CS, A/P, Location re: polar lines
In patients with suspected renal cancer, clinician SHOULD obtain which labs? Metastatic eval?
GUIDELINE STATEMENT 2
CMP, CBC, UA (proteinuria important prognostic factor)
UA 1+ protein → Protein: Cr or Alb:Cr
Elevated ALP → consider bone mets
Chest imaging → CXR or CT(evaluate for thoracic mets based on risk of dz)
What makes a renal mass higher risk?
presence of thrombi, presumed adenopathy, larger tumor size, infiltrative appearance, extensive tumor necrosis, severe relevant sxs or PE findings
In patient with solid or Bosniak 3 or 4 mass, in addition to labs and metastatic workup, what other classifications SHOULD be done?
GUIDELINE STATEMENT 3
Assign CKD stage base on GFR and degree proteinuria
In regards to counseling for suspicious renal mass, who SHOULD be considered as players of the multidisciplinary team?
GUIDELINE STATEMENT 4
Urologist → lead counseling process
IR → RMB or ablation
Nephrologist → CKD, proteinuria, DMII, ongoing renal protection
Pathologist → GU dedicated, also evaluation of normal parenchyma
Medical Oncologist → poss neoadjuvant or adjuvant trials, recurrence
Genetic Counseling → 4-6% familial, multifocal or b/l
Clinicians SHOULD provide counseling that includes current perspectives about tumor biology and what patient-specific risk assessment:
GUIDELINE STATEMENT 5
Sex, tumor size/complexicty, histology, imaging characteristics
cT1a (low oncologic risk → indolent, <2% risk mets)
When counseling treatment options for renal mass, clinicians SHOULD review the most common urologic and non-urologic morbidities of each treatment pathway including:
GUIDELINE STATEMENT 6
the importance of age, comorbidities/frailty, and life expectancy
RN → greatest risk dec. GFR or de novo CKD, favorable peri-op outcomes and low risk of complication compared to PN
PN → excellent preservation of GFR, higher risk txf, urine leak or other complications needing additional tx (stent, drains, embolization of pseudo-aneurysm)
TA → inferior RFS, most favorable peri-operative outcome profile (best for small peripheral tumors)
AS → favorable oncologic and OS outcomes in well-selected patients; possible anxiety or poor outcomes
What SHOULD clinicians review in regards to renal function recovery related to renal mass management:
GUIDELINE STATEMENT 7
Progressive CKD
ST and LT need for RRT
LT OS considerations
Clinicians SHOULD refer to nephrology renal mass patients with:
GUIDELINE STATEMENT 8
High risk of CKD progression (eGFR < 45), confirmed proteinuria, DMII pre-existing CKD, or expected GFR < 30 after sx
In regards to renal cancer, when is genetic counseling RECOMMENDED:
GUIDELINE STATEMENT 9
< 46 yo
Multifocal or b/l masses
personal hx suggests familial renal neoplastic syndrome
1st or 2nd degree relative with hx of renal cancer or known clinical/genetic dx of familial neoplastic syndrome (even if kidney cancer not observed)
path demonstrates histologic features suggestive of syndrome
Syndrome: Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL)
Gene: VHL
Clear cell RCC, renal cysts, hemangioblastomas of CNS, retinal angiomas, pheochromocytoma
Syndrome: Hereditary Papillary Renal Carcinoma (HRPC)
Gene: MET
Type 1 papillary RCC
Syndrome: Birt Hogg-Dube (BHD)
Gene: FLCN
chromophobe RCC, oncocytoma, hybrid oncocytic/chromophobe tumors (HOCTs), cc RCC (less common), renal cysts, cutaneous fibrofolliculomas, lung cysts, spontaneous PTX
Syndrome: Hereditary Leiomyomatosis and RCC (FH)
Gene: FH
type 2 papillary or CD RCC, cutaneous leioyomyomas, uterine leiyomyomas
Syndrome: Succinate Dehydrogenase Kidney Cancer (SDH-RCC)
Gene: SDHB/C/D
ccRCC, choromophobe RCC, type 2 papillary RCC, oncocytoma, pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma
Syndrome: BAP-1 Tumor Predisposition Syndrome
Gene: BAP-1
ccRCC, uveal melanoma
Syndrome: Tuberous Sclerosis Complex
Gene: TSC 1 or 2
AML, ccRCC, oncocytoma, lymphangioleiyomyomastosis (LAM), seizures, developmental delay
Syndrome: Cowden/PTEN Syndrome associated RCC (CS-RCC)
Gene: PTEN
Thyroid, breast, and endometrial cancer, mucocutaneous lesions, RCC with papillary mc, other forms of RCC including cc
When considering RMB what SHOULD be counseled?
GUIDELINE STATEMENT 10
generally safe & complications low risk: hematoma, pain, hematuria, PTX, hemorrhage (txf)
Sensitivity 9.67%, Specificity 94.4%, PPV 98.8% (core), NPV 60-80%
non-diagnostic rate 14%, concern for missed histologic heterogeneity
Discussion:
RMB is safe and low risk (no reported tumor seeding)
Dx of RCC is highly reliable
LImits:
Benign bx must be distinguished from non-dx
Benign is not always correct
Grade concordance from bx to sx is not perfect
Oncocytic neoplasm are diagnostic dilemma
Bx or aspiration of cystic mass not advised (spillage)
When concerned about hematologic, metastatic, inflammatory, or infectious mass, clinicians SHOULD consider? What type of cancers are common?
GUIDELINE STATMENT 11
RMB
Lymphoma, lung, melanoma, colon, thyroid
RMB SHOULD be obtained on utility-based approach when it may influence mgmt. It is NOT required when:
GUIDELINE STATMENT 12
Young or healthy patients who are unwilling to accept uncertainties
older or frail patients who will be managed conservatively no matter results