renal Flashcards
pazopanib selectivity and toxicities
more selective to VEGF, less fatigue mucositis, more LFT abnl; better QOL compared to sunitinib
COMPARZ trial
phase III pazopanib. v. sunitinib first line; 1100 pts, non-inferiority study; reached endpoint–> pazopanib 8.4mo v. 9.5mo; HR 1.047, falling within margin
tox with pazopanib
LFTs
second line therapy
sorafenib
everolimus toxicities
infections, stomatitis, 15% non-infectious pneumonitis
pneumonitis toxicity everolimus
treat with steroids
axitinib
potent VEGF inhibitor, more than pazopanib; treated in second line setting versus sorafenib; PFS improved PFS 6.7v4.7mo
sorafenib tox
more skin
axitinib tox
diarrhea
second line therapy
either axitinib or everolimus; sequence not so important
combinations v. monotherapy
no benefit of combine; temsirolimus + bev–> no added benefit, more toxicity
poor risk tx
temsirolimus
poor risk factors
anemia, poor PS,
interferon for renal cancer
improved survival compared to megace
IL-2 for renal
small proportion with durable complete response, 2.5%, high tox
cytoreductive nephrectomy- should you take primary out?
2 studies with improved survival with this approach: do if no brain mets and safe procedure before starting meds
MSKCC risk groups (prognostic)
KPS<80, short time to need for treatment 12mo, low Hgb, high Ca, high LDH. favorable 0, 1-2 int, 3-5 poor.
temsirolimus FDA approval
used for the poor risk group only
histotypes of RCC
75% clear cell, 15% papillary, 5% chromophobe, 5% oncocytoma, rare others
clear cell RCC
VHL mutation (70-70%), LOH (3p25), or hypermethylation
Type 1 papillary RCC
c-met mutation