remoteness, defences & remedies Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Define remoteness.

A

Once causation has been established it is necessary to examine the extent of the defendant’s liability.
- damage must not be too remote
from the defendant’s breach.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the test for reasonable foreseeability?

A

A claimant can only recover if the type of damage suffered was reasonably foreseeable at the time the defendant breached their duty
of care.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Name and explain the key case for remoteness- reasonable foreseeability.

A

The Wagon Mound 1-
- leaked fuel near wharf, sparks from nearby ignited oil and so fire destroyed wharf + many boats.
HELD= Damage wasn’t reasonably foreseeable- Pollution damage was foreseeable, but fire damage was not.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Can D be liable for all types of damage?

A

No, D ought to have foreseen the ‘type’ of damage suffered
- D will only be liable if particular type of damage was reasonably foreseeable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Is there a requirement to foresee the exact way damage occurs and the extent?

A

no

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the thin skull rule?

A
  • need to foresee the extent’ principle applies even if the damage or extent of injury has been aggravated by the claimant’s own weakness.
    -D takes victim as they find them.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How is a defence proved?

A

On the balance of probabilities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Which 4 elements must be shown to prove that C gave consent as a defence?

A
  • C had capacity to give valid consent to risks
  • C had full knowledge of extent and nature of risk
  • C agreed to risk of injury
  • C agreed voluntarily
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

To establish the defence of consent, a defendant must show that the claimant consented to the risk concerned ‘voluntarily’. When considering whether an employee’s consent is voluntary…

A

…it will be hard but not impossible for an employer to rely on the defence of consent when faced with an employee’s claim.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the legal test for contributory negligence?

A

D must establish:
- C failed to take reasonable steps for their own safety; and
- this failure contributed to C’s damage

** it’s a partial defence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How does failure to take reasonable steps differ for emergencies and children?

A

emergencies= Allowances are made for claimants who have been placed in an emergency or difficult dilemma ie claimants who are injured whilst trying to save themselves.

children= court will take into account their age in determining the standard of care to be expected

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How is contributory negligence calculated?

A

The court has a discretion on how great a reduction to make to the claimant’s damages.
- C’s degree of culpability will generally be expressed in percentage terms, taking into account the respective culpability of the defendant and claimant.
- An equivalent percentage of damages will then be deducted from the claimant’s award.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the defence of illegality?

A

ex turpi causa non oritur actio = ‘no action may be based on an illegal cause.
- If the defence of illegality is established, it is a complete defence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Which case established test for illegality and what is the test?

A

Patel v Mirza:
1- what was purpose of law on which D seeks to rely
2- were there any relevant public policy considerations to be applied?
3- was denial of claim proportionate to illegality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the defence of necessity?

A

applicable where the defendant acted to save life, limb or property.
**complete defence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How is a defence of necessity proved?

A

D must prove that:
- acting in an emergency to prevent harm; and
- were not at fault for causing emergency

17
Q

Which 2 principal remedies do courts award in tort?

A

1- damages
2- injunctions

18
Q

What is the aim of damages?

A

put C in position they would have been in but for D’s tortious act, as far as this is possible with an award of money.

19
Q

what are special and general damages?

A

Special damages cover specifically provable and quantifiable financial losses at the time of trial.

General damages cover future financial losses, which cannot be specifically proven, and non-quantifiable losses such
as compensation for physical injury.

20
Q

What are damages of paint and suffering and damages for loss of amenity?

A

Pain & suffering= physical and mental anguish, including ones occurred in past, present and will continue into future

loss of amenity= quality of life, ability to enjoy it, how acting C was

21
Q

What happens to damages when C dies in LRMPA 1934?

A

example- an employee is negligently injured at work. They suffer with the injury for two weeks before passing away. At the time of death, the employee could have brought a claim for a PSLA. This Act allows their estate to make that claim instead.

22
Q

What happens to damages when C dies in Fatal accidents act 1976?

A

allows for any dependants of the deceased (ie people who depended on the deceased) to claim for any losses suffered as a result of the death.